Dexamethasone-based Prophylactic Therapy for Prevention of Post-Embolization Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing its Efficacy and Influence of Dosage and Timing in Patients Undergoing Arterial Embolization.
Muhammad Zain Raza, Ali Ahmad Nadeem, Huzaifa Fayyaz Khwaja, Muhammad Omais, Hafiz Muhammad Ehsan Arshad, Musab Maqsood
{"title":"Dexamethasone-based Prophylactic Therapy for Prevention of Post-Embolization Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing its Efficacy and Influence of Dosage and Timing in Patients Undergoing Arterial Embolization.","authors":"Muhammad Zain Raza, Ali Ahmad Nadeem, Huzaifa Fayyaz Khwaja, Muhammad Omais, Hafiz Muhammad Ehsan Arshad, Musab Maqsood","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.12.079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Post-embolization syndrome (PES), characterized by pain, fever, nausea, and vomiting, is a common but non-serious adverse event following arterial embolization, negatively impacting patient satisfaction with the procedure. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone-based prophylactic therapy in preventing PES, as well as to assess the effects of its dosage and timing of administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across three databases, two trial registries, and citation searches to identify relevant studies. Data related to postoperative pain, fever, nausea, and vomiting were extracted and meta-analyzed using a random-effects model and the Mantel-Haenszel method. Meta-regression was performed to examine the role of dexamethasone dose and timing of administration as mediators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dexamethasone-based prophylactic therapy significantly reduced the risk of postoperative pain (RR=0.58, 95% CI: 0.48-0.69; P<0.00001), fever (RR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.22-0.61; P<0.00001), nausea (RR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.41-0.67; P<0.00001), and vomiting (RR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.36-0.82; P=0.004) compared to placebo or no treatment. A higher dose of dexamethasone was associated with a significantly lower incidence of postoperative pain (P=0.038). Regarding timing, postoperative and continuous (extending throughout the perioperative period) administration, was more effective than preoperative administration (P=0.024; P=0.007). A dosage of 6-12 mg was particularly effective in reducing the risk for all four symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dexamethasone effectively prevents PES in patients undergoing arterial embolization. An optimal protocol may involve a divided dose regimen within the range of 6-12 mg, extending throughout the recovery period for maximum benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2024.12.079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Post-embolization syndrome (PES), characterized by pain, fever, nausea, and vomiting, is a common but non-serious adverse event following arterial embolization, negatively impacting patient satisfaction with the procedure. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone-based prophylactic therapy in preventing PES, as well as to assess the effects of its dosage and timing of administration.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted across three databases, two trial registries, and citation searches to identify relevant studies. Data related to postoperative pain, fever, nausea, and vomiting were extracted and meta-analyzed using a random-effects model and the Mantel-Haenszel method. Meta-regression was performed to examine the role of dexamethasone dose and timing of administration as mediators.
Results: Dexamethasone-based prophylactic therapy significantly reduced the risk of postoperative pain (RR=0.58, 95% CI: 0.48-0.69; P<0.00001), fever (RR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.22-0.61; P<0.00001), nausea (RR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.41-0.67; P<0.00001), and vomiting (RR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.36-0.82; P=0.004) compared to placebo or no treatment. A higher dose of dexamethasone was associated with a significantly lower incidence of postoperative pain (P=0.038). Regarding timing, postoperative and continuous (extending throughout the perioperative period) administration, was more effective than preoperative administration (P=0.024; P=0.007). A dosage of 6-12 mg was particularly effective in reducing the risk for all four symptoms.
Conclusion: Dexamethasone effectively prevents PES in patients undergoing arterial embolization. An optimal protocol may involve a divided dose regimen within the range of 6-12 mg, extending throughout the recovery period for maximum benefit.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal:
Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials)
Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work)
Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients)
General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic)
Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery
Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers)
Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery)
Editorials/Correspondence