Breast imaging readers’ performance in the PERFORMS test-set based assessment scheme within the MyPeBS international randomised study

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-19 DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.111938
Eleni Michalopoulou , Iain Darker , Valentina Iotti , Efrat Slonim , Harry J. de Koning , Rodrigo Alcantara Souza , Jean-Benoit Burrion , Sandrine De Montgolfier , Cécile Vissac-Sabatier , Michal Guindy , Pierpaolo Pattacini , Suzette Delaloge , Fiona J. Gilbert , Yan Chen , the MyPeBS Consortium
{"title":"Breast imaging readers’ performance in the PERFORMS test-set based assessment scheme within the MyPeBS international randomised study","authors":"Eleni Michalopoulou ,&nbsp;Iain Darker ,&nbsp;Valentina Iotti ,&nbsp;Efrat Slonim ,&nbsp;Harry J. de Koning ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Alcantara Souza ,&nbsp;Jean-Benoit Burrion ,&nbsp;Sandrine De Montgolfier ,&nbsp;Cécile Vissac-Sabatier ,&nbsp;Michal Guindy ,&nbsp;Pierpaolo Pattacini ,&nbsp;Suzette Delaloge ,&nbsp;Fiona J. Gilbert ,&nbsp;Yan Chen ,&nbsp;the MyPeBS Consortium","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.111938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>A survey conducted by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) in 2023 revealed significant variations in Quality Assurance (QA) practices across Europe. The UK encourages regular performance monitoring for screen readers. This study aimed to assess the variability in diagnostic performance among readers participating in a wider prospective randomised trial across multiple countries.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>In this retrospective multinational study, breast imaging readers from the MyPeBS clinical trial examined a test set of 40 challenging breast screening cases using the PERFORMS software, from March 2021 to February 2022. The challenging set, enriched with biopsy-proven cancers, aimed to differentiate readers by their level of diagnostic performance. Cancer detection and correct return to screen rates were calculated for each participant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 110 readers from 6 countries completed the PERFORMS test set, while 88 also completed an accompanying questionnaire collecting information about their breast screening work and experience. The study revealed variability in cancer detection rates (M = 73.6 %, SD = 19.7 %, range 0.0 %–100.0 %) and correct return to screen rates (M = 79.7 %, SD = 10.5 %, range 46.4 %–100.0 %). Outliers with extremely low cancer detection (2.7 % of participants) and correct return to screen rates (1.8 % of participants) were also identified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Breast imaging readers’ performance in test set-based assessments like PERFORMS can reflect real-world screening proficiency. The presence of outlier readers with low diagnostic performance on the test highlights the need for double reading and for standardised QA protocols to ensure patient safety and service efficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 111938"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25000245","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

A survey conducted by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) in 2023 revealed significant variations in Quality Assurance (QA) practices across Europe. The UK encourages regular performance monitoring for screen readers. This study aimed to assess the variability in diagnostic performance among readers participating in a wider prospective randomised trial across multiple countries.

Method

In this retrospective multinational study, breast imaging readers from the MyPeBS clinical trial examined a test set of 40 challenging breast screening cases using the PERFORMS software, from March 2021 to February 2022. The challenging set, enriched with biopsy-proven cancers, aimed to differentiate readers by their level of diagnostic performance. Cancer detection and correct return to screen rates were calculated for each participant.

Results

A total of 110 readers from 6 countries completed the PERFORMS test set, while 88 also completed an accompanying questionnaire collecting information about their breast screening work and experience. The study revealed variability in cancer detection rates (M = 73.6 %, SD = 19.7 %, range 0.0 %–100.0 %) and correct return to screen rates (M = 79.7 %, SD = 10.5 %, range 46.4 %–100.0 %). Outliers with extremely low cancer detection (2.7 % of participants) and correct return to screen rates (1.8 % of participants) were also identified.

Conclusions

Breast imaging readers’ performance in test set-based assessments like PERFORMS can reflect real-world screening proficiency. The presence of outlier readers with low diagnostic performance on the test highlights the need for double reading and for standardised QA protocols to ensure patient safety and service efficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MyPeBS国际随机研究中基于perform测试集的评估方案中乳腺成像阅读器的表现。
目的:欧洲乳腺成像学会(EUSOBI)于2023年进行的一项调查显示,欧洲各地的质量保证(QA)实践存在显著差异。英国鼓励定期监测屏幕阅读器的性能。本研究旨在评估参与多个国家更广泛的前瞻性随机试验的读者在诊断表现方面的可变性。方法:在这项回顾性跨国研究中,来自MyPeBS临床试验的乳房成像阅读器使用perform软件检查了40例具有挑战性的乳房筛查病例,时间为2021年3月至2022年2月。具有挑战性的一组,丰富了活检证实的癌症,旨在通过他们的诊断表现水平区分读者。计算每个参与者的癌症检出率和正确返回筛查率。结果:来自6个国家的110名读者完成了perform测试集,同时88名读者还完成了一份附带的问卷调查,收集了他们的乳房筛查工作和经历的信息。研究显示癌症检出率(M = 73.6%, SD = 19.7%,范围0.0% - 100.0%)和正确的筛查率(M = 79.7%, SD = 10.5%,范围46.4% - 100.0%)存在差异。癌症检出率极低(2.7%的参与者)和正确的筛查返回率(1.8%的参与者)的异常值也被确定。结论:乳房成像阅读器在基于测试集的评估中的表现,如perform,可以反映真实世界的筛查熟练程度。在测试中诊断性能较低的异常读数器的存在突出了双重读取和标准化QA协议的需要,以确保患者安全和服务效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Added diagnostic value of SPECT/CT for detecting periapical and periodontal inflammation in patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw Benchmarking large language models for quality control of chest radiographs and CT reports: a retrospective multimodal study Fifty-percent diluted contrast medium provides acceptable image quality in cerebral angiography A CT-based model integrating deep learning features radiomics and body composition for preoperative prediction of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: a multicenter study Dual-layer spectral-detector CT-derived quantifications for preoperative identification of perineural invasion in gastric cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1