International Journal of Stroke最新文献

Background: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is the cornerstone treatment for the acute ischemic stroke (AIS) within 4.5 h after onset. Current guidelines recommend administering antiplatelet medications 24 h after IVT. However, vascular reocclusion is a common occurrence after IVT. Tirofiban, a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist, can help deter macrovascular reocclusion, prevent microvascular thrombosis, and enhance cerebral blood flow.

Objective: This trial aims to assess whether early administration of tirofiban can improve clinical outcomes in patients with AIS who received IVT.

Methods and design: The Advancing Stroke Safety and Efficacy through Early Tirofiban Administration after Intravenous Thrombolysis (ASSET IT) Trial is an investigator-initiated, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter study. Up to 832 eligible patients will be consecutively randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either intravenous tirofiban or placebo over a period of 2 years across 38 stroke centers in China.

Outcomes: The primary endpoint is excellent functional status at day 90, defined as a modified Rankin Score of 0-1. Primary safety endpoints include symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage at 24 h and mortality at 90 days.

Trial registry number: NCT06134622 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Background: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is recommended for secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke. However, data on long-term results are limited. We aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of transcatheter PFO closure and predict neurologic recurrence.

Methods: Data from patients undergoing PFO closure between 2010 and 2015 were collected to assess the combined endpoint of transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke, or death from stroke at short- and long-term follow-up.

Results: 330 patients were included, mean age was 49 (±12) years, and 55.5% were male. Before PFO closure, 86% experienced a stroke and 19% multiple neurological events. Procedure-related complications occurred in 2.4% of patients. Over a median follow-up of 10 years, the combined endpoint occurred in 3.6%, with a recurrence rate of 0.38 per 100 patient-years. Freedom from the combined endpoint at 5 and 10 years was 97.5% and 96.2%, respectively. New-onset atrial fibrillation was detected in 3%. The Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score (adjHR: 0.68; p = 0.032), the PFO-Associated Stroke Causal Likelihood (PASCAL) classification system (adjHR: 0.37; p = 0.042), and a history of prior neurological events (adjHR: 9.94; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of future recurrent neurologic events. Age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors did not influence outcomes.

Conclusion: In this real-world cohort, transcatheter PFO closure was associated with low long-term recurrence of neurologic events, especially cryptogenic strokes. The RoPE score, the PASCAL score, and history of previous neurological events were predictive of recurrent events. This study supports the safety and efficacy of PFO closure for secondary prevention of cryptogenic strokes, and underscores the importance of patient selection.

Background: Whether prehospital blood pressure control improves outcomes among patients with acute ischemic stroke is uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of prehospital blood pressure reduction treatment in patients with ischemic stroke.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials that compared prehospital blood pressure reduction treatment with usual treatment or no treatment in patients with stroke. The primary outcome was functional outcome, assessed with the distribution of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days, while secondary outcome was mortality at 90 days.

Results: Of 428 studies reviewed, three were appropriate for analysis, totaling 3878 patients. In patients with ischemic stroke, prehospital blood pressure reduction treatment was associated with higher mRS scores at 90 days (common odds ratio (OR) for worse mRS, OR: 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-1.49) and increased risk of mortality at 90 days (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.02-1.61) compared with the usual treatment.

Conclusion: In patients with ischemic stroke, prehospital blood pressure reduction treatment was associated with a higher likelihood of poor functional outcome and an elevated risk of mortality.

Background: There is yet no randomized controlled evidence that mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is superior to best medical treatment in patients with large vessel occlusion but minor stroke symptoms (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) <6). Prior studies of patients with admission NIHSS scores ≥6 observed unfavorable functional outcomes despite successful recanalization, commonly termed as futile recanalization (FR), in up to 50% of cases.

Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of FR in patients with minor stroke and identify associated patient-specific risk factors.

Methods: Our multicenter cohort study screened all patients prospectively enrolled in the German Stroke Registry Endovascular Treatment from 2015 to 2021 (n = 13,082). Included were patients who underwent MT for anterior circulation vessel occlusion with a baseline NIHSS score of <6 and successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) scores of 2b-3). FR was defined by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 2-6 at 90 days. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore factors associated with FR.

Results: A total of 674 patients met the inclusion criteria. FR occurred in 268 (40%) patients. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicates that higher age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.04 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.02-1.06)), pre-stroke mRS 1 (aOR = 2.70 (95% CI = 1.51-4.84)), transfer from admission hospital to comprehensive stroke center (aOR = 1.67 (95% CI = 1.08-2.56)), longer time from symptom onset/last seen well to admission (aOR = 1.02 (95% CI = 1.00-1.04)), MT under general anesthesia (aOR = 1.78 (95% CI = 1.13-2.82)), higher NIHSS after 24 h (aOR = 1.09 (95% CI = 1.05-1.14)), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (aOR = 16.88 (95% CI = 2.03-140.14)) increased the odds of FR. There was no significant difference in primary outcome between achieving mTICI score of 2b or 3.

Conclusions: Unfavorable functional outcomes despite successful vessel recanalization were frequent in acute ischemic stroke patients with low NIHSS scores on admission. We provide patient-specific risk factors that indicate an increased risk of FR and should be considered when treating patients with minor stroke.

Data accessibility statement: The data that support the findings of our study are available on reasonable request after approval of the German Stroke Registry (GSR) steering committee.

Background: According to the literature, about one third of patients with brain ischemic symptoms lasting <24 hours, which are classified as TIAs according to the traditional "time-based" definition, show the presence of acute ischemic lesions at neuroimaging. Recent evidence has shown that the presence of acute ischemic lesions at neuroimaging may impact on the outcome of patients with transient ischemic symptoms treated with dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT). This uncertainty is even more compelling in recent years as short-term DAPT has become the standard treatment for any non-cardioembolic TIA or minor ischemic stroke.

Methods: This is a pre-specified subgroup analysis from a prospective multicenter real-world study (READAPT). The analysis included patients with time-based TIA - i.e. those with ischemic symptoms lasting <24 hours - who started DAPT. In the whole population, we assessed the presence of acute brain ischemic lesions at neuroimaging and their association with the ABCD2 score. To assess the impact of acute brain ischemic lesions on 90-day prognosis, we performed a propensity score matching of patients with and without those lesions. We adopted a primary effectiveness outcome which was a composite of new stroke/TIA events and death due to vascular causes at 90 days.

Results: We included 517 patients - 324 (62.7%) male - with a median (interquartile range - IQR) age of 74 (IQR 65-81) years; 144 patients (27.9%) had acute brain ischemic lesions at neuroimaging. The proportion of patients with brain ischemic lesions did not vary according to the ABCD2 score. At follow-up, 4 patients with brain ischemic lesions (2.8%) and 21 patients without lesions (5.6%) reported the primary effectiveness outcome, which was similar between the groups before (p=0.178) and after matching (p=0.518).

Conclusions: In our population, patients with transient ischemic symptoms and acute ischemic lesions at brain MRI had a risk of recurrent ischemic events similar to those without lesions. The risk of recurrent ischemic events was low in both groups.

Background: Short-term dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) is superior to single antiplatelet treatment (SAPT) for secondary prevention in non-cardioembolic minor ischemic stroke and high-risk TIA. As the real-world use of DAPT is broader than in trials, it is important to clarify its benefit/risk profile in a diverse population.

Methods: Post-hoc analysis of prospectively collected data from the READAPT cohort and 3 prospective stroke registries including patients with mild-to-moderate (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score 0-10) ischemic stroke receiving early DAPT or SAPT. The primary effectiveness outcome was 90-day return to pre-stroke neurological functioning using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Secondary effectiveness outcomes were 90-day mRS shift, new ischemic stroke/TIA, vascular and all-cause death, 24-h early neurological improvement or deterioration. The safety outcome was 90-day intracranial hemorrhage.

Results: We matched 1008 patients treated with DAPT and 1008 treated with SAPT. Compared to SAPT, patients treated with DAPT showed higher likelihood of 90-day primary effectiveness outcome (87.5% versus 84.4%, risk difference 3.1% [95%CI 0.1%-6.1%];p=0.047, risk ratio 1.03 [95%CI 1.01-1.07];p=0.043) and higher rate of 24-h early neurological improvement (25.3% versus 15.4%, risk difference 9.9% [95%CI 6.4%-13.4%];p<0.001, risk ratio 1.65 [95%CI 1.37-1.97];p<0.001). No differences were observed for other study outcomes. Subgroup analysis confirmed benefit of DAPT over SAPT for primary effectiveness outcome in patients with moderate stroke, those treated with intravenous thrombolysis and who received antiplatelet loading dose.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that DAPT use might be safe and more effective than SAPT even in the real-world and in patients who do not strictly fulfill criteria of landmark large clinical trials.

Background: Despite the proven efficacy of telestroke in improving clinical outcomes by providing access to specialized expertise and allowing rapid expert hyperacute stroke management and decision-making, detailed operational evidence is scarce, especially for less developed or lower income regions.

Aim: We aimed to map the global telestroke landscape and characterize existing networks.

Methods: We employed a four-tiered approach to comprehensively identify telestroke networks, primarily involving engagement with national stroke experts, stroke societies, and international stroke authorities. A carefully designed questionnaire was then distributed to the leaders of all identified networks to assess these networks' structures, processes, and outcomes.

Results: We identified 254 telestroke networks distributed across 67 countries. High-income countries (HICs) concentrated 175 (69%) of the networks. No evidence of telestroke services was found in 58 (30%) countries. From the identified networks, 88 (34%) completed the survey, being 61 (71%) located in HICs. Network setup was highly heterogeneous, ranging from 17 (22%) networks with more than 20 affiliated hospitals, providing thousands of annual consultations using purpose-built highly specialized technology, to 11 (13%) networks with fewer than 120 consultations annually using generic videoconferencing equipment. Real-time video and image transfer was employed in 64 (75%) networks, while 62 (74%) conducting quality monitoring. Most networks established in the past 3 years were located in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Conclusion: This comprehensive global survey of telestroke networks found significant variation in network coverage, setup, and technology use. Most services are in HICs, and a few services are in LMICs, although an emerging trend of new networks in these regions marks a pivotal moment in global telestroke care. The wide variation in quality monitoring practices across networks, with many failing to report key performance metrics, underscores the urgent need for standardized, resource-appropriate, quality assurance measures that can be adapted to diverse settings.

Background: The recurrence rate of strokes associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) can be substantially reduced through the administration of oral anticoagulants. However, previous studies have not demonstrated a clear benefit from the universal application of oral anticoagulants in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source. Timely detection of AF remains a challenge in patients with stroke.

Aim: This study aims to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) model to accurately identify patients with AF using a 12-lead sinus-rhythm electrocardiogram (ECG) recorded around the time of the first ischemic stroke. Additionally, this study also evaluates the model's ability to predict future occurrence of AF.

Methods: A CNN model was trained with ECG data from patients at Taipei Veterans General Hospital. External validation was performed on ischemic stroke patients from National Taiwan University Hospital. The model's performance was assessed for detecting AF at the stroke event and predicting future AF occurrences.

Results: The model demonstrated an area under curve (AUC) of 0.91 for internal validation and 0.69 for external validation in identifying AF at the stroke event, with sensitivity and negative predictive value both achieving 97%. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of patients without a prior diagnosis of AF revealed a significant increase in future AF incidence among the high-risk group identified by the model (adjusted hazard ratio: 4.06; 95% confidence interval: 2.74-6.00).

Conclusions: The CNN model effectively identifies AF in stroke patients using 12-lead ECGs and predicts future AF events, facilitating early anticoagulation therapy and potentially reducing recurrent stroke risk. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Background: Non-contrast cranial computed tomography (NCCT) and CT angiogram (CTA) have become essential for endovascular treatment (EVT) in acute stroke. Patient selection may improve when CT perfusion (CTP) imaging is also added for patient selection. We aimed to analyze the effects of implementing CTP in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients' treatment to assess whether stroke outcomes differ in the late window.

Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Sciences databases to obtain articles related to CTA and CTP in EVT. Collected patient data were split into two groups: the CTP and control (NCCT + CTA) cohorts. Primary outcomes evaluated were modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages (sICHs), mortality, and successful recanalization.

Results: There were 14 studies with 5809 total patients in the final analysis: 2602 received CTP and 3202 were in the control group. CTP/CTA patients showed significantly lower rates of 90-day stroke-related mortality (odds ratio (OR) = 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.60-0.87, p < 0.01) and significantly higher successful recanalization (OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.06-1.94, p < 0.01) compared with CTA-only patients. Analysis of other outcomes including functional independence (mRS = 0-2), critical times, and intracranial hemorrhages was non-significant (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The study highlights the usefulness of CTP-guided therapy as a supplementary tool in EVT selection in the late window. Although the addition of CTP resulted in lower mortality, the favorable outcomes did not improve. Further evidence is required to establish a clearer understanding of the potential advantages or limitations of incorporating CTP in stroke imaging.