Should We Adopt Increased Dilutions for Indirect Immunofluorescence in Pediatric Anti-Centromere Antibody Testing? Insights from a Three-Year Retrospective Study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Children-Basel Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI:10.3390/children12010036
Mehmet Soylu, Raziye Burcu Taşkın, Gülçin Aytaç, Güzide Aksu, Seyfi Durmaz, Miray Karakoyun, Şaziye Rüçhan Sertöz
{"title":"Should We Adopt Increased Dilutions for Indirect Immunofluorescence in Pediatric Anti-Centromere Antibody Testing? Insights from a Three-Year Retrospective Study.","authors":"Mehmet Soylu, Raziye Burcu Taşkın, Gülçin Aytaç, Güzide Aksu, Seyfi Durmaz, Miray Karakoyun, Şaziye Rüçhan Sertöz","doi":"10.3390/children12010036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) pose diagnostic challenges, particularly in pediatric populations, due to their diverse presentations and overlapping symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic concordance between indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) at different dilution levels (1/80 and 1/640) and immunoblot findings for anti-centromere antibody (ACA) positivity. Additionally, the clinical significance of ACA positivity and its association with SARDs in pediatric patients was assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, cross-sectional study included 58 pediatric patients evaluated for anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) testing at Ege University Hospital from 2019 to 2021. IIF was performed using HEp-20-10 cells and immunoblot testing was conducted to assess CENP-B reactivity. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, correspondence analysis, and regression modeling to explore the relationship between IIF titers, immunoblot findings, and SARD diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the patients, 62.1% were diagnosed with SARD. Higher IIF titers (≥1/640) were strongly associated with CENP-B 3+ immunoblot positivity, while lower titers (1/80 and 1/320) correlated with CENP-B 1+. Patients with IIF positivity at 1/80 were 15.89 times more likely to have SARD (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Correspondence analysis revealed significant associations between IIF dilution levels and immunoblot reactivity (χ<sup>2</sup> = 37.574, <i>p</i> < 0.000). Gender and age were not significant predictors of SARD positivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the diagnostic value of higher IIF dilution levels (≥1/640) in improving ACA detection and SARD diagnosis in pediatric patients. Incorporating complementary diagnostic tools, such as immunoblot testing, can enhance diagnostic accuracy. These findings support adopting higher IIF cutoff levels in clinical practice for pediatric populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48588,"journal":{"name":"Children-Basel","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11763642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12010036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) pose diagnostic challenges, particularly in pediatric populations, due to their diverse presentations and overlapping symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic concordance between indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) at different dilution levels (1/80 and 1/640) and immunoblot findings for anti-centromere antibody (ACA) positivity. Additionally, the clinical significance of ACA positivity and its association with SARDs in pediatric patients was assessed.

Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study included 58 pediatric patients evaluated for anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) testing at Ege University Hospital from 2019 to 2021. IIF was performed using HEp-20-10 cells and immunoblot testing was conducted to assess CENP-B reactivity. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, correspondence analysis, and regression modeling to explore the relationship between IIF titers, immunoblot findings, and SARD diagnoses.

Results: Among the patients, 62.1% were diagnosed with SARD. Higher IIF titers (≥1/640) were strongly associated with CENP-B 3+ immunoblot positivity, while lower titers (1/80 and 1/320) correlated with CENP-B 1+. Patients with IIF positivity at 1/80 were 15.89 times more likely to have SARD (p < 0.001). Correspondence analysis revealed significant associations between IIF dilution levels and immunoblot reactivity (χ2 = 37.574, p < 0.000). Gender and age were not significant predictors of SARD positivity.

Conclusions: This study highlights the diagnostic value of higher IIF dilution levels (≥1/640) in improving ACA detection and SARD diagnosis in pediatric patients. Incorporating complementary diagnostic tools, such as immunoblot testing, can enhance diagnostic accuracy. These findings support adopting higher IIF cutoff levels in clinical practice for pediatric populations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在儿科抗心磷脂抗体检测中,我们是否应该采用加大稀释度的间接免疫荧光法?三年回顾性研究的启示。
背景/目的:系统性自身免疫性风湿病(SARDs)由于其多样的表现和重叠的症状,给诊断带来挑战,特别是在儿科人群中。本研究旨在评价不同稀释水平(1/80和1/640)的间接免疫荧光(IIF)与免疫印迹结果对抗着丝粒抗体(ACA)阳性的诊断一致性。此外,评估儿科患者ACA阳性的临床意义及其与SARDs的关系。方法:这项回顾性横断面研究纳入了2019年至2021年在埃格大学医院接受抗核抗体(ANA)检测的58例儿科患者。使用HEp-20-10细胞进行IIF,并进行免疫印迹检测以评估CENP-B的反应性。统计分析包括卡方检验、对应分析和回归模型,以探讨IIF滴度、免疫印迹结果和SARD诊断之间的关系。结果:62.1%的患者被诊断为SARD。较高的IIF滴度(≥1/640)与CENP-B 3+免疫印迹阳性密切相关,而较低的IIF滴度(1/80和1/320)与CENP-B 1+阳性相关。IIF阳性为1/80的患者发生SARD的可能性为15.89倍(p < 0.001)。对应分析显示IIF稀释水平与免疫印迹反应性有显著相关性(χ2 = 37.574, p < 0.000)。性别和年龄不是SARD阳性的显著预测因子。结论:本研究强调了高IIF稀释水平(≥1/640)在提高儿科患者ACA检测和SARD诊断中的诊断价值。结合补充诊断工具,如免疫印迹检测,可以提高诊断的准确性。这些发现支持在儿科人群的临床实践中采用更高的IIF临界值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Children-Basel
Children-Basel PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1735
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Children is an international, open access journal dedicated to a streamlined, yet scientifically rigorous, dissemination of peer-reviewed science related to childhood health and disease in developed and developing countries. The publication focuses on sharing clinical, epidemiological and translational science relevant to children’s health. Moreover, the primary goals of the publication are to highlight under‑represented pediatric disciplines, to emphasize interdisciplinary research and to disseminate advances in knowledge in global child health. In addition to original research, the journal publishes expert editorials and commentaries, clinical case reports, and insightful communications reflecting the latest developments in pediatric medicine. By publishing meritorious articles as soon as the editorial review process is completed, rather than at predefined intervals, Children also permits rapid open access sharing of new information, allowing us to reach the broadest audience in the most expedient fashion.
期刊最新文献
Mechanisms of Change in Mindfulness-Based Family Intervention (MYmind) Versus Methylphenidate for Childhood ADHD: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Virtual Reality Versus Monitor-Based Distraction in Children with Mild Intellectual Disability: A Preliminary Comparative Observational Study. Adult Rome IV Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction in a Pediatric Population. Inequalities in Childhood Healthcare Access Among Racial and Ethnic Groups of Sub-Saharan Africa: A Narrative Review. The Link Between Emotional Regulation and Impulsivity in Childhood Anxiety Disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1