Validity of Diagnosis Codes to Identify a Dermatomyositis Cohort from Electronic Health Records.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Dermatology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1159/000543803
Alex Silberzweig, Andrew Strunk, Elizabeth Flatley, Anthony P Fernandez, Amit Garg
{"title":"Validity of Diagnosis Codes to Identify a Dermatomyositis Cohort from Electronic Health Records.","authors":"Alex Silberzweig, Andrew Strunk, Elizabeth Flatley, Anthony P Fernandez, Amit Garg","doi":"10.1159/000543803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dermatomyositis (DM) is an uncommon idiopathic inflammatory myopathy resulting in characteristic patterns of cutaneous lesions and myositis. Observational evidence related to the disease is limited by small case cohorts. We aimed to evaluate the validity of specialist-specific diagnostic coding for DM in an outpatient clinical database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults having an outpatient encounter between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2023, at a US regional health system with ICD-9/-10 coding for DM were identified. We randomly sampled 156 patients with ≥1 code applied by a dermatologist or rheumatologist. The primary reference standard for case adjudication was a confirmed diagnosis of DM by the treating physician in the medical chart. Fulfilment of the 2017 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) criteria for \"probable\" or \"definite\" DM was used as a secondary, more stringent reference standard. Positive predictive values (PPVs) for several case definitions were calculated with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among eligible patients, the median age was 51.5 years, and 81% were female. Using the treating physician's diagnosis as reference, PPVs of ≥1 and ≥2 codes applied by a dermatologist were 93.2% (95% CI 82.0-98.3%) and 96.4% (82.2-99.8%), respectively. The PPVs of ≥1 and ≥2 codes from a rheumatologist were 82.0% (77.1-86.9%) and 85.8% (80.6-91.1%), respectively. At least one and at least two codes from a rheumatologist or dermatologist had PPVs of 82.1% (77.3-86.8%) and 85.7% (80.7-90.8%), respectively. The rate of confirmed cases based on EULAR/ACR criteria ranged from 44.9% to 57.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All tested algorithms yielded an accurate case cohort with high PPV. Studies prioritizing sensitivity may use ≥1 code by dermatology or rheumatology to identify patients with DM.</p>","PeriodicalId":11185,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"216-222"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543803","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Dermatomyositis (DM) is an uncommon idiopathic inflammatory myopathy resulting in characteristic patterns of cutaneous lesions and myositis. Observational evidence related to the disease is limited by small case cohorts. We aimed to evaluate the validity of specialist-specific diagnostic coding for DM in an outpatient clinical database.

Methods: Adults having an outpatient encounter between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2023, at a US regional health system with ICD-9/-10 coding for DM were identified. We randomly sampled 156 patients with ≥1 code applied by a dermatologist or rheumatologist. The primary reference standard for case adjudication was a confirmed diagnosis of DM by the treating physician in the medical chart. Fulfilment of the 2017 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) criteria for "probable" or "definite" DM was used as a secondary, more stringent reference standard. Positive predictive values (PPVs) for several case definitions were calculated with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Among eligible patients, the median age was 51.5 years, and 81% were female. Using the treating physician's diagnosis as reference, PPVs of ≥1 and ≥2 codes applied by a dermatologist were 93.2% (95% CI 82.0-98.3%) and 96.4% (82.2-99.8%), respectively. The PPVs of ≥1 and ≥2 codes from a rheumatologist were 82.0% (77.1-86.9%) and 85.8% (80.6-91.1%), respectively. At least one and at least two codes from a rheumatologist or dermatologist had PPVs of 82.1% (77.3-86.8%) and 85.7% (80.7-90.8%), respectively. The rate of confirmed cases based on EULAR/ACR criteria ranged from 44.9% to 57.1%.

Conclusion: All tested algorithms yielded an accurate case cohort with high PPV. Studies prioritizing sensitivity may use ≥1 code by dermatology or rheumatology to identify patients with DM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诊断代码从电子健康记录中识别皮肌炎队列的有效性。
简介:皮肌炎(DM)是一种罕见的特发性炎性肌病,导致皮肤病变和肌炎的特征性模式。与该疾病相关的观察性证据受到小病例队列的限制。我们的目的是评估门诊临床数据库中糖尿病专科诊断编码的有效性。方法:在2010年1月1日至2023年6月30日期间在美国区域卫生系统门诊就诊的成年人中识别出ICD-9/-10编码的糖尿病。我们随机抽取156名患者,他们的>1代码由皮肤科医生或风湿病学家应用。病例判定的主要参考标准是由主治医师在病历中确诊为糖尿病。2017年欧洲风湿病协会联盟/美国风湿病学会(EULAR/ACR)“可能”或“确定”DM的标准被用作次要的、更严格的参考标准。几种病例定义的阳性预测值(ppv)以95%置信区间计算。结果:符合条件的患者中位年龄为51.5岁,81%为女性。以主治医师诊断为参照,皮肤科医生应用>和>编码的ppv分别为93.2% (95% CI 82.0% ~ 98.3%)和96.4%(82.2% ~ 99.8%)。来自风湿病专家的>和>编码的PPVs分别为82.0%(77.1% ~ 86.9%)和85.8%(80.6% ~ 91.1%)。来自风湿病学家或皮肤科医生的至少一个和至少两个代码的ppv分别为82.1%(77.3%-86.8%)和85.7%(80.7%-90.8%)。基于EULAR/ACR标准的确诊病例率为44.9%至57.1%。结论:所有经过测试的算法都产生了准确的高PPV病例队列。优先考虑敏感性的研究可以使用皮肤病学或风湿病学的>1代码来识别糖尿病患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dermatology
Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1893, ''Dermatology'' provides a worldwide survey of clinical and investigative dermatology. Original papers report clinical and laboratory findings. In order to inform readers of the implications of recent research, editorials and reviews prepared by invited, internationally recognized scientists are regularly featured. In addition to original papers, the journal publishes rapid communications, short communications, and letters to ''Dermatology''. ''Dermatology'' answers the complete information needs of practitioners concerned with progress in research related to skin, clinical dermatology and therapy. The journal enjoys a high scientific reputation with a continually increasing impact factor and an equally high circulation.
期刊最新文献
Assessing disease progression in Hurley I hidradenitis suppurativa patients: a nested case-control study. Epidemiology and trends of nail disorders (2014-2024): A single tertiary-center study. Applications of the Non-invasive Skin Imaging Techniques and Image-based Artificial Intelligence in Rosacea: A Narrative Review. A genome-wide association study of hidradenitis suppurativa from the VA's Million Veteran Program. Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Selected Echocardiographic Parameters in Male Patients with Psoriasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1