The association between initial defibrillation dose and outcomes following adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: A retrospective, multi-agency study

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110507
Tanner Smida , Sheldon Cheskes , Remle Crowe , Bradley S. Price , James Scheidler , Michael Shukis , P.S. Martin , James Bardes
{"title":"The association between initial defibrillation dose and outcomes following adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: A retrospective, multi-agency study","authors":"Tanner Smida ,&nbsp;Sheldon Cheskes ,&nbsp;Remle Crowe ,&nbsp;Bradley S. Price ,&nbsp;James Scheidler ,&nbsp;Michael Shukis ,&nbsp;P.S. Martin ,&nbsp;James Bardes","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Effective defibrillation is essential to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival. International guidelines recommend initial defibrillation energies between 120 and 360 Joules, which has led to widespread practice variation. Leveraging this natural experiment, we aimed to explore the association between initial defibrillation dose and outcome following OHCA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The ESO Data Collaborative (2018–2022) was used for this nationwide, retrospective study of adult (18–80 years of age) non-traumatic OHCA patients who presented with an initially shockable ECG rhythm. We excluded patients if they had ROSC prior to initial defibrillation, a resuscitation-limiting advanced directive, or were residents in a healthcare institution. The primary exposure was initial defibrillation dose, defined as Joules per kilogram of body weight, and the primary outcome was return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). We included survival to discharge as a secondary outcome. We used multivariable logistic regression modeling to assess the relationship between defibrillation dose and outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We analyzed data from 21,121 patients. Of the 12,160 patients linked to a defibrillator manufacturer, 7,240 (59.5%) were treated using a biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveform and 4,920 (40.5%) were treated using a rectilinear biphasic (RLB) waveform. Defibrillation dose (per 1 J/kg increase) was not associated with ROSC (BTE aOR: 0.97 [0.92, 1.01], <em>n</em> = 7,240; RLB aOR: 1.00 [0.92, 1.09], <em>n</em> = 4,920; all aOR: 1.01 [0.98, 1.04], 21,121) or survival (BTE aOR: 0.98 [0.87, 1.10], <em>n</em> = 1,245; RLB aOR: 0.89 [0.70, 1.12], <em>n</em> = 775; all aOR: 1.00 [0.92, 1.08], <em>n</em> = 2,981).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Initial defibrillation dose was not associated with outcome in this nationwide cohort.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 110507"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030095722500019X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Effective defibrillation is essential to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival. International guidelines recommend initial defibrillation energies between 120 and 360 Joules, which has led to widespread practice variation. Leveraging this natural experiment, we aimed to explore the association between initial defibrillation dose and outcome following OHCA.

Methods

The ESO Data Collaborative (2018–2022) was used for this nationwide, retrospective study of adult (18–80 years of age) non-traumatic OHCA patients who presented with an initially shockable ECG rhythm. We excluded patients if they had ROSC prior to initial defibrillation, a resuscitation-limiting advanced directive, or were residents in a healthcare institution. The primary exposure was initial defibrillation dose, defined as Joules per kilogram of body weight, and the primary outcome was return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). We included survival to discharge as a secondary outcome. We used multivariable logistic regression modeling to assess the relationship between defibrillation dose and outcome.

Results

We analyzed data from 21,121 patients. Of the 12,160 patients linked to a defibrillator manufacturer, 7,240 (59.5%) were treated using a biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveform and 4,920 (40.5%) were treated using a rectilinear biphasic (RLB) waveform. Defibrillation dose (per 1 J/kg increase) was not associated with ROSC (BTE aOR: 0.97 [0.92, 1.01], n = 7,240; RLB aOR: 1.00 [0.92, 1.09], n = 4,920; all aOR: 1.01 [0.98, 1.04], 21,121) or survival (BTE aOR: 0.98 [0.87, 1.10], n = 1,245; RLB aOR: 0.89 [0.70, 1.12], n = 775; all aOR: 1.00 [0.92, 1.08], n = 2,981).

Conclusions

Initial defibrillation dose was not associated with outcome in this nationwide cohort.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人院外心脏骤停复苏后初始除颤剂量与预后的关系:一项回顾性、多机构研究
有效的除颤对院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的生存至关重要。国际指南建议初始除颤能量在120到360焦耳之间,这导致了广泛的实践差异。利用这一自然实验,我们旨在探讨OHCA后初始除颤剂量与预后之间的关系。方法:ESO数据协作(2018-2022)用于这项全国性的回顾性研究,研究对象为成人(18-80岁)非创伤性OHCA患者,这些患者最初表现为ECG节律震荡。我们排除了在初始除颤前有ROSC的患者,限制复苏的高级指令,或者是医疗机构的居民。主要暴露是初始除颤剂量,定义为每公斤体重焦耳,主要结局是自发循环恢复(ROSC)。我们将生存至出院作为次要结局。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型来评估除颤剂量与预后之间的关系。结果:我们分析了21,121例患者的数据。在与除颤器制造商相关的12,160例患者中,7240例(59.5%)采用双相截断指数(BTE)波形治疗,4920例(40.5%)采用直线双相(RLB)波形治疗。除颤剂量(每增加1 J/kg)与ROSC无关(BTE aOR: 0.97 [0.92, 1.01], n= 7240;RLB aOR: 1.00 [0.92, 1.09], n=4,920;所有aOR: 1.01[0.98, 1.04], 21,121)或生存率(BTE aOR: 0.98 [0.87, 1.10], n=1,245;RLB aOR: 0.89 [0.70, 1.12], n=775;所有aOR: 1.00 [0.92, 1.08], n=2,981)。结论:在这个全国性队列中,初始除颤剂量与结果无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
期刊最新文献
That heaven’s vault should crack: predicting brain death after hanging The association between emergency medical service personnel’s out-of-hospital cardiac arrest case volume and patient outcomes: a cohort study Deep learning-based ROSC prediction and ECG phenotyping in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Maternal Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) in the United States Double defibrillation… synchronous or sequential? A safety issue for defibrillators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1