Open-access Measurement Uncertainty Calculator MUCalc and its application to the quantification of Etizolam in tablets using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, LEGAL Science & Justice Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.scijus.2024.11.001
Joyce K. Klu, Roberto Puch-Solis, Roy Mudie, Victoria Marland, Niamh Nic Daeid
{"title":"Open-access Measurement Uncertainty Calculator MUCalc and its application to the quantification of Etizolam in tablets using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)","authors":"Joyce K. Klu,&nbsp;Roberto Puch-Solis,&nbsp;Roy Mudie,&nbsp;Victoria Marland,&nbsp;Niamh Nic Daeid","doi":"10.1016/j.scijus.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The assessment of measurement uncertainty of an analytic method is a requirement for forensic toxicologists and drug chemists. There are two main methods for estimating measurement uncertainty: the bottom-up and the top-down approaches. The bottom-up approach has been suggested in current practice guides including ‘Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM)’ published by ISO, and a guide to ‘Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement’ published by EURACHEM. To support forensic practitioners needing to estimate measurement uncertainty, we have developed an open-access Measurement Uncertainty Calculator (MUCalc) based on a bottom-up approach. The software quantifies measurement uncertainty associated with sample homogeneity, method precision, calibration curve, calibration standard and sample preparation. These are then combined to estimate the combined and the expanded uncertainty. The calculations are carried out in accordance with standards set out by accreditation organisations such as ISO/IEC Guid 98, GUM, EURACHEM and UKAS. MUCalc is unique in the sense that it is a white box. It displays on screen all formulae and step-by-step guide calculations in an easy-to-follow approach. This makes it easy for users to understand and cross-examine every result generated by MUCalc. Such a transparent display of the workings of the calculation is essential for the purposes of disclosure within the legal domain. It also facilitates training in the calculation of measurement uncertainties. We demonstrate the use of MUCalc for estimating the uncertainty associated with the quantification of the concentration of etizolam, a benzodiazepine implicated in a large percentage of drug-related deaths in Scotland.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49565,"journal":{"name":"Science & Justice","volume":"65 1","pages":"Pages 70-81"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Justice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355030624001060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The assessment of measurement uncertainty of an analytic method is a requirement for forensic toxicologists and drug chemists. There are two main methods for estimating measurement uncertainty: the bottom-up and the top-down approaches. The bottom-up approach has been suggested in current practice guides including ‘Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM)’ published by ISO, and a guide to ‘Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement’ published by EURACHEM. To support forensic practitioners needing to estimate measurement uncertainty, we have developed an open-access Measurement Uncertainty Calculator (MUCalc) based on a bottom-up approach. The software quantifies measurement uncertainty associated with sample homogeneity, method precision, calibration curve, calibration standard and sample preparation. These are then combined to estimate the combined and the expanded uncertainty. The calculations are carried out in accordance with standards set out by accreditation organisations such as ISO/IEC Guid 98, GUM, EURACHEM and UKAS. MUCalc is unique in the sense that it is a white box. It displays on screen all formulae and step-by-step guide calculations in an easy-to-follow approach. This makes it easy for users to understand and cross-examine every result generated by MUCalc. Such a transparent display of the workings of the calculation is essential for the purposes of disclosure within the legal domain. It also facilitates training in the calculation of measurement uncertainties. We demonstrate the use of MUCalc for estimating the uncertainty associated with the quantification of the concentration of etizolam, a benzodiazepine implicated in a large percentage of drug-related deaths in Scotland.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science & Justice
Science & Justice 医学-病理学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
98
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: Science & Justice provides a forum to promote communication and publication of original articles, reviews and correspondence on subjects that spark debates within the Forensic Science Community and the criminal justice sector. The journal provides a medium whereby all aspects of applying science to legal proceedings can be debated and progressed. Science & Justice is published six times a year, and will be of interest primarily to practising forensic scientists and their colleagues in related fields. It is chiefly concerned with the publication of formal scientific papers, in keeping with its international learned status, but will not accept any article describing experimentation on animals which does not meet strict ethical standards. Promote communication and informed debate within the Forensic Science Community and the criminal justice sector. To promote the publication of learned and original research findings from all areas of the forensic sciences and by so doing to advance the profession. To promote the publication of case based material by way of case reviews. To promote the publication of conference proceedings which are of interest to the forensic science community. To provide a medium whereby all aspects of applying science to legal proceedings can be debated and progressed. To appeal to all those with an interest in the forensic sciences.
期刊最新文献
Human factors in triaging forensic items: Casework pressures and ambiguity aversion Evaluating the scope of peer review in digital Forensics: Insights from Norway and the U.K. Scientific imperialism : “The judge made me do it!” The persistence of fibres following a choreographed assault: A quantitative assessment of the influence of physical activity Transfer and persistence of owner DNA on domestic pets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1