Impact of a new image enhancement technology on the nuchal translucency thickness.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1007/s00404-024-07924-1
Tania Elger, Natalia Prodan, Kristina Bettecken, Jiri Sonek, Karl Oliver Kagan
{"title":"Impact of a new image enhancement technology on the nuchal translucency thickness.","authors":"Tania Elger, Natalia Prodan, Kristina Bettecken, Jiri Sonek, Karl Oliver Kagan","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07924-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the impact of a new image enhancement technique on the distribution of NT measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, nuchal translucency (NT) images that were taken with the GE Voluson E22 ultrasound machine between May and September 2024 were collected. One operator took manual and automated NT measurements in an NT image without radiant enhancement mode followed by automated measurements in NT images with minimum, medium and maximum radiant mode. The automated measurement in the NT images without radiant mode were considered gold standard. The relative bias of the gold standard, the manual measurement and the automated measurements with the radiant enhancement technology were compared using median and 25-75th interquartile range as well as by the Wilcoxon test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The database search yielded 352 NT images from 101 pregnant women. Average maternal age of the study population was 34.0 years and average crown-rump length was 68.3. The median NT thickness was 1.7 mm for both the manual and automated measurements done without the use of radiant mode. The median automated measurement with minimum, medium and maximum radiant mode was 2.00, 2.05 and 2.10 mm, respectively. All automated measurements were significantly higher than the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The use of the radiant mode results in an increase in the NT thickness. This effect should be taken into account when calculating the risk for chromosomal abnormalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07924-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the impact of a new image enhancement technique on the distribution of NT measurements.

Methods: In this retrospective study, nuchal translucency (NT) images that were taken with the GE Voluson E22 ultrasound machine between May and September 2024 were collected. One operator took manual and automated NT measurements in an NT image without radiant enhancement mode followed by automated measurements in NT images with minimum, medium and maximum radiant mode. The automated measurement in the NT images without radiant mode were considered gold standard. The relative bias of the gold standard, the manual measurement and the automated measurements with the radiant enhancement technology were compared using median and 25-75th interquartile range as well as by the Wilcoxon test.

Results: The database search yielded 352 NT images from 101 pregnant women. Average maternal age of the study population was 34.0 years and average crown-rump length was 68.3. The median NT thickness was 1.7 mm for both the manual and automated measurements done without the use of radiant mode. The median automated measurement with minimum, medium and maximum radiant mode was 2.00, 2.05 and 2.10 mm, respectively. All automated measurements were significantly higher than the gold standard.

Discussion: The use of the radiant mode results in an increase in the NT thickness. This effect should be taken into account when calculating the risk for chromosomal abnormalities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的:研究一种新的图像增强技术对 NT 测量分布的影响:研究一种新的图像增强技术对 NT 测量值分布的影响:在这项回顾性研究中,收集了2024年5月至9月期间使用GE Voluson E22超声机拍摄的颈部透明层(NT)图像。一名操作员在无辐射增强模式的NT图像中进行手动和自动NT测量,然后在最小、中等和最大辐射模式的NT图像中进行自动测量。在无辐射增强模式的 NT 图像中进行的自动测量被视为金标准。使用中位数和 25-75 分四分位数间距以及 Wilcoxon 检验比较了金标准、手动测量和采用辐射增强技术的自动测量的相对偏差:通过数据库搜索,获得了 101 名孕妇的 352 张 NT 图像。研究对象的平均孕龄为 34.0 岁,平均头臀长为 68.3。在不使用辐射模式的情况下,手动和自动测量的 NT 厚度中位数均为 1.7 毫米。使用最小、中等和最大辐射模式进行的自动测量中值分别为 2.00、2.05 和 2.10 毫米。所有自动测量结果都明显高于黄金标准:讨论:使用辐射模式会导致 NT 厚度增加。讨论:使用辐射模式会导致 NT 厚度增加,在计算染色体异常风险时应考虑到这一影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic yield of chromosomal microarray to examine the genetic factors associated with fetal aberrant right subclavian artery. The effect of endometriosis on oocyte quality: mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment. The prospective sonographic assessment of the lower uterine segment after cesarean section and its clinical utility. Do menstrual symptoms affect motor imagery skills in young women? Frequency of CMV testing during pregnancy-a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1