Integrating Remote Sensing and Soil Features for Enhanced Machine Learning-Based Corn Yield Prediction in the Southern US.

IF 3.5 3区 综合性期刊 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Sensors Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI:10.3390/s25020543
Sayantan Sarkar, Javier M Osorio Leyton, Efrain Noa-Yarasca, Kabindra Adhikari, Chad B Hajda, Douglas R Smith
{"title":"Integrating Remote Sensing and Soil Features for Enhanced Machine Learning-Based Corn Yield Prediction in the Southern US.","authors":"Sayantan Sarkar, Javier M Osorio Leyton, Efrain Noa-Yarasca, Kabindra Adhikari, Chad B Hajda, Douglas R Smith","doi":"10.3390/s25020543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Efficient and reliable corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) yield prediction is important for varietal selection by plant breeders and management decision-making by growers. Unlike prior studies that focus mainly on county-level or controlled laboratory-scale areas, this study targets a production-scale area, better representing real-world agricultural conditions and offering more practical relevance for farmers. Therefore, the objective of our study was to determine the best combination of vegetation indices and abiotic factors for predicting corn yield in a rain-fed, production-scale area, identify the most suitable corn growth stage for yield estimation using machine learning, and identify the most effective machine learning model for corn yield estimation. Our study used high-resolution (6 cm) aerial multispectral imagery. Sixty-two different predictors, including soil properties (sand, silt, and clay percentages), slope, spectral bands (red, green, blue, red-edge, NIR), vegetation indices (GNDRE, NDRE, TGI), color-space indices, and wavelengths were derived from the multispectral data collected at the seven (V4, V5, V6, V7, V9, V12, and V14/VT) growth stages of corn. Four regression and machine learning algorithms were evaluated for yield prediction: linear regression, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and gradient boosting regressor. A total of 6865 yield values were used for model training and 1716 for validation. Results show that, using random forest method, the V14/VT stage had the best yield predictions (RMSE of 0.52 Mg/ha for a mean yield of 10.19 Mg/ha), and yield estimation at V6 stage was still feasible. We concluded that integrating abiotic factors, such as slope and soil properties, significantly improved model accuracy. Among vegetation indices, TGI, HUE, and GNDRE performed better. Results from this study can help farmers or crop consultants plan ahead for future logistics through enhanced early-season yield predictions and support farm profitability and sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":21698,"journal":{"name":"Sensors","volume":"25 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11769266/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sensors","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/s25020543","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Efficient and reliable corn (Zea mays L.) yield prediction is important for varietal selection by plant breeders and management decision-making by growers. Unlike prior studies that focus mainly on county-level or controlled laboratory-scale areas, this study targets a production-scale area, better representing real-world agricultural conditions and offering more practical relevance for farmers. Therefore, the objective of our study was to determine the best combination of vegetation indices and abiotic factors for predicting corn yield in a rain-fed, production-scale area, identify the most suitable corn growth stage for yield estimation using machine learning, and identify the most effective machine learning model for corn yield estimation. Our study used high-resolution (6 cm) aerial multispectral imagery. Sixty-two different predictors, including soil properties (sand, silt, and clay percentages), slope, spectral bands (red, green, blue, red-edge, NIR), vegetation indices (GNDRE, NDRE, TGI), color-space indices, and wavelengths were derived from the multispectral data collected at the seven (V4, V5, V6, V7, V9, V12, and V14/VT) growth stages of corn. Four regression and machine learning algorithms were evaluated for yield prediction: linear regression, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and gradient boosting regressor. A total of 6865 yield values were used for model training and 1716 for validation. Results show that, using random forest method, the V14/VT stage had the best yield predictions (RMSE of 0.52 Mg/ha for a mean yield of 10.19 Mg/ha), and yield estimation at V6 stage was still feasible. We concluded that integrating abiotic factors, such as slope and soil properties, significantly improved model accuracy. Among vegetation indices, TGI, HUE, and GNDRE performed better. Results from this study can help farmers or crop consultants plan ahead for future logistics through enhanced early-season yield predictions and support farm profitability and sustainability.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整合遥感和土壤特征增强基于机器学习的美国南部玉米产量预测。
高效、可靠的玉米产量预测对植物育种家的品种选择和种植者的经营决策具有重要意义。与以往的研究主要集中在县级或受控实验室规模的地区不同,本研究的目标是一个生产规模的地区,更好地代表了现实世界的农业条件,并为农民提供了更多的实际相关性。因此,我们的研究目的是确定在雨养生产规模地区预测玉米产量的最佳植被指数和非生物因子组合,确定最适合使用机器学习进行产量估计的玉米生长阶段,并确定最有效的玉米产量估计机器学习模型。我们的研究使用了高分辨率(6厘米)的航空多光谱图像。利用玉米V4、V5、V6、V7、V9、V12和V14/VT 7个生育期的多光谱数据,得到了土壤性质(沙土、粉土和粘土百分比)、坡度、光谱带(红、绿、蓝、红边、近红外光谱)、植被指数(GNDRE、NDRE、TGI)、色彩空间指数和波长等62个不同的预测因子。评估了四种回归和机器学习算法用于产量预测:线性回归、随机森林、极端梯度增强和梯度增强回归。共有6865个屈服值用于模型训练,1716个用于验证。结果表明,采用随机森林方法,V14/VT期产量预测效果最佳(RMSE为0.52 Mg/ha,平均产量为10.19 Mg/ha), V6期产量预测仍然可行。我们的结论是,整合非生物因素,如坡度和土壤性质,显著提高了模型的准确性。植被指数中,TGI、HUE和GNDRE表现较好。这项研究的结果可以帮助农民或作物顾问通过加强季前产量预测来提前规划未来的物流,并支持农场的盈利能力和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sensors
Sensors 工程技术-电化学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.80%
发文量
8430
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Sensors (ISSN 1424-8220) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of sensors and biosensors. It publishes reviews (including comprehensive reviews on the complete sensors products), regular research papers and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
期刊最新文献
A Joint Framework of IMM-LSTM-C Tracking and IBPDO-Based Node Selection for Energy-Efficient Cooperative Tracking in Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks. A Deep Learning-Based Method for Stress Measurement Using Longitudinal Critically Refracted Waves. LEACH Protocol Evolution in WSN: A Review of Energy Consumption Optimization and Security Reinforcement. Efficient Mesh Reconstruction and Texturing of Oracle Bones. A Cheonjiin Layout Mental Speller: Developing a Simple and Cost-Effective EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interface System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1