Comparison of continuous non-invasive blood pressure measurement using Vitalstream™ to invasive Intraarterial pressure in pediatric surgery

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Clinical Anesthesia Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111763
Karen R. Boretsky M.D., FASA , Viviane G. Nasr M.D., M.P.H , Douglas Atkinson MD , Martin Baruch Ph.D
{"title":"Comparison of continuous non-invasive blood pressure measurement using Vitalstream™ to invasive Intraarterial pressure in pediatric surgery","authors":"Karen R. Boretsky M.D., FASA ,&nbsp;Viviane G. Nasr M.D., M.P.H ,&nbsp;Douglas Atkinson MD ,&nbsp;Martin Baruch Ph.D","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Accurate blood pressure monitoring is essential in many clinical scenarios for adults and children and, when continuous measurement is critical, necessitates the insertion of an arterial line. A novel continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring device using a pulse contour algorithm (Pulse Decomposition Analysis), Vitalstream™, is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for use in adults. In this study the performance and accuracy of the device compared to intraarterial blood pressure monitoring were assessed in children ages 2–17 undergoing major surgeries. We report the results using comparison to aspects of the recently published ISO 81060–3:2022 standard for continuous automated blood pressure measurement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>31 children ages 2–17 years scheduled for major surgery requiring invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring were consented to participate. Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure readings were obtained from both systems during at least thirty minutes of simultaneous monitoring during hemodynamically stable periods of the surgical procedure and statistically compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The correlations of systolic and, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures were, respectively, 0.77, 0.68 and 0.7. The Bland-Altman comparisons yielded bias of −3.79 (9.74) mmHg, 1.72 (8.45) mmHg and 2.41 (8.75) mmHg respectively, for systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures, (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001 for all comparisons). Concordances for systole, diastole and MAP were, respectively, 0.82, 0.85 and 0.83.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Most values fell within +/−20mmhg of the corresponding arterial line values. While this meets the basic requirement for such devices published by professional societies, clinicians will need to be aware of the potential variances and make clinical decisions accordingly. The Vitalstream™ may offer low risk, accurate continuous pressure monitoring in children ages 2–17.</div><div>Clinical <span><span>trials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>: <span><span>NCT04817137</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div><div>The trial was registered at <span><span>clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (NCT048I7173).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 111763"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025000236","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Accurate blood pressure monitoring is essential in many clinical scenarios for adults and children and, when continuous measurement is critical, necessitates the insertion of an arterial line. A novel continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring device using a pulse contour algorithm (Pulse Decomposition Analysis), Vitalstream™, is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for use in adults. In this study the performance and accuracy of the device compared to intraarterial blood pressure monitoring were assessed in children ages 2–17 undergoing major surgeries. We report the results using comparison to aspects of the recently published ISO 81060–3:2022 standard for continuous automated blood pressure measurement.

Methods

31 children ages 2–17 years scheduled for major surgery requiring invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring were consented to participate. Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure readings were obtained from both systems during at least thirty minutes of simultaneous monitoring during hemodynamically stable periods of the surgical procedure and statistically compared.

Results

The correlations of systolic and, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures were, respectively, 0.77, 0.68 and 0.7. The Bland-Altman comparisons yielded bias of −3.79 (9.74) mmHg, 1.72 (8.45) mmHg and 2.41 (8.75) mmHg respectively, for systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures, (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Concordances for systole, diastole and MAP were, respectively, 0.82, 0.85 and 0.83.

Conclusions

Most values fell within +/−20mmhg of the corresponding arterial line values. While this meets the basic requirement for such devices published by professional societies, clinicians will need to be aware of the potential variances and make clinical decisions accordingly. The Vitalstream™ may offer low risk, accurate continuous pressure monitoring in children ages 2–17.
Clinical trials.gov: NCT04817137
The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT048I7173).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of anesthesia program that graduating medical students find important: A cross-sectional survey Concerns in comparing supraglottic and subglottic jet ventilation: Duration, monitoring, and patient selection matter Association between baseline cerebral oxygenation and postoperative outcomes in older noncardiac surgical patients: An exploratory observational study Efficacy and safety of prone positioning in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): A systematic review and meta-analysis Probiotics as a possible novel therapeutic option to mitigate perioperative neurocognitive disorders: A review exploring the latest research findings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1