A Food Pantry Nutrition Education Program RCT: Food Choices and Diet-Quality.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American Journal of Health Promotion Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1177/08901171251316370
Bhagyashree Katare, Brittni Echols, Zoe Plakias, Rodolfo M Nayaga, Krystal L Hodge
{"title":"A Food Pantry Nutrition Education Program RCT: Food Choices and Diet-Quality.","authors":"Bhagyashree Katare, Brittni Echols, Zoe Plakias, Rodolfo M Nayaga, Krystal L Hodge","doi":"10.1177/08901171251316370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeFood pantries have provided nutrition education to promote healthy food choices with mixed outcomes. This study assessed the impact of Guided Stars food quality rating system to promote healthy food choices among food pantry clients.DesignRandomized parallel-group study with balanced randomization.SettingA client-choice food pantry in a midwestern city.Subjects613 food pantry clients.InterventionClients were randomly assigned to a one-time treatment group (n = 330) where they received a nutrition information sheet with pantry foods ranked using the Guided Starts rating system, or a control group (n = 299) that did not receive this information.Measure(s)Healthy food selection; food selection quality measured by a Healthy Index.AnalysisMultiple linear regression models to estimate the effect of the intervention on the food choices of the food pantry client, accounting for potential confounders.ResultsResults showed a decrease (-.021, <i>P</i> < .05) in the selection of lower nutrition-rated food items, particularly among men.ConclusionFood-labeling nutrition education strategies could help promote healthy food choices at food pantries, especially among future-biased clients. However, an information-based intervention alone may not be enough to alter food choices in low-income populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"824-827"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251316370","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeFood pantries have provided nutrition education to promote healthy food choices with mixed outcomes. This study assessed the impact of Guided Stars food quality rating system to promote healthy food choices among food pantry clients.DesignRandomized parallel-group study with balanced randomization.SettingA client-choice food pantry in a midwestern city.Subjects613 food pantry clients.InterventionClients were randomly assigned to a one-time treatment group (n = 330) where they received a nutrition information sheet with pantry foods ranked using the Guided Starts rating system, or a control group (n = 299) that did not receive this information.Measure(s)Healthy food selection; food selection quality measured by a Healthy Index.AnalysisMultiple linear regression models to estimate the effect of the intervention on the food choices of the food pantry client, accounting for potential confounders.ResultsResults showed a decrease (-.021, P < .05) in the selection of lower nutrition-rated food items, particularly among men.ConclusionFood-labeling nutrition education strategies could help promote healthy food choices at food pantries, especially among future-biased clients. However, an information-based intervention alone may not be enough to alter food choices in low-income populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食品储藏室营养教育项目:食物选择和饮食质量。
目的:食品分发处提供营养教育,以促进健康食品的选择,结果好坏参半。本研究评估了引导星级食品质量评级系统在食品储藏室客户中促进健康食品选择的影响。设计:平衡随机化的随机平行组研究。背景:位于中西部城市的一个客户选择的食品储藏室。研究对象:613名食品储藏室客户。干预:客户被随机分配到一次性治疗组(n = 330)和对照组(n = 299),实验组收到一份营养信息表,上面有使用指导开始评级系统对食品进行排名。食物选择质量由健康指数衡量。分析:采用多元线性回归模型估计干预对食品储藏室客户食物选择的影响,并考虑潜在的混杂因素。结果:结果显示(-。021, P < 0.05),尤其是在男性中。结论:食品标签营养教育策略有助于促进食品分发处的健康食品选择,特别是在那些对未来有偏见的客户中。然而,单靠基于信息的干预可能不足以改变低收入人群的食物选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
期刊最新文献
A Brief Motivational Enhancement Intervention to Promote COVID-19 Testing and Vaccination Among People Who Inject Drugs: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Connect2Test. Strengthening America's Care Infrastructure by Recognizing and Supporting Sandwich Caregivers. Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Indoor No-Smoking Policies at Home Among Chinese American Female Non-Smokers. Public Policy to Support the Health of Caregivers in the Workforce. The Role of Community Health Workers in Tobacco Cessation: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1