Treatment of Surgical Scars with Fractional Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Laser: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Advances in wound care Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1089/wound.2024.0213
Liang Chen, Han Xu, Qiu Yu Wang, Peng Chen, Lin Qi Wang, Xiao Ming Qin
{"title":"Treatment of Surgical Scars with Fractional Carbon Dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) Laser: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Liang Chen, Han Xu, Qiu Yu Wang, Peng Chen, Lin Qi Wang, Xiao Ming Qin","doi":"10.1089/wound.2024.0213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Object:</b> The aim of this study was to compare the long-term effects of fractional carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) laser treatment with traditional therapy on surgical scars by analyzing and comparing observational indicators. <b>Approach:</b> A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 116 patients who received scar treatment in our hospital, of which 58 patients received fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser treatment, and 58 patients received injection treatment. The outcome measures comprised the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). The observation intervals occur at specific times. Evaluated at 6 months of follow-up, the outcome was blinded, on-site evaluation using the dermatological appearance scale (DAS) and visual analog scale (VAS). <b>Results:</b> Patients in the fractional carbon-dioxide laser (CO<sub>2</sub>FL) group rated better than those in the injection group in the POSAS, VSS, DAS, and VAS scores (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The therapeutic efficacy and patients' satisfaction of the research group were superior to those in the control group. <b>Innovation:</b> Scars following surgical procedures can be treated in a variety of methods, but there is no consensus on the best method. CO<sub>2</sub>FL has exhibited safety and is more effective than traditional injection treatments for surgical scars. It is a worthwhile approach to consider in clinical treatment. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study demonstrates that CO<sub>2</sub>FL achieves more significant long-term results in surgical scars, including improved scar appearance, safety, and patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2024.0213","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Object: The aim of this study was to compare the long-term effects of fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser treatment with traditional therapy on surgical scars by analyzing and comparing observational indicators. Approach: A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 116 patients who received scar treatment in our hospital, of which 58 patients received fractional CO2 laser treatment, and 58 patients received injection treatment. The outcome measures comprised the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). The observation intervals occur at specific times. Evaluated at 6 months of follow-up, the outcome was blinded, on-site evaluation using the dermatological appearance scale (DAS) and visual analog scale (VAS). Results: Patients in the fractional carbon-dioxide laser (CO2FL) group rated better than those in the injection group in the POSAS, VSS, DAS, and VAS scores (p < 0.05). The therapeutic efficacy and patients' satisfaction of the research group were superior to those in the control group. Innovation: Scars following surgical procedures can be treated in a variety of methods, but there is no consensus on the best method. CO2FL has exhibited safety and is more effective than traditional injection treatments for surgical scars. It is a worthwhile approach to consider in clinical treatment. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that CO2FL achieves more significant long-term results in surgical scars, including improved scar appearance, safety, and patient satisfaction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in wound care
Advances in wound care Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
4.10%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Advances in Wound Care rapidly shares research from bench to bedside, with wound care applications for burns, major trauma, blast injuries, surgery, and diabetic ulcers. The Journal provides a critical, peer-reviewed forum for the field of tissue injury and repair, with an emphasis on acute and chronic wounds. Advances in Wound Care explores novel research approaches and practices to deliver the latest scientific discoveries and developments. Advances in Wound Care coverage includes: Skin bioengineering, Skin and tissue regeneration, Acute, chronic, and complex wounds, Dressings, Anti-scar strategies, Inflammation, Burns and healing, Biofilm, Oxygen and angiogenesis, Critical limb ischemia, Military wound care, New devices and technologies.
期刊最新文献
An Open-Label, Interventional, Prospective, Real-World Evidence Study to Evaluate a Multimodal Wound Matrix in Patients with Refractory Wounds. Prevalent Types of Peristomal Skin Damage During Chemoradiotherapy and Their Risk Factors. Structured Exercise Therapy Increases Endogenous Antioxidants to Repair Muscle Strength and Health in Porcine Ischemic Myopathy Model of Peripheral Artery Disease. Muscle Fibrosis, NF-κB, and TGF-β Are Differentially Altered in Two Models of Paralysis (Botox Versus Neurectomy). In Sequence Antifibrotic Treatment and Rehabilitation after Volumetric Muscle Loss Injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1