{"title":"Effects of Seaweed Polysaccharide on the Growth and Physiological Health of Largemouth Bass, <i>Micropterus salmoides</i>.","authors":"Dongyu Huang, Jiaze Gu, Hualiang Liang, Mingchun Ren, Chunyu Xue","doi":"10.3390/antiox14010052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A seven-week trial was designed to evaluate the effects of dietary seaweed polysaccharide (SP) supplementation on the growth performance and physiological health of largemouth bass. The results reveal that the 0.05SP group showed the best growth performance. The mRNA expression levels of <i>tor</i>, <i>4ebp1</i>, and <i>igf1</i> genes were remarkably down-regulated in the 0.15SP and 0.2SP groups compared to the control group. The CAT activities were significantly increased in the 0.05SP and 0.1SP groups, and the GSH-Px activity was increased in the 0.15SP group. The expression of the immune response-related gene <i>nfκb</i> was significantly down-regulated in the 0.1SP group, and those of <i>tnfα</i> and <i>il-8</i> were at the maximum in the control group. Moreover, the expression of <i>il-10</i> in the 0.15SP and 0.2SP groups was significantly down-regulated. Furthermore, endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS)-related expression of <i>atf6</i> was the highest in the control group. Furthermore, the <i>chopα</i> and <i>bax</i> expression levels in the 0.15SP and 0.2SP groups were significantly down-regulated compared with other groups. In addition, the highest expression level of <i>bcl-xl</i> was observed in the 0.15SP group. Finally, the quadratic regression analysis of antioxidant, immune, and ERS core parameters (CAT, <i>nf-κb</i>, and <i>bcl-xl</i>) determined 0.06-0.11% to be the optimal SP supplemental level in largemouth bass diets.</p>","PeriodicalId":7984,"journal":{"name":"Antioxidants","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11763202/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antioxidants","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14010052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A seven-week trial was designed to evaluate the effects of dietary seaweed polysaccharide (SP) supplementation on the growth performance and physiological health of largemouth bass. The results reveal that the 0.05SP group showed the best growth performance. The mRNA expression levels of tor, 4ebp1, and igf1 genes were remarkably down-regulated in the 0.15SP and 0.2SP groups compared to the control group. The CAT activities were significantly increased in the 0.05SP and 0.1SP groups, and the GSH-Px activity was increased in the 0.15SP group. The expression of the immune response-related gene nfκb was significantly down-regulated in the 0.1SP group, and those of tnfα and il-8 were at the maximum in the control group. Moreover, the expression of il-10 in the 0.15SP and 0.2SP groups was significantly down-regulated. Furthermore, endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS)-related expression of atf6 was the highest in the control group. Furthermore, the chopα and bax expression levels in the 0.15SP and 0.2SP groups were significantly down-regulated compared with other groups. In addition, the highest expression level of bcl-xl was observed in the 0.15SP group. Finally, the quadratic regression analysis of antioxidant, immune, and ERS core parameters (CAT, nf-κb, and bcl-xl) determined 0.06-0.11% to be the optimal SP supplemental level in largemouth bass diets.
AntioxidantsBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Physiology
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
11.40%
发文量
2123
审稿时长
16.3 days
期刊介绍:
Antioxidants (ISSN 2076-3921), provides an advanced forum for studies related to the science and technology of antioxidants. It publishes research papers, reviews and communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation or experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary electronic material.