Effects of silymarin on insulin resistance and sensitivity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IF 7.4 3区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes research and clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112008
Shao Yin , Fengya Zhu , Ying Liu , Qiu Chen
{"title":"Effects of silymarin on insulin resistance and sensitivity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Shao Yin ,&nbsp;Fengya Zhu ,&nbsp;Ying Liu ,&nbsp;Qiu Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to evaluate the effect of silymarin on insulin resistance and insulin sensitivity through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to September 2024 for relevant RCTs. The intervention required silymarin supplementation for at least 4 weeks. Primary outcomes were homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and fasting insulin (FI), while secondary outcomes included quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI). Bias risk was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2. Subgroup analyses were based on disease type, duration, and dosage. Sensitivity and publication bias analyses were conducted using Egger’s and Begg’s tests. Statistical analysis and meta-analysis were performed using Stata 15.1.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Six studies with 673 participants from Iran, Egypt, and Italy were included. All studies had low risk of bias. Meta-analysis showed that Silybum marianum significantly improved HOMA-IR (WMD = −2.29, 95 % CI: −4.55 to −0.03, p = 0.047) but had no effect on FI (WMD = −2.56, 95 % CI: −7.60 to 2.48, p = 0.862). Subgroup analyses revealed improvements in HOMA-IR for T2DM and diabetics with alcoholic cirrhosis, but no effect in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients. QUICKI did not show significant changes in any group. Only one study reported changes in QUICKI. The results indicated that, compared to the placebo, silymarin improved insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that there is limited evidence supporting the effectiveness of silymarin in improving HOMA-IR and FI levels in metabolic diseases, and it generally does not appear to significantly improve these parameters. Future studies should aim to increase the number of high-quality RCTs to further validate the efficacy and safety of silymarin, as well as to explore its underlying mechanisms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11249,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 112008"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168822725000221","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to evaluate the effect of silymarin on insulin resistance and insulin sensitivity through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to September 2024 for relevant RCTs. The intervention required silymarin supplementation for at least 4 weeks. Primary outcomes were homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and fasting insulin (FI), while secondary outcomes included quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI). Bias risk was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2. Subgroup analyses were based on disease type, duration, and dosage. Sensitivity and publication bias analyses were conducted using Egger’s and Begg’s tests. Statistical analysis and meta-analysis were performed using Stata 15.1.

Results

Six studies with 673 participants from Iran, Egypt, and Italy were included. All studies had low risk of bias. Meta-analysis showed that Silybum marianum significantly improved HOMA-IR (WMD = −2.29, 95 % CI: −4.55 to −0.03, p = 0.047) but had no effect on FI (WMD = −2.56, 95 % CI: −7.60 to 2.48, p = 0.862). Subgroup analyses revealed improvements in HOMA-IR for T2DM and diabetics with alcoholic cirrhosis, but no effect in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients. QUICKI did not show significant changes in any group. Only one study reported changes in QUICKI. The results indicated that, compared to the placebo, silymarin improved insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that there is limited evidence supporting the effectiveness of silymarin in improving HOMA-IR and FI levels in metabolic diseases, and it generally does not appear to significantly improve these parameters. Future studies should aim to increase the number of high-quality RCTs to further validate the efficacy and safety of silymarin, as well as to explore its underlying mechanisms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水飞蓟素对胰岛素抵抗和敏感性的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:本研究旨在通过随机对照试验(rct)的系统回顾和荟萃分析,评价水飞蓟素对胰岛素抵抗和胰岛素敏感性的影响。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library,检索截止到2024年9月的相关随机对照试验。干预需要补充水飞蓟素至少4周。主要结局是胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)和空腹胰岛素(FI),次要结局包括定量胰岛素敏感性检查指数(QUICKI)。偏倚风险采用Cochrane RoB 2进行评估。亚组分析基于疾病类型、持续时间和剂量。采用Egger’s和Begg’s检验进行敏感性和发表偏倚分析。采用Stata 15.1进行统计分析和meta分析。结果:包括来自伊朗、埃及和意大利的673名参与者的6项研究。所有研究的偏倚风险均较低。荟萃分析显示,水飞蓟显著改善HOMA-IR (WMD = -2.29, 95% CI: -4.55 ~ -0.03, p = 0.047),但对FI无影响(WMD = -2.56, 95% CI: -7.60 ~ 2.48, p = 0.862)。亚组分析显示,T2DM和糖尿病合并酒精性肝硬化患者的HOMA-IR有所改善,但对非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)患者没有影响。QUICKI在任何组中都没有显示出明显的变化。只有一项研究报告了QUICKI的变化。结果表明,与安慰剂相比,水飞蓟素改善了2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的胰岛素敏感性。结论:综上所述,本研究结果表明水飞蓟素改善代谢性疾病HOMA-IR和FI水平的有效性证据有限,一般没有明显改善这些参数的迹象。未来的研究应致力于增加高质量的随机对照试验的数量,以进一步验证水飞蓟素的有效性和安全性,并探索其潜在的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes research and clinical practice
Diabetes research and clinical practice 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
862
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice is an international journal for health-care providers and clinically oriented researchers that publishes high-quality original research articles and expert reviews in diabetes and related areas. The role of the journal is to provide a venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to diabetes clinical research and patient care. Topics of focus include translational science, genetics, immunology, nutrition, psychosocial research, epidemiology, prevention, socio-economic research, complications, new treatments, technologies and therapy.
期刊最新文献
Inflammatory biomarkers as prognostic tools for diabetic retinopathy progression: a prospective study. Oxidative stress biomarkers in type 2 diabetes: pathophysiological insights, clinical relevance, and implications for diabetes complications. Insulin delivery modality and Ramadan fasting interruption, glycemic control, and fear of hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes: a prospective, multicenter study from Saudi Arabia. Volatilomics insights in older adults with diabetes: from metabolic mechanisms to precision geriatric medicine. Corrigendum to "A renal biopsy-anchored multi-marker signature involving AOPEP SNP-driven splicing, miR-27b-3p and glycated albumin for stratifying renal damage in type 2 diabetes". [DIAB 229 (2025) 112460].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1