The effect of intrapartum deinfibulation on obstetric outcomes and postpartum sexual function in pregnant women with Type 3 Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1007/s00404-024-07923-2
Yaşam Kemal Akpak, Erhan Aktürk, Serkan Oral, Mehmet Ferdi Kıncı, Ahkam Göksel Kanmaz, Mehmet Bora Bozgeyik, Emrah Töz
{"title":"The effect of intrapartum deinfibulation on obstetric outcomes and postpartum sexual function in pregnant women with Type 3 Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting.","authors":"Yaşam Kemal Akpak, Erhan Aktürk, Serkan Oral, Mehmet Ferdi Kıncı, Ahkam Göksel Kanmaz, Mehmet Bora Bozgeyik, Emrah Töz","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07923-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) is a surgical intervention that is still performed in large numbers worldwide and has severe effects in terms of both obstetric and sexual consequences. Due to the increase in immigration, it has become more frequent in many countries. This study aims to compare the labor performance, complications, and postpartum sexual function of Type 3 Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) pregnant women undergoing deinfibulation with Type 3 FGM/C patients without deinfibulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective study of pregnant women with Type 3 FGM/C and puerperium patients at Nyala Turkish Training and Research Hospital in Sudan over 4 years, from September 2018 to September 2022. Type 3 FGM/C patients who underwent deinfibulation were compared with those who did not, considering age, parity, and obstetric and neonatal outcomes and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scores at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our homogeneous Type 3 FGM/C group mainly consisting of primiparous women, it was found that more episiotomy procedures were performed. The second stage of labor was significantly prolonged, and perineal damage was greater in the group without deinfibulation. In addition, postpartum hemorrhage and hospitalization of mother and baby were longer in the group without deinfibulation. In the second part of our study, we compared the FSFI scores between the deinfibulation group and the episiotomy subgroup. The results indicated that the deinfibulation group exhibited higher scores across all FSFI domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Type 3 FGM/C is definitely associated with poor obstetric and sexual outcomes. It is essential to include partners in family discussions and to protect the perineum by performing deinfibulation and episiotomy at appropriate times and in the correct manner during labor.</p><p><strong>What does this study adds to the clinical work: </strong>The contribution of the deinfibulation procedure, which is recognized for its obstetric benefits, should also be communicated to families and spouses in terms of its long-term impact on sexual performance. By sharing this information, the devastating effects of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) can be mitigated, both obstetrically and sexually.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07923-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) is a surgical intervention that is still performed in large numbers worldwide and has severe effects in terms of both obstetric and sexual consequences. Due to the increase in immigration, it has become more frequent in many countries. This study aims to compare the labor performance, complications, and postpartum sexual function of Type 3 Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) pregnant women undergoing deinfibulation with Type 3 FGM/C patients without deinfibulation.

Methods: This is a prospective study of pregnant women with Type 3 FGM/C and puerperium patients at Nyala Turkish Training and Research Hospital in Sudan over 4 years, from September 2018 to September 2022. Type 3 FGM/C patients who underwent deinfibulation were compared with those who did not, considering age, parity, and obstetric and neonatal outcomes and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scores at 3 months.

Results: In our homogeneous Type 3 FGM/C group mainly consisting of primiparous women, it was found that more episiotomy procedures were performed. The second stage of labor was significantly prolonged, and perineal damage was greater in the group without deinfibulation. In addition, postpartum hemorrhage and hospitalization of mother and baby were longer in the group without deinfibulation. In the second part of our study, we compared the FSFI scores between the deinfibulation group and the episiotomy subgroup. The results indicated that the deinfibulation group exhibited higher scores across all FSFI domains.

Conclusion: Type 3 FGM/C is definitely associated with poor obstetric and sexual outcomes. It is essential to include partners in family discussions and to protect the perineum by performing deinfibulation and episiotomy at appropriate times and in the correct manner during labor.

What does this study adds to the clinical work: The contribution of the deinfibulation procedure, which is recognized for its obstetric benefits, should also be communicated to families and spouses in terms of its long-term impact on sexual performance. By sharing this information, the devastating effects of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) can be mitigated, both obstetrically and sexually.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的切割女性生殖器(FGM/C)是一种外科干预措施,在全世界仍有大量实施,并对产科和性生活造成严重影响。由于移民的增加,这种手术在许多国家变得越来越频繁。本研究旨在比较接受去阴道纤毛术(FGM/C)的三类女性生殖器切割(FGM/C)孕妇与未接受去阴道纤毛术的三类女性生殖器切割(FGM/C)患者的分娩表现、并发症和产后性功能:这是一项前瞻性研究,研究对象为苏丹尼亚拉土耳其培训与研究医院的 3 型切割女性生殖器(FGM/C)孕妇和产褥期患者,研究时间为 2018 年 9 月至 2022 年 9 月,为期 4 年。考虑到年龄、奇偶性、产科和新生儿结局以及 3 个月时的女性性功能指数(FSFI)评分,对接受了去纤维化手术的 3 型 FGM/C 患者与未接受去纤维化手术的患者进行了比较:在主要由初产妇组成的同质 3 型女性生殖器切割/C 组中,我们发现进行了更多的外阴切开术。第二产程明显延长,会阴损伤在未脱肛组更大。此外,无去骨盆纤维组的产后出血和母婴住院时间更长。在研究的第二部分,我们比较了去纤维组和外阴切开术亚组的 FSFI 评分。结果表明,去纤维组在所有 FSFI 领域的得分都较高:结论:女性生殖器切割(FGM/C)第 3 类肯定与不良的产科和性结果有关。这项研究对临床工作有何帮助?这项研究对临床工作有何帮助:除膀胱阴道松弛术对产科的益处已得到公认,但它对性功能的长期影响也应告知家属和配偶。通过分享这些信息,可以减轻切割女性生殖器(FGM/C)在产科和性方面造成的破坏性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
期刊最新文献
The role of D-dimer changes in predicting delivery time in preterm premature rupture of membranes: a retrospective analysis. Comparison of MRI findings for predicting massive hemorrhage during cesarean section in patients with placental malposition: partial placental volume of lower uterine segment is an accurate and objective indicator. Fasting glucose levels at diagnosis and delivery are associated with postpartum glucose abnormalities in GDM women. The outcome of early perineal rehabilitation in obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a single-center experience. Maternal cell-free DNA in early pregnancy for preeclampsia screening: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1