Understanding Patterns of the Gut Microbiome May Contribute to the Early Detection and Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.

IF 4.2 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Microorganisms Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.3390/microorganisms13010134
Natalia G Bednarska, Asta Kristine Håberg
{"title":"Understanding Patterns of the Gut Microbiome May Contribute to the Early Detection and Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Natalia G Bednarska, Asta Kristine Håberg","doi":"10.3390/microorganisms13010134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rising burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a growing global public health problem, particularly prominent in developing countries. The early detection of T2DM and prediabetes is vital for reversing the outcome of disease, allowing early intervention. In the past decade, various microbiome-metabolome studies have attempted to address the question of whether there are any common microbial patterns that indicate either prediabetic or diabetic gut microbial signatures. Because current studies have a high methodological heterogeneity and risk of bias, we have selected studies that adhered to similar design and methodology. We performed a systematic review to assess if there were any common changes in microbiome belonging to diabetic, prediabetic and healthy individuals. The cross-sectional studies presented here collectively covered a population of 65,754 people, with 1800 in the 2TD group, 2770 in the prediabetic group and 61,184 in the control group. The overall microbial diversity scores were lower in the T2D and prediabetes cohorts in 86% of the analyzed studies. Re-programming of the microbiome is potentially one of the safest and long-lasting ways to eliminate diabetes in its early stages. The differences in the abundance of certain microbial species could serve as an early warning for a dysbiotic gut environment and could be easily modified before the onset of disease by changes in lifestyle, taking probiotics, introducing diet modifications or stimulating the vagal nerve. This review shows how metagenomic studies have and will continue to identify novel therapeutic targets (probiotics, prebiotics or targets for elimination from flora). This work clearly shows that gut microbiome intervention studies, if performed according to standard operating protocols using a predefined analytic framework (e.g., STORMS), could be combined with other similar studies, allowing broader conclusions from collating all global cohort studies efforts and eliminating the effect-size statistical insufficiency of a single study.</p>","PeriodicalId":18667,"journal":{"name":"Microorganisms","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11767308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microorganisms","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13010134","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rising burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a growing global public health problem, particularly prominent in developing countries. The early detection of T2DM and prediabetes is vital for reversing the outcome of disease, allowing early intervention. In the past decade, various microbiome-metabolome studies have attempted to address the question of whether there are any common microbial patterns that indicate either prediabetic or diabetic gut microbial signatures. Because current studies have a high methodological heterogeneity and risk of bias, we have selected studies that adhered to similar design and methodology. We performed a systematic review to assess if there were any common changes in microbiome belonging to diabetic, prediabetic and healthy individuals. The cross-sectional studies presented here collectively covered a population of 65,754 people, with 1800 in the 2TD group, 2770 in the prediabetic group and 61,184 in the control group. The overall microbial diversity scores were lower in the T2D and prediabetes cohorts in 86% of the analyzed studies. Re-programming of the microbiome is potentially one of the safest and long-lasting ways to eliminate diabetes in its early stages. The differences in the abundance of certain microbial species could serve as an early warning for a dysbiotic gut environment and could be easily modified before the onset of disease by changes in lifestyle, taking probiotics, introducing diet modifications or stimulating the vagal nerve. This review shows how metagenomic studies have and will continue to identify novel therapeutic targets (probiotics, prebiotics or targets for elimination from flora). This work clearly shows that gut microbiome intervention studies, if performed according to standard operating protocols using a predefined analytic framework (e.g., STORMS), could be combined with other similar studies, allowing broader conclusions from collating all global cohort studies efforts and eliminating the effect-size statistical insufficiency of a single study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解肠道微生物群的模式可能有助于2型糖尿病的早期发现和预防:一项系统综述
2型糖尿病(T2DM)日益加重的负担是一个日益严重的全球公共卫生问题,在发展中国家尤为突出。早期发现T2DM和前驱糖尿病对于扭转疾病的结果至关重要,可以进行早期干预。在过去的十年中,各种微生物组代谢组研究试图解决是否存在任何共同的微生物模式表明糖尿病前期或糖尿病肠道微生物特征的问题。由于目前的研究具有较高的方法学异质性和偏倚风险,我们选择了遵循类似设计和方法学的研究。我们进行了一项系统综述,以评估糖尿病、糖尿病前期和健康个体的微生物组是否有任何共同的变化。本文提出的横断面研究共涵盖了65,754人,其中2TD组为1800人,糖尿病前期组为2770人,对照组为61,184人。在86%的分析研究中,t2dm和前驱糖尿病患者的总体微生物多样性得分较低。重新编程微生物群可能是在早期阶段消除糖尿病的最安全、最持久的方法之一。某些微生物种类丰度的差异可以作为肠道环境失调的早期预警,并且可以通过改变生活方式,服用益生菌,引入饮食调整或刺激迷走神经,在疾病发作之前很容易改变。这篇综述展示了宏基因组研究如何已经并将继续确定新的治疗靶点(益生菌、益生元或从菌群中消除的靶点)。这项工作清楚地表明,如果按照标准操作方案使用预定义的分析框架(例如,STORMS)进行肠道微生物组干预研究,则可以与其他类似研究相结合,从而通过整理所有全球队列研究工作获得更广泛的结论,并消除单个研究的效应大小统计不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Microorganisms
Microorganisms Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
2168
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: Microorganisms (ISSN 2076-2607) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and prions. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation or experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary electronic material.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Intestinal Microbiota Differences and Functional Prediction Between Sichuan-Tibetan Black Pigs and Landrace Pigs. Diversity Analysis of Fecal Microbiota in Goats Driven by White Blood Cell Count. Genetic Diversity and Emerging Trends of Mycoplasma synoviae in China: Insights from a 2024 Nationwide MLST Study. Colletotrichum Species Associated with Alfalfa Anthracnose: An Overview and Historical Perspective. First Isolation of Klebsiella pneumoniae from Septicaemic Piglets in Poland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1