Impact of Vein Wall Hyperelasticity and Blood Flow Turbulence on Hemodynamic Parameters in the Inferior Vena Cava with a Filter.

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Micromachines Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.3390/mi16010051
Jafar Moradicheghamahi, Debkalpa Goswami
{"title":"Impact of Vein Wall Hyperelasticity and Blood Flow Turbulence on Hemodynamic Parameters in the Inferior Vena Cava with a Filter.","authors":"Jafar Moradicheghamahi, Debkalpa Goswami","doi":"10.3390/mi16010051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are vital in preventing pulmonary embolism (PE) by trapping large blood clots, especially in patients unsuitable for anticoagulation. In this study, the accuracy of two common simplifying assumptions in numerical studies of IVC filters-the rigid wall assumption and the laminar flow model-is examined, contrasting them with more realistic hyperelastic wall and turbulent flow models. Using fluid-structure interaction (FSI) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques, the investigation focuses on three hemodynamic parameters: time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), and relative residence time (RRT). Simulations are conducted with varying sizes of clots captured in the filter. The findings show that, in regions of high wall shear stress, the rigid wall model predicted higher TAWSS values, suggesting an increased disease risk compared to the hyperelastic model. However, the laminar and turbulent flow models did not show significant differences in TAWSS predictions. Conversely, in areas of low wall shear stress, the rigid wall model indicated lower OSI and RRT, hinting at a reduced risk compared to the hyperelastic model, with this discrepancy being more evident with larger clots. While the predictions for OSI and TAWSS were closely aligned for both laminar and turbulent flows, divergences in RRT predictions became apparent, especially in scenarios with very large clots.</p>","PeriodicalId":18508,"journal":{"name":"Micromachines","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11767820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Micromachines","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16010051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are vital in preventing pulmonary embolism (PE) by trapping large blood clots, especially in patients unsuitable for anticoagulation. In this study, the accuracy of two common simplifying assumptions in numerical studies of IVC filters-the rigid wall assumption and the laminar flow model-is examined, contrasting them with more realistic hyperelastic wall and turbulent flow models. Using fluid-structure interaction (FSI) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques, the investigation focuses on three hemodynamic parameters: time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), and relative residence time (RRT). Simulations are conducted with varying sizes of clots captured in the filter. The findings show that, in regions of high wall shear stress, the rigid wall model predicted higher TAWSS values, suggesting an increased disease risk compared to the hyperelastic model. However, the laminar and turbulent flow models did not show significant differences in TAWSS predictions. Conversely, in areas of low wall shear stress, the rigid wall model indicated lower OSI and RRT, hinting at a reduced risk compared to the hyperelastic model, with this discrepancy being more evident with larger clots. While the predictions for OSI and TAWSS were closely aligned for both laminar and turbulent flows, divergences in RRT predictions became apparent, especially in scenarios with very large clots.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉壁高弹性和血流湍流对下腔静脉滤过器血流动力学参数的影响。
下腔静脉(IVC)过滤器在防止肺栓塞(PE)中至关重要,特别是在不适合抗凝治疗的患者中。在本研究中,检验了IVC滤波器数值研究中常用的两种简化假设——刚性壁面假设和层流模型的准确性,并将它们与更现实的超弹性壁面和湍流模型进行了对比。利用流固耦合(FSI)和计算流体动力学(CFD)技术,研究重点是三个血流动力学参数:时间平均壁面剪切应力(TAWSS)、振荡剪切指数(OSI)和相对停留时间(RRT)。对过滤器中捕获的不同大小的凝块进行了模拟。研究结果表明,在高壁剪应力区域,刚性壁模型预测更高的TAWSS值,表明与超弹性模型相比,疾病风险增加。然而,层流和湍流模式在TAWSS预测中没有显着差异。相反,在低壁剪切应力区域,刚性壁模型显示较低的OSI和RRT,暗示与超弹性模型相比风险降低,这种差异在较大的血栓中更为明显。虽然对OSI和TAWSS的预测在层流和湍流中都非常一致,但RRT预测的分歧变得明显,特别是在有非常大的凝块的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Micromachines
Micromachines NANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY-INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.70%
发文量
1862
审稿时长
16.31 days
期刊介绍: Micromachines (ISSN 2072-666X) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to micro-scaled machines and micromachinery. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
期刊最新文献
2D and 3D Interdigital Capacitors and Bias Tees Technologies on MnM Interposer for mmWave Applications. Multi-Objective Optimization and Performance Evaluation of Rhombic Pin-Fin Microchannel Heat Sinks with Diverse Manifold Configurations. Influence of Inlet Splitter Structure on Flow and Heat Transfer Performance in Microchannel Heat Exchangers. Single-Imaging Parasite-Quantification Microfluidic Device for Detection and Analysis of Schistosoma Eggs in Urine. A Low-Noise MEMS Accelerometer Based on a Symmetrical Sandwich Capacitor Structure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1