Determinants for successful medullary fixation of the superior ramus

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2025.112170
Carol Lee , Justin Tilan , Brock D Foster , Eric White , John Garlich , Geoffrey S. Marecek
{"title":"Determinants for successful medullary fixation of the superior ramus","authors":"Carol Lee ,&nbsp;Justin Tilan ,&nbsp;Brock D Foster ,&nbsp;Eric White ,&nbsp;John Garlich ,&nbsp;Geoffrey S. Marecek","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The purpose of this study is to determine what demographic and anatomical variables affect successful placement of a superior medullary ramus screw, and how they affect the maximal diameter of that screw.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Design: Prognostic Level IV</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Level I Trauma Center Patients/Participants: Two hundred consecutive patients underwent computed tomography (CT) of the pelvis. We included those patients aged 18 and older without osseous injury or abnormalities precluding measurement.</div></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><div>3D reconstructions of the pelvis were created, and a virtual 3.5 mm cylindrical implant was placed from the pubic tubercle to the lateral cortex of the ilium. Success was defined as a bicortical virtual screw path from the ramus to the lateral ilium without cortical perforation. The cylinder was then expanded to model varying screw diameters. We then repeated this same process for unicortical retrograde screw insertion ending medial to the acetabular joint. Main Outcome Measures: Successful screw placement and maximum screw diameter.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A 3.5 mm screw was successfully placed in 187 patients (93.5 %). One male (1/107, 0.9 %) and 12 females (12/93, 12.9 %) could not accommodate a 3.5 mm screw. All cases of perforation occurred lateral to the obturator foramen. Increasing height was associated with success, and male gender was associated with the ability to accommodate screws with a diameter 6.5 mm and larger.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Most patients can accommodate a 3.5 mm screw from the pubic tubercle to the ilium. Height and gender should be noted when planning medullary ramus fixation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 3","pages":"Article 112170"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325000300","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study is to determine what demographic and anatomical variables affect successful placement of a superior medullary ramus screw, and how they affect the maximal diameter of that screw.

Methods

Design: Prognostic Level IV

Setting

Level I Trauma Center Patients/Participants: Two hundred consecutive patients underwent computed tomography (CT) of the pelvis. We included those patients aged 18 and older without osseous injury or abnormalities precluding measurement.

Intervention

3D reconstructions of the pelvis were created, and a virtual 3.5 mm cylindrical implant was placed from the pubic tubercle to the lateral cortex of the ilium. Success was defined as a bicortical virtual screw path from the ramus to the lateral ilium without cortical perforation. The cylinder was then expanded to model varying screw diameters. We then repeated this same process for unicortical retrograde screw insertion ending medial to the acetabular joint. Main Outcome Measures: Successful screw placement and maximum screw diameter.

Results

A 3.5 mm screw was successfully placed in 187 patients (93.5 %). One male (1/107, 0.9 %) and 12 females (12/93, 12.9 %) could not accommodate a 3.5 mm screw. All cases of perforation occurred lateral to the obturator foramen. Increasing height was associated with success, and male gender was associated with the ability to accommodate screws with a diameter 6.5 mm and larger.

Conclusions

Most patients can accommodate a 3.5 mm screw from the pubic tubercle to the ilium. Height and gender should be noted when planning medullary ramus fixation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上支髓质固定成功的决定因素。
目的:本研究的目的是确定影响髓上支螺钉成功放置的人口学和解剖学变量,以及它们如何影响螺钉的最大直径。方法:设计:预后IV级设置:I级创伤中心患者/参与者:连续200例患者接受骨盆计算机断层扫描(CT)。我们纳入了年龄在18岁及以上且无骨损伤或异常妨碍测量的患者。干预:创建骨盆三维重建,从耻骨结节到髂骨外侧皮质放置虚拟3.5 mm圆柱形植入物。成功被定义为双皮质虚拟螺钉路径从分支到外侧髂骨没有皮质穿孔。然后将圆柱体扩展以模拟不同的螺杆直径。然后,我们对止于髋臼关节内侧的单皮质逆行螺钉插入重复相同的过程。主要观察指标:螺钉置入成功和最大螺钉直径。结果:187例(93.5%)成功置入3.5 mm螺钉。1个公螺钉(1/107,0.9%)和12个母螺钉(12/93,12.9%)不能安装3.5 mm螺钉。所有穿孔均发生在闭孔外侧。身高增加与成功相关,男性与适应直径6.5毫米或更大的螺钉的能力相关。结论:大多数患者可以在耻骨结节和髂骨之间安装3.5 mm螺钉。在规划髓支固定时应注意身高和性别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
期刊最新文献
Matched comparative study of 3D printed microporous tantalum prosthesis versus autologous bone graft in the final stage of Masquelet induced membrane surgery Mechanical and clinical performance of acellular allogeneic dermis combined with autologous split-thickness skin grafts for ankle soft tissue defect repair Advanced trauma life support 2025: A brief review of updates Editorial Board The road injury chain of survival: A framework for improving trauma outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1