Dexamethasone-Based Prophylactic Therapy for Prevention of Post-Embolization Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing Its Efficacy and Influence of Dosage and Timing in Patients Undergoing Arterial Embolization

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Annals of vascular surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2024.12.079
Muhammad Zain Raza, Ali Ahmad Nadeem, Huzaifa Fayyaz Khwaja, Muhammad Omais, Hafiz Muhammad Ehsan Arshad, Musab Maqsood
{"title":"Dexamethasone-Based Prophylactic Therapy for Prevention of Post-Embolization Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing Its Efficacy and Influence of Dosage and Timing in Patients Undergoing Arterial Embolization","authors":"Muhammad Zain Raza,&nbsp;Ali Ahmad Nadeem,&nbsp;Huzaifa Fayyaz Khwaja,&nbsp;Muhammad Omais,&nbsp;Hafiz Muhammad Ehsan Arshad,&nbsp;Musab Maqsood","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.12.079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Postembolization syndrome (PES), characterized by pain, fever, nausea, and vomiting, is a common but nonserious adverse event following arterial embolization, negatively impacting patient satisfaction with the procedure. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone-based prophylactic therapy in preventing PES, as well as to assess the effects of its dosage and timing of administration.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted across 3 databases, 2 trial registries, and citation searches to identify relevant studies. Data related to postoperative pain, fever, nausea, and vomiting were extracted and meta-analyzed using a random-effects model and the Mantel-Haenszel method. Meta-regression was performed to examine the role of dexamethasone dose and timing of administration as mediators.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Dexamethasone-based prophylactic therapy significantly reduced the risk of postoperative pain (risk ratio (RR) = 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48–0.69; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001), fever (RR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.22–0.61; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001), nausea (RR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.41–0.67; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001), and vomiting (RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.36–0.82; <em>P</em> = 0.004) compared to placebo or no treatment. A higher dose of dexamethasone was associated with a significantly lower incidence of postoperative pain (<em>P</em> = 0.038). Regarding timing, postoperative and continuous (extending throughout the perioperative period) administration, was more effective than preoperative administration (<em>P</em> = 0.024; <em>P</em> = 0.007). A dosage of 6–12 mg was particularly effective in reducing the risk for all 4 symptoms.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dexamethasone effectively prevents PES in patients undergoing arterial embolization. An optimal protocol may involve a divided dose regimen within the range of 6–12 mg, extending throughout the recovery period for maximum benefit.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"113 ","pages":"Pages 95-111"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509625000342","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Postembolization syndrome (PES), characterized by pain, fever, nausea, and vomiting, is a common but nonserious adverse event following arterial embolization, negatively impacting patient satisfaction with the procedure. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone-based prophylactic therapy in preventing PES, as well as to assess the effects of its dosage and timing of administration.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted across 3 databases, 2 trial registries, and citation searches to identify relevant studies. Data related to postoperative pain, fever, nausea, and vomiting were extracted and meta-analyzed using a random-effects model and the Mantel-Haenszel method. Meta-regression was performed to examine the role of dexamethasone dose and timing of administration as mediators.

Results

Dexamethasone-based prophylactic therapy significantly reduced the risk of postoperative pain (risk ratio (RR) = 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48–0.69; P < 0.00001), fever (RR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.22–0.61; P < 0.00001), nausea (RR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.41–0.67; P < 0.00001), and vomiting (RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.36–0.82; P = 0.004) compared to placebo or no treatment. A higher dose of dexamethasone was associated with a significantly lower incidence of postoperative pain (P = 0.038). Regarding timing, postoperative and continuous (extending throughout the perioperative period) administration, was more effective than preoperative administration (P = 0.024; P = 0.007). A dosage of 6–12 mg was particularly effective in reducing the risk for all 4 symptoms.

Conclusion

Dexamethasone effectively prevents PES in patients undergoing arterial embolization. An optimal protocol may involve a divided dose regimen within the range of 6–12 mg, extending throughout the recovery period for maximum benefit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以地塞米松为基础的预防性治疗预防动脉栓塞后综合征:一项评估其疗效及剂量和时机对动脉栓塞患者影响的系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景和目的:栓塞后综合征(PES)以疼痛、发热、恶心和呕吐为特征,是动脉栓塞后常见但不严重的不良事件,对患者对手术的满意度产生负面影响。本研究旨在评估以地塞米松为基础的预防性治疗对PES的预防效果,并评估其剂量和给药时间的影响。方法:通过三个数据库、两个试验注册库和引文检索进行系统检索,以确定相关研究。提取与术后疼痛、发热、恶心和呕吐相关的数据,并使用随机效应模型和Mantel-Haenszel方法进行meta分析。meta回归检验了地塞米松剂量和给药时间作为介质的作用。结果:以地塞米松为基础的预防性治疗可显著降低术后疼痛风险(RR=0.58, 95% CI: 0.48-0.69;结论:地塞米松可有效预防动脉栓塞患者发生PES。最佳方案可能包括在6- 12mg范围内的分剂量方案,在整个恢复期延长以获得最大益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
期刊最新文献
Evolution of creative techniques of PMEGs for arch aneurysms. The Current State of Endovascular Aortic Repair in Heritable Thoracic Aortic Disease. Experimental Evaluation of a Large Fenestrated Physician-Modified Endo-wheat Using a Cadaveric Model. INTRAVASCULAR LITHOTRIPSY AND THE NEED FOR SCAFFOLDING IN ISOLATED POPLITEAL LESIONS. THREE-DIMENSIONAL ULTRASOUND FOR ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM SURVEILLANCE: DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY, REPRODUCIBILITY, AND AGREEMENT WITH CT. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1