Patient flow problems affecting in-patient spinal cord injury rehabilitation in the Netherlands

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spinal cord Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1038/s41393-024-01058-6
Linda M. M. van der Schriek, Marcel W. M. Post, Catja A. Dijkstra, Peter W. New, Janneke M. Stolwijk-Swüste
{"title":"Patient flow problems affecting in-patient spinal cord injury rehabilitation in the Netherlands","authors":"Linda M. M. van der Schriek, Marcel W. M. Post, Catja A. Dijkstra, Peter W. New, Janneke M. Stolwijk-Swüste","doi":"10.1038/s41393-024-01058-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prospective cohort study. To describe barriers to admission to and discharge from an inpatient rehabilitation unit for patients with newly acquired spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) and to identify modifiable factors whereby patient flow can be optimized. Netherlands. In-patients with newly acquired SCI/D referred to a rehabilitation centre in the Netherlands between December 2018 and December 2019 were included. Demographic, clinical characteristics and information about waiting days and causes of delay were recorded. Descriptive analysis was used. In total, 105 patients were included; 33 patients (31%) were female, mean age was 59 years, 60% had a non-traumatic SCI/D, 42% of the SCI/D were tetraplegia and 62% were AIS D at referral. No significant differences in demographic or clinical characteristics were found between patients with and without a barrier to admission. Most common admission barriers were bed availability and capacity of nursing and other health staff. The most frequent discharge barriers were delay in care approval, lack of availability of nursing home places and waiting for home modifications. Most frequent admission barriers were availability of beds and staffing capacity; most discharge barriers were problems with home modifications, waiting for care approval or a nursing home place. Recommendations for reducing these barriers are recognizing a potential problem at an early stage, timely communication with patient and/or family about options for discharge, while simultaneously initiating a home modification plan and exploring temporary accommodation options.","PeriodicalId":21976,"journal":{"name":"Spinal cord","volume":"63 4","pages":"201-207"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spinal cord","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41393-024-01058-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prospective cohort study. To describe barriers to admission to and discharge from an inpatient rehabilitation unit for patients with newly acquired spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) and to identify modifiable factors whereby patient flow can be optimized. Netherlands. In-patients with newly acquired SCI/D referred to a rehabilitation centre in the Netherlands between December 2018 and December 2019 were included. Demographic, clinical characteristics and information about waiting days and causes of delay were recorded. Descriptive analysis was used. In total, 105 patients were included; 33 patients (31%) were female, mean age was 59 years, 60% had a non-traumatic SCI/D, 42% of the SCI/D were tetraplegia and 62% were AIS D at referral. No significant differences in demographic or clinical characteristics were found between patients with and without a barrier to admission. Most common admission barriers were bed availability and capacity of nursing and other health staff. The most frequent discharge barriers were delay in care approval, lack of availability of nursing home places and waiting for home modifications. Most frequent admission barriers were availability of beds and staffing capacity; most discharge barriers were problems with home modifications, waiting for care approval or a nursing home place. Recommendations for reducing these barriers are recognizing a potential problem at an early stage, timely communication with patient and/or family about options for discharge, while simultaneously initiating a home modification plan and exploring temporary accommodation options.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响荷兰住院脊髓损伤康复的病人流动问题。
研究设计:前瞻性队列研究。目的:描述新获得性脊髓损伤或疾病(SCI/D)患者入院和出院的障碍,并确定可调整的因素,从而优化患者流量。设置:荷兰。方法:纳入2018年12月至2019年12月期间在荷兰一家康复中心转诊的新获得性SCI/D住院患者。记录了人口统计学、临床特征以及等待时间和延误原因的信息。采用描述性分析。结果:共纳入105例患者;33例患者(31%)为女性,平均年龄59岁,60%为非创伤性SCI/D, 42%的SCI/D为四肢瘫痪,62%为AIS D。在有和没有住院障碍的患者之间没有发现人口统计学或临床特征的显著差异。最常见的入院障碍是床位供应以及护理和其他保健人员的能力。最常见的出院障碍是延迟护理批准,缺乏养老院的可用性和等待家庭改造。结论:最常见的入院障碍是床位供应和人员配备能力;大多数出院障碍是家庭装修问题,等待护理批准或养老院的地方。减少这些障碍的建议是在早期阶段认识到潜在的问题,及时与患者和/或家属沟通出院的选择,同时启动家庭改造计划并探索临时住宿选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spinal cord
Spinal cord 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
142
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Spinal Cord is a specialised, international journal that has been publishing spinal cord related manuscripts since 1963. It appears monthly, online and in print, and accepts contributions on spinal cord anatomy, physiology, management of injury and disease, and the quality of life and life circumstances of people with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord is multi-disciplinary and publishes contributions across the entire spectrum of research ranging from basic science to applied clinical research. It focuses on high quality original research, systematic reviews and narrative reviews. Spinal Cord''s sister journal Spinal Cord Series and Cases: Clinical Management in Spinal Cord Disorders publishes high quality case reports, small case series, pilot and retrospective studies perspectives, Pulse survey articles, Point-couterpoint articles, correspondences and book reviews. It specialises in material that addresses all aspects of life for persons with spinal cord injuries or disorders. For more information, please see the aims and scope of Spinal Cord Series and Cases.
期刊最新文献
Correction: "It has to work for us": A qualitative study exploring how lived experience engagement reframed development of a mental health module within a Spinal Cord Injury Self-Maintenance Tool. Comparison of health outcomes between traumatic spinal cord and cauda equina injuries. Impact of delayed diagnosis on surgical management and neurological outcomes in elderly patients with cervical spinal cord injury without radiographic evidence of trauma: a multicenter registry study. Wearable powered overground exoskeleton reduces dose-dependently the spasticity in individuals with spinal cord injury. Study design considerations in clinical trials testing transcutaneous stimulation for spinal cord injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1