Comparison of photodynamic therapy and LEEP in women of reproductive age with cervical squamous intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (CIN2): A prospective observational study in China

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2025.104496
Cheng Li, Xuanhui Wang, Qiulin Cui, Mian He, Ming Chen
{"title":"Comparison of photodynamic therapy and LEEP in women of reproductive age with cervical squamous intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (CIN2): A prospective observational study in China","authors":"Cheng Li,&nbsp;Xuanhui Wang,&nbsp;Qiulin Cui,&nbsp;Mian He,&nbsp;Ming Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.pdpdt.2025.104496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Non-invasive treatments, such as 5-Aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (5-ALA-PDT), has gained increasing attention among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) who have fertility requirements. To compare the effectiveness of 5-ALA-PDT and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) in patients with CIN2, we conducted this prospective cohort study in Chinese patients with CIN2.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>229 patients with CIN2 were enrolled. They were divided into the PDT Group (n=94) and LEEP Group (n=135) according to the patient's willingness. Patients were evaluated at the 3-, 6-, 12- and 18-month follow-up periods, using cytology, HPV testing, and colposcopy examination.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At the 3-month follow-up, the rates of disease regression to normal or CIN1 in the PDT group were 76.6% (72/94) and 13.8% (13/94), respectively, whereas in the LEEP group, they were 80.7% (109/135) and 11.1% (15/135), respectively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the transformation zone type 3 was the only risk factor for both the PDT (OR=3.68; 95% CI, 2.43-5.26; P=0.008) and LEEP groups (OR=2.34; 95% CI, 1.84-4.53; P=0.02). The treatment efficacy in the PDT group increased gradually and peaked at the 18-month follow-up point with disease disappearance and regression rates of 90.4% and 8.5%, respectively. The disease disappearance and regression rates in the LEEP group were highest at the first half year posttreatment, with disease disappearance and regression rates of 87.4% and 12.6%, respectively. The hrHPV-negative rates in the PDT group and LEEP group were the highest at the 18-month follow-up (78.7% and 74.8%). There was no significant difference in the disappearance or regression rates between the two groups at the follow-up points (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our study revealed that both 5-ALA PDT therapy and LEEP were highly effective at treating CIN2. 5-ALA-PDT, as a non-invasive treatment, could be an effective option for CIN2 patients with fertility preservation needs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20141,"journal":{"name":"Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy","volume":"52 ","pages":"Article 104496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572100025000262","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Non-invasive treatments, such as 5-Aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (5-ALA-PDT), has gained increasing attention among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) who have fertility requirements. To compare the effectiveness of 5-ALA-PDT and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) in patients with CIN2, we conducted this prospective cohort study in Chinese patients with CIN2.

Methods

229 patients with CIN2 were enrolled. They were divided into the PDT Group (n=94) and LEEP Group (n=135) according to the patient's willingness. Patients were evaluated at the 3-, 6-, 12- and 18-month follow-up periods, using cytology, HPV testing, and colposcopy examination.

Results

At the 3-month follow-up, the rates of disease regression to normal or CIN1 in the PDT group were 76.6% (72/94) and 13.8% (13/94), respectively, whereas in the LEEP group, they were 80.7% (109/135) and 11.1% (15/135), respectively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the transformation zone type 3 was the only risk factor for both the PDT (OR=3.68; 95% CI, 2.43-5.26; P=0.008) and LEEP groups (OR=2.34; 95% CI, 1.84-4.53; P=0.02). The treatment efficacy in the PDT group increased gradually and peaked at the 18-month follow-up point with disease disappearance and regression rates of 90.4% and 8.5%, respectively. The disease disappearance and regression rates in the LEEP group were highest at the first half year posttreatment, with disease disappearance and regression rates of 87.4% and 12.6%, respectively. The hrHPV-negative rates in the PDT group and LEEP group were the highest at the 18-month follow-up (78.7% and 74.8%). There was no significant difference in the disappearance or regression rates between the two groups at the follow-up points (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Our study revealed that both 5-ALA PDT therapy and LEEP were highly effective at treating CIN2. 5-ALA-PDT, as a non-invasive treatment, could be an effective option for CIN2 patients with fertility preservation needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较光动力疗法和LEEP治疗育龄妇女宫颈鳞状上皮内瘤变2 (CIN2):中国的一项前瞻性观察研究。
背景:非侵入性治疗,如5-氨基乙酰丙酸光动力疗法(5-ALA-PDT),在有生育需求的宫颈上皮内瘤变2级(CIN2)患者中越来越受到关注。为了比较5-ALA-PDT和环电切除手术(LEEP)在CIN2患者中的有效性,我们在中国CIN2患者中进行了这项前瞻性队列研究。方法:229例CIN2患者入组。根据患者意愿分为PDT组(n=94)和LEEP组(n=135)。在3、6、12和18个月的随访期间,使用细胞学、HPV检测和阴道镜检查对患者进行评估。结果:随访3个月,PDT组疾病回归正常或CIN1的比率分别为76.6%(72/94)和13.8% (13/94),LEEP组分别为80.7%(109/135)和11.1%(15/135)。Logistic回归分析显示,3型转化区是PDT的唯一危险因素(OR=3.68;95% ci, 2.43-5.26;P=0.008)和LEEP组(OR=2.34;95% ci, 1.84-4.53;P = 0.02)。PDT组治疗效果逐渐提高,随访18个月达到顶峰,疾病消失率为90.4%,消退率为8.5%。LEEP组疾病消失和消退率在治疗后半年最高,疾病消失和消退率分别为87.4%和12.6%。随访18个月时,PDT组和LEEP组hrhpv阴性率最高(78.7%和74.8%)。两组在随访时间点的消失率和回归率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:我们的研究表明5-ALA PDT治疗和LEEP治疗CIN2都是非常有效的。5-ALA-PDT作为一种非侵入性治疗,可能是有生育能力保存需求的CIN2患者的有效选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.20%
发文量
509
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy is an international journal for the dissemination of scientific knowledge and clinical developments of Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy in all medical specialties. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, case presentations, "how-to-do-it" articles, Letters to the Editor, short communications and relevant images with short descriptions. All submitted material is subject to a strict peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
Agreement of anterior corneal aberrations between a Placido-disk-based wavefront analyzer and a Scheimpflug system in myopic candidates for refractive surgery Risk factors for intraoperative hypotension associated with the use of oral 5-aminolevulinic acid as a photodynamic diagnostic agent in transurethral resection of bladder tumors: A meta-analysis Comparative assessment of 638-nm Diode laser photobiomodulation against chemical remineralizing agents for primary caries-affected dentin: Mechanistic investigation of photothermal effects on bonding substrate quality A meta-analysis of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Based on randomized controlled trials Comparison of predictive efficacy of Sirius and Pentacam in predicting postoperative vault height after ICL implantation: a propensity score matched study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1