Exploring the Implementation of Cognitive Screening in First-Episode Psychosis Settings: The CogScreen Implementation Study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Early Intervention in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1111/eip.70004
Isabel Zbukvic, Evangeline Fisher, Alexandra Stainton, Shayden Bryce, Dzenana Kartal, Marina Kunin, Jennifer Nicholas, Craig Hamilton, Desiree Smith, Mackenzie Murphy, Joshua Llerena, Lee Unsworth, Nicholas Cheng, Stephen C Bowden, Symphony Chakma, Scott Richard Clark, Shona Francey, Caroline Gao, Donna Gee, Elle Gelok, Anthony Harris, Lilianne Hatfield, Liza Hopkins, Rachel Morell, Chris O'Halloran, Scot Purdon, K Oliver Schubert, Alana Scully, Hejun Tang, Adrian Thomas, Andrew Thompson, Jacqueline Uren, Stephen J Wood, Wendi Zhao, Kelly Allott
{"title":"Exploring the Implementation of Cognitive Screening in First-Episode Psychosis Settings: The CogScreen Implementation Study.","authors":"Isabel Zbukvic, Evangeline Fisher, Alexandra Stainton, Shayden Bryce, Dzenana Kartal, Marina Kunin, Jennifer Nicholas, Craig Hamilton, Desiree Smith, Mackenzie Murphy, Joshua Llerena, Lee Unsworth, Nicholas Cheng, Stephen C Bowden, Symphony Chakma, Scott Richard Clark, Shona Francey, Caroline Gao, Donna Gee, Elle Gelok, Anthony Harris, Lilianne Hatfield, Liza Hopkins, Rachel Morell, Chris O'Halloran, Scot Purdon, K Oliver Schubert, Alana Scully, Hejun Tang, Adrian Thomas, Andrew Thompson, Jacqueline Uren, Stephen J Wood, Wendi Zhao, Kelly Allott","doi":"10.1111/eip.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Accurate and appropriate cognitive screening can significantly enhance early psychosis care, yet no screening tools have been validated for the early psychosis population and little is known about current screening practices, experiences, or factors that may influence implementation. CogScreen is a hybrid type 1 study aiming to validate two promising screening tools with young people with first episode psychosis (primary aim) and to understand the context for implementing cognitive screening in early psychosis settings (secondary aim). This protocol outlines the implementation study, which aims to explore the current practices, acceptability, feasibility and determinants of cognitive screening in early psychosis settings from the perspective of key stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Young people with first episode psychosis (n = 350), caregivers (minimum n = 10) and service providers (minimum n = 12) will be recruited from primary and specialist early psychosis services in Melbourne, Adelaide and Sydney, Australia. Two implementation science frameworks will inform data collection and analysis: the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. A mixed-methods design will be employed to collect and analyse data from questionnaires with young people, interviews with all stakeholder groups, and administrative processes. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data will be analysed through content analysis using deductive and inductive coding.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>This protocol paper presents the rationale and methods for the CogScreen implementation study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Together with accuracy findings, results from the implementation study will provide insights about the practices, experiences, enablers and barriers to cognitive screening in early psychosis services.</p>","PeriodicalId":11385,"journal":{"name":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","volume":"19 2","pages":"e70004"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.70004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Accurate and appropriate cognitive screening can significantly enhance early psychosis care, yet no screening tools have been validated for the early psychosis population and little is known about current screening practices, experiences, or factors that may influence implementation. CogScreen is a hybrid type 1 study aiming to validate two promising screening tools with young people with first episode psychosis (primary aim) and to understand the context for implementing cognitive screening in early psychosis settings (secondary aim). This protocol outlines the implementation study, which aims to explore the current practices, acceptability, feasibility and determinants of cognitive screening in early psychosis settings from the perspective of key stakeholders.

Methods: Young people with first episode psychosis (n = 350), caregivers (minimum n = 10) and service providers (minimum n = 12) will be recruited from primary and specialist early psychosis services in Melbourne, Adelaide and Sydney, Australia. Two implementation science frameworks will inform data collection and analysis: the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. A mixed-methods design will be employed to collect and analyse data from questionnaires with young people, interviews with all stakeholder groups, and administrative processes. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data will be analysed through content analysis using deductive and inductive coding.

Results and discussion: This protocol paper presents the rationale and methods for the CogScreen implementation study.

Conclusion: Together with accuracy findings, results from the implementation study will provide insights about the practices, experiences, enablers and barriers to cognitive screening in early psychosis services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Early Intervention in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Early Intervention in Psychiatry publishes original research articles and reviews dealing with the early recognition, diagnosis and treatment across the full range of mental and substance use disorders, as well as the underlying epidemiological, biological, psychological and social mechanisms that influence the onset and early course of these disorders. The journal provides comprehensive coverage of early intervention for the full range of psychiatric disorders and mental health problems, including schizophrenia and other psychoses, mood and anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders and personality disorders. Papers in any of the following fields are considered: diagnostic issues, psychopathology, clinical epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatments and other forms of intervention, clinical trials, health services and economic research and mental health policy. Special features are also published, including hypotheses, controversies and snapshots of innovative service models.
期刊最新文献
Young Adult Perspectives on Treatment Engagement and Family Communication During Psychosis. Criminal Offending and Incarceration in United States Adults With Early Phase Psychosis and Comorbid Substance Use Disorder. Exploring the Implementation of Cognitive Screening in First-Episode Psychosis Settings: The CogScreen Implementation Study. Understanding Participation in Integrated Youth Mental Health Service Research: Lessons Learned From a Feasibility Study With Jigsaw. Evaluating Response to a Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Psychosis-Informed Family Intervention at Variable Duration of a Psychotic Illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1