Determinants for successful medullary fixation of the superior ramus.

Carol Lee, Justin Tilan, Brock D Foster, Eric White, John Garlich, Geoffrey S Marecek
{"title":"Determinants for successful medullary fixation of the superior ramus.","authors":"Carol Lee, Justin Tilan, Brock D Foster, Eric White, John Garlich, Geoffrey S Marecek","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study is to determine what demographic and anatomical variables affect successful placement of a superior medullary ramus screw, and how they affect the maximal diameter of that screw.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Prognostic Level IV SETTING: Level I Trauma Center Patients/Participants: Two hundred consecutive patients underwent computed tomography (CT) of the pelvis. We included those patients aged 18 and older without osseous injury or abnormalities precluding measurement.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>3D reconstructions of the pelvis were created, and a virtual 3.5 mm cylindrical implant was placed from the pubic tubercle to the lateral cortex of the ilium. Success was defined as a bicortical virtual screw path from the ramus to the lateral ilium without cortical perforation. The cylinder was then expanded to model varying screw diameters. We then repeated this same process for unicortical retrograde screw insertion ending medial to the acetabular joint.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Successful screw placement and maximum screw diameter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 3.5 mm screw was successfully placed in 187 patients (93.5 %). One male (1/107, 0.9 %) and 12 females (12/93, 12.9 %) could not accommodate a 3.5 mm screw. All cases of perforation occurred lateral to the obturator foramen. Increasing height was associated with success, and male gender was associated with the ability to accommodate screws with a diameter 6.5 mm and larger.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients can accommodate a 3.5 mm screw from the pubic tubercle to the ilium. Height and gender should be noted when planning medullary ramus fixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":"56 3","pages":"112170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2025.112170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to determine what demographic and anatomical variables affect successful placement of a superior medullary ramus screw, and how they affect the maximal diameter of that screw.

Methods: Design: Prognostic Level IV SETTING: Level I Trauma Center Patients/Participants: Two hundred consecutive patients underwent computed tomography (CT) of the pelvis. We included those patients aged 18 and older without osseous injury or abnormalities precluding measurement.

Intervention: 3D reconstructions of the pelvis were created, and a virtual 3.5 mm cylindrical implant was placed from the pubic tubercle to the lateral cortex of the ilium. Success was defined as a bicortical virtual screw path from the ramus to the lateral ilium without cortical perforation. The cylinder was then expanded to model varying screw diameters. We then repeated this same process for unicortical retrograde screw insertion ending medial to the acetabular joint.

Main outcome measures: Successful screw placement and maximum screw diameter.

Results: A 3.5 mm screw was successfully placed in 187 patients (93.5 %). One male (1/107, 0.9 %) and 12 females (12/93, 12.9 %) could not accommodate a 3.5 mm screw. All cases of perforation occurred lateral to the obturator foramen. Increasing height was associated with success, and male gender was associated with the ability to accommodate screws with a diameter 6.5 mm and larger.

Conclusions: Most patients can accommodate a 3.5 mm screw from the pubic tubercle to the ilium. Height and gender should be noted when planning medullary ramus fixation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Demographic patterns in horseback riding head and neck injuries within the United States: A NEISS database study. Does maintaining external fixators during definitive fixation of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures influence fracture alignment and deep infection rates? High mortality among elderly with surgical treated femoral fracture in comparison to other surgical treated lower extremity fractures. A population-based register study from the Danish National Patient Registry. Outcomes of surgically treated posterior pelvic fractures in an Australian population: A multicenter study. The influence of pre-injury anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents on outcomes in trauma patients sustaining abdominal solid organ injuries: A scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1