Diagnosis of Peritonsillar Abscess-A Prospective Study Comparing Clinical with CT Findings in 133 Consecutive Patients.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Diagnostics Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.3390/diagnostics15020228
François Voruz, Rebecca Revol, Christophe Combescure, Yan Monnier, Minerva Becker, Nicolas Dulguerov
{"title":"Diagnosis of Peritonsillar Abscess-A Prospective Study Comparing Clinical with CT Findings in 133 Consecutive Patients.","authors":"François Voruz, Rebecca Revol, Christophe Combescure, Yan Monnier, Minerva Becker, Nicolas Dulguerov","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15020228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Peritonsillar abscess (PTA) is relatively common but challenging to diagnose clinically. Several clinical signs may be used, with unknown performances. We evaluated and compared the diagnostic performance of individual and combined clinical signs (<i>trismus</i>, <i>edema</i>, <i>pharynx immobility</i>, <i>uvula deviation</i>, <i>hot potato voice</i>, and <i>overall clinical impression</i>) assessed by an otolaryngologist and of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) to detect acute PTA. <b>Methods:</b> Prospective study in 133 consecutive adult patients (77 males, mean age = 33 years) with suspected clinical PTA and CT obtained in the emergency setting of a tertiary care hospital between November 2020 and October 2022. The standard of reference consisted of surgically proven pus within 24 h of CT or a favorable clinical evolution at 48 h without surgical intervention. <b>Results:</b> PTA was present in 117/133 (88%) patients, with no difference between mean age or sex distribution between the groups with and without PTA. None of the evaluated clinical signs were associated with PTA (OR = 1.26-5.43, <i>p</i> > 0.05), whereas the CT finding \"abscess\" was significantly associated with PTA (OR = 67.2, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). The sensitivity of individual clinical signs varied between 19.7% and 73.5%, and the sensitivity of CT was significantly higher for all clinical signs (95.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) except for <i>overall clinical impression</i> (97.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.7266). The specificity of clinical signs varied between 12.5% and 93.8%, and the specificity of CT was significantly higher (75%, <i>p</i> < 0.05) for <i>overall clinical impression</i> and <i>edema</i>. All clinical signs together yielded an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.677. <b>Conclusions:</b> In adults, clinical assessment alone using independent clinical signs and overall clinical impression does not allow a reliable diagnosis of PTA, even when performed by an otolaryngologist. CT is reliable in diagnosing PTA and, whenever available, should be the examination method of choice for diagnosing PTA, especially by a non-specialist.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11765337/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15020228","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peritonsillar abscess (PTA) is relatively common but challenging to diagnose clinically. Several clinical signs may be used, with unknown performances. We evaluated and compared the diagnostic performance of individual and combined clinical signs (trismus, edema, pharynx immobility, uvula deviation, hot potato voice, and overall clinical impression) assessed by an otolaryngologist and of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) to detect acute PTA. Methods: Prospective study in 133 consecutive adult patients (77 males, mean age = 33 years) with suspected clinical PTA and CT obtained in the emergency setting of a tertiary care hospital between November 2020 and October 2022. The standard of reference consisted of surgically proven pus within 24 h of CT or a favorable clinical evolution at 48 h without surgical intervention. Results: PTA was present in 117/133 (88%) patients, with no difference between mean age or sex distribution between the groups with and without PTA. None of the evaluated clinical signs were associated with PTA (OR = 1.26-5.43, p > 0.05), whereas the CT finding "abscess" was significantly associated with PTA (OR = 67.2, p < 0.0001). The sensitivity of individual clinical signs varied between 19.7% and 73.5%, and the sensitivity of CT was significantly higher for all clinical signs (95.7%, p < 0.0001) except for overall clinical impression (97.4%, p = 0.7266). The specificity of clinical signs varied between 12.5% and 93.8%, and the specificity of CT was significantly higher (75%, p < 0.05) for overall clinical impression and edema. All clinical signs together yielded an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.677. Conclusions: In adults, clinical assessment alone using independent clinical signs and overall clinical impression does not allow a reliable diagnosis of PTA, even when performed by an otolaryngologist. CT is reliable in diagnosing PTA and, whenever available, should be the examination method of choice for diagnosing PTA, especially by a non-specialist.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扁桃体周围脓肿的诊断:133例连续患者临床与CT表现比较的前瞻性研究。
背景:扁桃体周围脓肿(PTA)较为常见,但临床诊断具有挑战性。可能使用几种临床症状,但表现不明。我们评估并比较了由耳鼻喉科医师和对比增强计算机断层扫描(CT)诊断急性PTA的个体和综合临床症状(牙关紧闭、水肿、咽不动、小舌偏曲、热音和整体临床印象)的诊断性能。方法:对2020年11月至2022年10月在某三级医院急诊就诊的133例疑似临床PTA和CT的连续成年患者(男性77例,平均年龄33岁)进行前瞻性研究。参考标准包括CT后24小时内手术证实的脓液或48小时无手术干预的良好临床进展。结果:133例患者中有117例(88%)存在PTA,有PTA组和无PTA组的平均年龄和性别分布无差异。评估的临床体征与PTA均无相关性(OR = 1.26-5.43, p < 0.05),而CT发现“脓肿”与PTA有显著相关性(OR = 67.2, p < 0.0001)。个体临床征象的敏感性在19.7% ~ 73.5%之间,除整体临床印象(97.4%,p = 0.7266)外,CT对所有临床征象的敏感性均显著较高(95.7%,p < 0.0001)。临床征候的特异性在12.5% ~ 93.8%之间,其中CT对整体临床印象和水肿的特异性显著高于前者(75%,p < 0.05)。所有临床症状的曲线下面积(AUC) = 0.677。结论:在成人中,单独使用独立临床体征和总体临床印象的临床评估不能可靠地诊断PTA,即使由耳鼻喉科医生进行也是如此。CT在诊断PTA方面是可靠的,无论何时,都应作为诊断PTA的首选检查方法,特别是非专业人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
Beat-to-Beat QT Variability: A Population Study of the QT Variability Index Composition. Non-Exudative Macular Neovascularization in Various Acquired Macular Degenerations with Double- and Triple-Layer Sign on OCT. Impact of Maneuverability Constraints on Intraoral Scanner Performance. Infarction or Metabolic Breakdown? Longitudinally Extensive Diffusion-Restricted Lesions from the Medulla Oblongata to the Lumbar Spinal Cord. Advanced Deep Learning Models for Classifying Dental Diseases from Panoramic Radiographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1