Awareness and care practices for rare neurologic diseases among senior neurologists: A global survey

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of the Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-15 Epub Date: 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jns.2025.123395
Dae-Gyu Jang , Antonio Federico , Masha G. Savelieff , Wolfgang Grisold , Michelangelo Mancuso , Maria J. Molnar , Eva L. Feldman , Evan L. Reynolds , on behalf of the World Federation of Neurology Subspecialist Group on Rare Neurologic Diseases
{"title":"Awareness and care practices for rare neurologic diseases among senior neurologists: A global survey","authors":"Dae-Gyu Jang ,&nbsp;Antonio Federico ,&nbsp;Masha G. Savelieff ,&nbsp;Wolfgang Grisold ,&nbsp;Michelangelo Mancuso ,&nbsp;Maria J. Molnar ,&nbsp;Eva L. Feldman ,&nbsp;Evan L. Reynolds ,&nbsp;on behalf of the World Federation of Neurology Subspecialist Group on Rare Neurologic Diseases","doi":"10.1016/j.jns.2025.123395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Rare neurologic diseases (RNDs) are difficult to diagnose and treat due to their low prevalence and complex nature. This survey evaluated awareness and current care status of RNDs among esteemed neurologists affiliated with the World Federation of Neurology (WFN).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 34-question survey was distributed to renowned neurologists, including delegates from national neurology societies in the WFN Assembly, various WFN committees, and members of the Rare Neurologic Diseases Specialist group. Responses were stratified by geographical regions, including Africa, the Americas, Asia/Oceania, and Europe, and into four income groups based on the World Bank Indicator. Descriptive statistics summarized responses, stratified by geographical regions or income groups, and significant differences were assessed by Fisher's exact test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 190 invited neurologists, 64 responded (34 % response rate). Among respondents, 89 % agreed that RND patients should receive timely and effective care on par with more common neurological conditions. Additionally, 77 % of respondents overall thought most RNDs could be accurately diagnosed in their country. However, there were significant differences in the perceived ability of respondents' country of practice to diagnose RNDs by region, specifically in Africa (25 %), and by income of country of practice, specifically in the lower-income group (17 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This global survey highlights varying RND diagnosis and care by country socioeconomic status, suggesting potential disparities in resources and preparedness. To improve outcomes and quality-of-life for RND patients, efforts should focus on improving diagnostic capabilities, fostering collaboration among neurology centers, and promoting education on the unique challenges and treatment options of RNDs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17417,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","volume":"470 ","pages":"Article 123395"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022510X25000127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Rare neurologic diseases (RNDs) are difficult to diagnose and treat due to their low prevalence and complex nature. This survey evaluated awareness and current care status of RNDs among esteemed neurologists affiliated with the World Federation of Neurology (WFN).

Methods

A 34-question survey was distributed to renowned neurologists, including delegates from national neurology societies in the WFN Assembly, various WFN committees, and members of the Rare Neurologic Diseases Specialist group. Responses were stratified by geographical regions, including Africa, the Americas, Asia/Oceania, and Europe, and into four income groups based on the World Bank Indicator. Descriptive statistics summarized responses, stratified by geographical regions or income groups, and significant differences were assessed by Fisher's exact test.

Results

Of 190 invited neurologists, 64 responded (34 % response rate). Among respondents, 89 % agreed that RND patients should receive timely and effective care on par with more common neurological conditions. Additionally, 77 % of respondents overall thought most RNDs could be accurately diagnosed in their country. However, there were significant differences in the perceived ability of respondents' country of practice to diagnose RNDs by region, specifically in Africa (25 %), and by income of country of practice, specifically in the lower-income group (17 %).

Conclusions

This global survey highlights varying RND diagnosis and care by country socioeconomic status, suggesting potential disparities in resources and preparedness. To improve outcomes and quality-of-life for RND patients, efforts should focus on improving diagnostic capabilities, fostering collaboration among neurology centers, and promoting education on the unique challenges and treatment options of RNDs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高级神经科医生对罕见神经疾病的认识和护理实践:一项全球调查。
目的:罕见神经系统疾病(RNDs)因其发病率低、性质复杂而难以诊断和治疗。本调查评估了世界神经病学联合会(WFN)尊敬的神经科医生对rnd的认识和当前护理状况。方法:一份包含34个问题的调查问卷被分发给著名的神经科医生,其中包括来自世界神经联盟大会的国家神经学会代表、世界神经联盟各委员会的代表以及罕见神经疾病专家组的成员。答复按地理区域(包括非洲、美洲、亚洲/大洋洲和欧洲)分层,并根据世界银行指标分为四个收入组。描述性统计总结了反应,按地理区域或收入群体分层,并通过Fisher精确检验评估显著差异。结果:190名特邀神经科医师中,应答64人,应答率34%。在受访者中,89%的人认为RND患者应该得到与更常见的神经系统疾病同等的及时和有效的治疗。此外,77%的答复者总体上认为大多数rnd可以在他们的国家得到准确诊断。然而,按区域,特别是在非洲(25%)和按收入,特别是在低收入群体(17%),受访者的实践国诊断rnd的感知能力存在显著差异。结论:这项全球调查强调,RND的诊断和治疗因国家社会经济状况而异,表明在资源和准备方面存在潜在差异。为了改善RND患者的预后和生活质量,应努力提高诊断能力,促进神经病学中心之间的合作,并促进RND独特挑战和治疗选择的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Journal of the Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
313
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Neurological Sciences provides a medium for the prompt publication of original articles in neurology and neuroscience from around the world. JNS places special emphasis on articles that: 1) provide guidance to clinicians around the world (Best Practices, Global Neurology); 2) report cutting-edge science related to neurology (Basic and Translational Sciences); 3) educate readers about relevant and practical clinical outcomes in neurology (Outcomes Research); and 4) summarize or editorialize the current state of the literature (Reviews, Commentaries, and Editorials). JNS accepts most types of manuscripts for consideration including original research papers, short communications, reviews, book reviews, letters to the Editor, opinions and editorials. Topics considered will be from neurology-related fields that are of interest to practicing physicians around the world. Examples include neuromuscular diseases, demyelination, atrophies, dementia, neoplasms, infections, epilepsies, disturbances of consciousness, stroke and cerebral circulation, growth and development, plasticity and intermediary metabolism.
期刊最新文献
Evidence for compromised function of the glymphatic system in pediatric acquired demyelinating disorders Response to “Comment on ‘efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis’” AQP4 levels in CSF correlate with clinical severity in iNPH patients: A pilot study A cross-sectional exploration of the relationship between Parkinson's disease and peripheral blood immune cells in an ethnically diverse East London population The temporal mismatch between MRI-based prognostic classification and the therapeutic window
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1