Design and early progress of the Comparison of Anticoagulation and anti-Platelet Therapies for Intracranial Vascular Atherostenosis (CAPTIVA) trial.

IF 8.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY International Journal of Stroke Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1177/17474930241313301
Brian L Hoh, Renee' H Martin, Sharon D Yeatts, Tanya N Turan, Renee M Boyette, Stephanie McLaren, Lesley Butler, Keith R Peters, Jessica Smith, Larisa H Cavallari, Ashley M Wabnitz, Noor Sabagha, Christian Unger, Jamey S Frasure, Joseph P Broderick, Marc I Chimowitz
{"title":"Design and early progress of the Comparison of Anticoagulation and anti-Platelet Therapies for Intracranial Vascular Atherostenosis (CAPTIVA) trial.","authors":"Brian L Hoh, Renee' H Martin, Sharon D Yeatts, Tanya N Turan, Renee M Boyette, Stephanie McLaren, Lesley Butler, Keith R Peters, Jessica Smith, Larisa H Cavallari, Ashley M Wabnitz, Noor Sabagha, Christian Unger, Jamey S Frasure, Joseph P Broderick, Marc I Chimowitz","doi":"10.1177/17474930241313301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The usual antithrombotic treatment for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) consists of dual treatment with clopidogrel and aspirin for 90 days followed by aspirin alone but the risk of recurrent stroke remains high up to 12 months. The Comparison of Anticoagulation and anti-Platelet Therapies for Intracranial Vascular Atherostenosis (CAPTIVA) trial was designed to determine whether other combinations of dual antithrombotic therapy are superior to clopidogrel and aspirin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CAPTIVA is an ongoing, prospective, double-blinded, three-arm clinical trial at over 100 sites in the United States and Canada that will randomize 1683 high-risk subjects with a symptomatic infarct attributed to 70-99% stenosis of a major intracranial artery to 12 months of treatment with (1) ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose, then 90 mg twice daily), (2) low-dose rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily), or (3) clopidogrel (600 mg loading dose, then 75 mg daily). All subjects receive aspirin (81 mg daily), intensive risk factor management, and will undergo blinded <i>CYP2C19</i> genotype analysis. The primary goal of the trial is to determine whether rivaroxaban or ticagrelor or both are superior to clopidogrel for lowering the primary endpoint (ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), or vascular death) within 12 months. A prespecified interim safety analysis will be conducted when the first 450 randomized subjects have been followed for 12 months to evaluate the risk of major hemorrhage in the rivaroxaban and ticagrelor arms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Enrollment began in August 2022 and, as of 26 June 2024, the 450th subject was randomized into the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CAPTIVA is evaluating two alternative dual antithrombotic therapies to clopidogrel and aspirin to maximize the chance of establishing more effective antithrombotic therapy for symptomatic ICAS, one of the most common and high-risk cerebrovascular diseases worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"623-628"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12092178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930241313301","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The usual antithrombotic treatment for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) consists of dual treatment with clopidogrel and aspirin for 90 days followed by aspirin alone but the risk of recurrent stroke remains high up to 12 months. The Comparison of Anticoagulation and anti-Platelet Therapies for Intracranial Vascular Atherostenosis (CAPTIVA) trial was designed to determine whether other combinations of dual antithrombotic therapy are superior to clopidogrel and aspirin.

Methods: CAPTIVA is an ongoing, prospective, double-blinded, three-arm clinical trial at over 100 sites in the United States and Canada that will randomize 1683 high-risk subjects with a symptomatic infarct attributed to 70-99% stenosis of a major intracranial artery to 12 months of treatment with (1) ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose, then 90 mg twice daily), (2) low-dose rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily), or (3) clopidogrel (600 mg loading dose, then 75 mg daily). All subjects receive aspirin (81 mg daily), intensive risk factor management, and will undergo blinded CYP2C19 genotype analysis. The primary goal of the trial is to determine whether rivaroxaban or ticagrelor or both are superior to clopidogrel for lowering the primary endpoint (ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), or vascular death) within 12 months. A prespecified interim safety analysis will be conducted when the first 450 randomized subjects have been followed for 12 months to evaluate the risk of major hemorrhage in the rivaroxaban and ticagrelor arms.

Results: Enrollment began in August 2022 and, as of 26 June 2024, the 450th subject was randomized into the study.

Conclusion: CAPTIVA is evaluating two alternative dual antithrombotic therapies to clopidogrel and aspirin to maximize the chance of establishing more effective antithrombotic therapy for symptomatic ICAS, one of the most common and high-risk cerebrovascular diseases worldwide.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颅内血管粥样硬化症抗凝疗法和抗血小板疗法比较试验(CAPTIVA)的设计和早期进展。
背景:对于症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄(ICAS),通常的抗血栓治疗包括氯吡格雷和阿司匹林的双重治疗90天,然后单独使用阿司匹林,但复发卒中的风险高达12个月。颅内血管粥样硬化的抗凝和抗血小板治疗比较(CAPTIVA)试验旨在确定其他双重抗血栓治疗组合是否优于氯吡格雷和阿司匹林。CAPTIVA是一项正在进行的、前瞻性的、双盲的、三组临床试验,在美国和加拿大的100多个地点进行,将1683名因颅内主要动脉70-99%狭窄而出现症状性梗死的高风险受试者随机分组,接受12个月的治疗(1)替格瑞洛(180mg负荷剂量,然后90mg,每日两次),(2)低剂量利伐沙班(2.5 mg,每日两次),或(3)氯吡格雷(600mg负荷剂量,然后75mg,每日)。所有受试者均接受阿司匹林(每日81 mg),强化危险因素管理,并进行CYP2C19基因型盲法分析。该试验的主要目的是确定在12个月内,利伐沙班或替格瑞洛或两者在降低主要终点(缺血性卒中、脑出血或血管性死亡)方面是否优于氯吡格雷。当第一批450名随机受试者随访12个月后,将进行预先指定的中期安全性分析,以评估利伐沙班和替格瑞洛组大出血的风险。结果:入组于2022年8月开始,截至2024年6月26日,第450名受试者被随机纳入研究。结论:CAPTIVA正在评估两种替代氯吡格雷和阿司匹林的双重抗血栓治疗方法,以最大限度地为症状性ICAS(世界上最常见和高风险的脑血管疾病之一)建立更有效的抗血栓治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Stroke
International Journal of Stroke 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke with Large Infarct in Randomized Trials versus Clinical Practice: Comparison of the TENSION Trial and the German Stroke Registry. Stroke During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period: A Nationwide Population-Based Study in South Korea. Stroke and Climate Change: A World Stroke Organization Scientific Statement. Higher lithium exposure in groundwater is associated with reduced stroke incidence and mortality. Prevalence, time-course and predictors of depression after transient ischaemic attack: a systematic review, meta-analysis and validation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1