Specific symptomatology profile associated with treatment resistant depression: A multicentric study from the Group for the Study of Resistant Depression with a focus on sex

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of affective disorders Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2025.01.120
Maria Luca , Antonina Luca , Antonino Messina , Lucie Bartova , Siegfried Kasper , Joseph Zohar , Daniel Souery , Stuart Montgomery , Panagiotis Ferentinos , Dan Rujescu , Julien Mendlewicz , Raffaella Zanardi , Raffaele Ferri , Bartolo Lanuzza , Francesco Benedetti , Basilio Pecorino , Bernhard T. Baune , Giuseppe Fanelli , Chiara Fabbri , Alessandro Serretti
{"title":"Specific symptomatology profile associated with treatment resistant depression: A multicentric study from the Group for the Study of Resistant Depression with a focus on sex","authors":"Maria Luca ,&nbsp;Antonina Luca ,&nbsp;Antonino Messina ,&nbsp;Lucie Bartova ,&nbsp;Siegfried Kasper ,&nbsp;Joseph Zohar ,&nbsp;Daniel Souery ,&nbsp;Stuart Montgomery ,&nbsp;Panagiotis Ferentinos ,&nbsp;Dan Rujescu ,&nbsp;Julien Mendlewicz ,&nbsp;Raffaella Zanardi ,&nbsp;Raffaele Ferri ,&nbsp;Bartolo Lanuzza ,&nbsp;Francesco Benedetti ,&nbsp;Basilio Pecorino ,&nbsp;Bernhard T. Baune ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Fanelli ,&nbsp;Chiara Fabbri ,&nbsp;Alessandro Serretti","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.01.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Clinical predictors of treatment-resistant depression could improve treatment strategies. Depressive symptom profiles at baseline are potential outcome predictors, but little evidence is available, and sex-specific profiles have been scarcely investigated.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Baseline symptom scores of 1294 patients with major depressive disorder were assessed by the Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale (MADRS) as part of a multicenter study by the “Group for the Studies of Resistant Depression”. Treatment outcomes were assessed according to the MADRS after ≥4 weeks of naturalistic treatment. We tested if individual MADRS item scores at baseline were associated with treatment outcome in the whole sample and in sex-stratified subgroups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A specific baseline symptom profile was associated with non-response in the whole sample. In particular, apparent and reported sadness, reduced sleep, lassitude, inability to feel, and pessimistic thoughts were the only MADRS items that scored higher at baseline in patients with subsequent lack of response. In the sex-stratified analysis, females showed a similar profile overall, however they showed higher baseline levels of inner tension, inability to feel, and pessimistic thoughts compared to males, and these symptoms were associated with lack of response in females but not in males. Neurovegetative symptoms were poorly predictive. Overall baseline severity related to poor response.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>This is a post-hoc analysis. The naturalistic design of the study with a retrospective assessment is potential limitations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A specific baseline symptom profile characterized by higher sadness, reduced sleep and anhedonic features may be indicative of poor treatment outcome. Females showed a distinctive baseline profile associated with poor response.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"375 ","pages":"Pages 249-255"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032725001405","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Clinical predictors of treatment-resistant depression could improve treatment strategies. Depressive symptom profiles at baseline are potential outcome predictors, but little evidence is available, and sex-specific profiles have been scarcely investigated.

Methods

Baseline symptom scores of 1294 patients with major depressive disorder were assessed by the Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale (MADRS) as part of a multicenter study by the “Group for the Studies of Resistant Depression”. Treatment outcomes were assessed according to the MADRS after ≥4 weeks of naturalistic treatment. We tested if individual MADRS item scores at baseline were associated with treatment outcome in the whole sample and in sex-stratified subgroups.

Results

A specific baseline symptom profile was associated with non-response in the whole sample. In particular, apparent and reported sadness, reduced sleep, lassitude, inability to feel, and pessimistic thoughts were the only MADRS items that scored higher at baseline in patients with subsequent lack of response. In the sex-stratified analysis, females showed a similar profile overall, however they showed higher baseline levels of inner tension, inability to feel, and pessimistic thoughts compared to males, and these symptoms were associated with lack of response in females but not in males. Neurovegetative symptoms were poorly predictive. Overall baseline severity related to poor response.

Limitations

This is a post-hoc analysis. The naturalistic design of the study with a retrospective assessment is potential limitations.

Conclusion

A specific baseline symptom profile characterized by higher sadness, reduced sleep and anhedonic features may be indicative of poor treatment outcome. Females showed a distinctive baseline profile associated with poor response.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与难治性抑郁症相关的特定症状:一项来自难治性抑郁症研究小组的多中心研究,重点关注性别。
背景:难治性抑郁症的临床预测因子可以改善治疗策略。基线时的抑郁症状概况是潜在的预后预测因素,但证据很少,而且性别特异性的概况几乎没有调查。方法:采用Montgomery-Åsberg抑郁评定量表(MADRS)对1294例重度抑郁症患者进行基线症状评分,作为“难治性抑郁症研究小组”多中心研究的一部分。≥4 周自然治疗后,根据MADRS评估治疗结果。我们测试了在整个样本和按性别分层的亚组中,MADRS单项评分在基线时是否与治疗结果相关。结果:在整个样本中,一个特定的基线症状与无反应相关。特别是,明显的和报告的悲伤,睡眠减少,倦怠,无法感觉和悲观的想法是唯一的MADRS项目在基线时得分较高的患者随后缺乏反应。在性别分层分析中,女性总体上表现出相似的特征,但与男性相比,她们表现出更高的内在紧张、无法感受和悲观思想的基线水平,这些症状与女性缺乏反应有关,而与男性无关。神经植物性症状的预测能力较差。总体基线严重程度与不良反应相关。局限性:这是一个事后分析。该研究的自然设计和回顾性评估是潜在的局限性。结论:以悲伤情绪升高、睡眠减少和快感缺乏特征为特征的特定基线症状可能表明治疗结果不佳。女性表现出与不良反应相关的独特基线特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
期刊最新文献
Classification and discrimination of emotion dysregulation disorders using machine learning. Does mental health coaching improve efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression? A pilot randomized controlled trial and benchmarking study. Multimodal machine learning models for predicting remission in major depressive disorder using clinical data, blood biomarkers, and DNA methylation. EEG microstate dynamics reveal progressive sensorimotor network dysfunction across levels of anxiety severity in drug-naïve major depressive disorder. Differential effects of individualized vs. fixed-frequency tACS on clinical and EEG outcomes in major depressive disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1