Solid-state esophageal pressure sensor for the estimation of pleural pressure: a bench and first-in-human validation study

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1186/s13054-025-05279-w
Julien P. van Oosten, Nico Goedendorp, Amne Mousa, Rutger C. Flink, Rik Schaart, Merel Flinsenberg, Peter Somhorst, Diederik A. M. P. J. Gommers, Leo Heunks, Annemijn H. Jonkman
{"title":"Solid-state esophageal pressure sensor for the estimation of pleural pressure: a bench and first-in-human validation study","authors":"Julien P. van Oosten, Nico Goedendorp, Amne Mousa, Rutger C. Flink, Rik Schaart, Merel Flinsenberg, Peter Somhorst, Diederik A. M. P. J. Gommers, Leo Heunks, Annemijn H. Jonkman","doi":"10.1186/s13054-025-05279-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advanced respiratory monitoring through the measurement of esophageal pressure (Pes) as a surrogate of pleural pressure helps guiding mechanical ventilation in ICU patients. Pes measurement with an esophageal balloon catheter, the current clinical reference standard, needs complex calibrations and a multitude of factors influence its reliability. Solid-state pressure sensors might be able to overcome these limitations. To evaluate the accuracy of a new solid-state Pes transducer (Pessolid). We hypothesized that measurements are non-inferior to those obtained with a properly calibrated balloon catheter (Pesbal). Absolute and relative solid-state sensor Pes measurements were compared to a reference pressure in a 5-day bench setup, and to simultaneously placed balloon catheters in 15 spontaneously breathing healthy volunteers and in 16 mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Bland–Altman analysis was performed using mixed effects modelling with bootstrapping to estimate bias and upper and lower limits of agreement (LoA) and their confidence intervals. Bench study: Solid-state pressure transducers had a positive bias (Psolid – Pref) of around 1 cmH2O for the absolute minimal and maximum pressures, and no bias for pressure swings. Healthy volunteers: the solid-state transducer revealed a bias (i.e., Pessolid – Pesbal) [upper LoA; lower LoA] of 1.59 [8.21; − 5.02], − 2.32 [4.27; − 8.92] and 3.91 [11.04; − 3.23] cmH2O for end-expiratory, end-inspiratory and ΔPes values, respectively. ICU patients: the solid-state transducer showed a bias (Pessolid–Pesbal) [upper LoA; lower LoA] during controlled/assisted ventilation of: − 0.15 [1.41; − 1.72]/− 0.19 [5.23; − 5.62], 0.32 [3.45; − 2.82]/− 0.54 [4.81; − 5.90] and 0.47 [3.90; − 2.96]/0.35 [4.01; − 3.31] cmH2O for end-expiratory, end-inspiratory and ΔPes values, respectively. LoA were ≤ 2cmH2O for static measurements on controlled ventilation. The novel solid-state pressure transducer showed good accuracy on the bench, in healthy volunteers and in ventilated ICU-patients. This could contribute to the implementation of Pes as advanced respiratory monitoring technique. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05817968 (patient study). Registered on 18 April 2023.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05279-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advanced respiratory monitoring through the measurement of esophageal pressure (Pes) as a surrogate of pleural pressure helps guiding mechanical ventilation in ICU patients. Pes measurement with an esophageal balloon catheter, the current clinical reference standard, needs complex calibrations and a multitude of factors influence its reliability. Solid-state pressure sensors might be able to overcome these limitations. To evaluate the accuracy of a new solid-state Pes transducer (Pessolid). We hypothesized that measurements are non-inferior to those obtained with a properly calibrated balloon catheter (Pesbal). Absolute and relative solid-state sensor Pes measurements were compared to a reference pressure in a 5-day bench setup, and to simultaneously placed balloon catheters in 15 spontaneously breathing healthy volunteers and in 16 mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Bland–Altman analysis was performed using mixed effects modelling with bootstrapping to estimate bias and upper and lower limits of agreement (LoA) and their confidence intervals. Bench study: Solid-state pressure transducers had a positive bias (Psolid – Pref) of around 1 cmH2O for the absolute minimal and maximum pressures, and no bias for pressure swings. Healthy volunteers: the solid-state transducer revealed a bias (i.e., Pessolid – Pesbal) [upper LoA; lower LoA] of 1.59 [8.21; − 5.02], − 2.32 [4.27; − 8.92] and 3.91 [11.04; − 3.23] cmH2O for end-expiratory, end-inspiratory and ΔPes values, respectively. ICU patients: the solid-state transducer showed a bias (Pessolid–Pesbal) [upper LoA; lower LoA] during controlled/assisted ventilation of: − 0.15 [1.41; − 1.72]/− 0.19 [5.23; − 5.62], 0.32 [3.45; − 2.82]/− 0.54 [4.81; − 5.90] and 0.47 [3.90; − 2.96]/0.35 [4.01; − 3.31] cmH2O for end-expiratory, end-inspiratory and ΔPes values, respectively. LoA were ≤ 2cmH2O for static measurements on controlled ventilation. The novel solid-state pressure transducer showed good accuracy on the bench, in healthy volunteers and in ventilated ICU-patients. This could contribute to the implementation of Pes as advanced respiratory monitoring technique. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05817968 (patient study). Registered on 18 April 2023.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
期刊最新文献
Effect of an intensive care unit virtual reality intervention on relatives´ mental health distress: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial Enhancing depression risk assessment in critical care nurses: a call for quantitative modeling Clinical subtypes in critically ill patients with sepsis: validation and parsimonious classifier model development Relationship between skin microvascular blood flow and capillary refill time in critically ill patients Trendelenburg position is a reasonable alternative to passive leg raising for predicting volume responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1