Is counting a bad idea? Complex relations among children’s fraction knowledge, eye movements, and performance in visual fraction comparisons

IF 2 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106181
Sabrina Schwarzmeier, Andreas Obersteiner
{"title":"Is counting a bad idea? Complex relations among children’s fraction knowledge, eye movements, and performance in visual fraction comparisons","authors":"Sabrina Schwarzmeier,&nbsp;Andreas Obersteiner","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding fraction magnitudes is crucial for mathematical development but is challenging for many children. Visualizations, such as tape diagrams, are thought to leverage children’s early proportional reasoning skills. However, depending on children’s prior knowledge, these visualizations may encourage various strategies. Children with lower fraction knowledge might rely on counting, leading to natural number bias and low performance, whereas those with higher knowledge might rely on more efficient strategies based on magnitude. This study explores the relationship between students’ general fraction knowledge and their ability to visually compare fraction magnitudes represented with tape diagrams. A total of 67 children completed a fraction knowledge test and a set of comparison tasks with discretized and continuous tape diagrams while their eye movements, accuracy, and response times were recorded. Cluster analysis identified three groups. The first group, high-achieving and applying magnitude-based strategies, showed high accuracy and short response times, indicating efficiency. A second high-achieving group frequently used counting strategies, which was unexpected. This group achieved the highest accuracy but the longest response times, indicating less efficiency. The third group, low-achieving and rarely using counting strategies, had the lowest accuracy and short response times. These students tended to compare absolute sizes rather than relative sizes (i.e., showing a size bias). None of the groups exhibited a natural number bias. The study suggests that counting, although inefficient, does not necessarily lead to bias or low performance. Instead, biased reasoning with fraction visualizations can originate from reliance on absolute sizes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 106181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524003217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding fraction magnitudes is crucial for mathematical development but is challenging for many children. Visualizations, such as tape diagrams, are thought to leverage children’s early proportional reasoning skills. However, depending on children’s prior knowledge, these visualizations may encourage various strategies. Children with lower fraction knowledge might rely on counting, leading to natural number bias and low performance, whereas those with higher knowledge might rely on more efficient strategies based on magnitude. This study explores the relationship between students’ general fraction knowledge and their ability to visually compare fraction magnitudes represented with tape diagrams. A total of 67 children completed a fraction knowledge test and a set of comparison tasks with discretized and continuous tape diagrams while their eye movements, accuracy, and response times were recorded. Cluster analysis identified three groups. The first group, high-achieving and applying magnitude-based strategies, showed high accuracy and short response times, indicating efficiency. A second high-achieving group frequently used counting strategies, which was unexpected. This group achieved the highest accuracy but the longest response times, indicating less efficiency. The third group, low-achieving and rarely using counting strategies, had the lowest accuracy and short response times. These students tended to compare absolute sizes rather than relative sizes (i.e., showing a size bias). None of the groups exhibited a natural number bias. The study suggests that counting, although inefficient, does not necessarily lead to bias or low performance. Instead, biased reasoning with fraction visualizations can originate from reliance on absolute sizes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数数是个坏主意吗?儿童分数知识、眼球运动与视觉分数比较表现之间的复杂关系。
理解分数的大小对数学发展至关重要,但对许多孩子来说是具有挑战性的。可视化,如磁带图,被认为是利用儿童早期的比例推理技能。然而,根据儿童先前的知识,这些可视化可能会鼓励各种策略。分数知识较低的儿童可能依赖于计数,导致自然数偏差和低表现,而知识较高的儿童可能依赖于基于数量级的更有效的策略。本研究探讨学生的一般分数知识与他们视觉比较分数大小的能力之间的关系。共有67名儿童完成了分数知识测试和一组使用离散和连续磁带图的比较任务,同时记录了他们的眼球运动、准确性和反应时间。聚类分析确定了三组。第一组,高成就和应用基于震级的策略,显示出高准确性和短响应时间,表明效率。另一个高成就组经常使用计数策略,这是出乎意料的。这一组的准确率最高,但反应时间最长,表明效率较低。第三组,成绩低,很少使用计数策略,准确率最低,反应时间短。这些学生倾向于比较绝对尺寸而不是相对尺寸(也就是说,表现出尺寸偏见)。没有一个组表现出自然数偏差。研究表明,计数虽然效率低下,但并不一定会导致偏见或低绩效。相反,带有分数可视化的偏见推理可能源于对绝对大小的依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
期刊最新文献
Confirmation bias in young children’s information seeking and evaluation of novel foods Bidirectional associations between self-regulation, social-emotional skills and mathematics in preschoolers: the interplay with teacher-child relationships The development of essentialist beliefs about social status categories in China Do picture books affect counting directionality in preliterate children? Developmental course and potential mechanisms Written or drawn episodic future thinking cues improves delay discounting in children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1