Isabel Zbukvic, Evangeline Fisher, Alexandra Stainton, Shayden Bryce, Dzenana Kartal, Marina Kunin, Jennifer Nicholas, Craig Hamilton, Desiree Smith, Mackenzie Murphy, Joshua Llerena, Lee Unsworth, Nicholas Cheng, Stephen C Bowden, Symphony Chakma, Scott Richard Clark, Shona Francey, Caroline Gao, Donna Gee, Elle Gelok, Anthony Harris, Lilianne Hatfield, Liza Hopkins, Rachel Morell, Chris O'Halloran, Scot Purdon, K Oliver Schubert, Alana Scully, Hejun Tang, Adrian Thomas, Andrew Thompson, Jacqueline Uren, Stephen J Wood, Wendi Zhao, Kelly Allott
{"title":"Exploring the Implementation of Cognitive Screening in First-Episode Psychosis Settings: The CogScreen Implementation Study.","authors":"Isabel Zbukvic, Evangeline Fisher, Alexandra Stainton, Shayden Bryce, Dzenana Kartal, Marina Kunin, Jennifer Nicholas, Craig Hamilton, Desiree Smith, Mackenzie Murphy, Joshua Llerena, Lee Unsworth, Nicholas Cheng, Stephen C Bowden, Symphony Chakma, Scott Richard Clark, Shona Francey, Caroline Gao, Donna Gee, Elle Gelok, Anthony Harris, Lilianne Hatfield, Liza Hopkins, Rachel Morell, Chris O'Halloran, Scot Purdon, K Oliver Schubert, Alana Scully, Hejun Tang, Adrian Thomas, Andrew Thompson, Jacqueline Uren, Stephen J Wood, Wendi Zhao, Kelly Allott","doi":"10.1111/eip.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Accurate and appropriate cognitive screening can significantly enhance early psychosis care, yet no screening tools have been validated for the early psychosis population and little is known about current screening practices, experiences, or factors that may influence implementation. CogScreen is a hybrid type 1 study aiming to validate two promising screening tools with young people with first episode psychosis (primary aim) and to understand the context for implementing cognitive screening in early psychosis settings (secondary aim). This protocol outlines the implementation study, which aims to explore the current practices, acceptability, feasibility and determinants of cognitive screening in early psychosis settings from the perspective of key stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Young people with first episode psychosis (n = 350), caregivers (minimum n = 10) and service providers (minimum n = 12) will be recruited from primary and specialist early psychosis services in Melbourne, Adelaide and Sydney, Australia. Two implementation science frameworks will inform data collection and analysis: the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. A mixed-methods design will be employed to collect and analyse data from questionnaires with young people, interviews with all stakeholder groups, and administrative processes. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data will be analysed through content analysis using deductive and inductive coding.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>This protocol paper presents the rationale and methods for the CogScreen implementation study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Together with accuracy findings, results from the implementation study will provide insights about the practices, experiences, enablers and barriers to cognitive screening in early psychosis services.</p>","PeriodicalId":11385,"journal":{"name":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","volume":"19 2","pages":"e70004"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.70004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Accurate and appropriate cognitive screening can significantly enhance early psychosis care, yet no screening tools have been validated for the early psychosis population and little is known about current screening practices, experiences, or factors that may influence implementation. CogScreen is a hybrid type 1 study aiming to validate two promising screening tools with young people with first episode psychosis (primary aim) and to understand the context for implementing cognitive screening in early psychosis settings (secondary aim). This protocol outlines the implementation study, which aims to explore the current practices, acceptability, feasibility and determinants of cognitive screening in early psychosis settings from the perspective of key stakeholders.
Methods: Young people with first episode psychosis (n = 350), caregivers (minimum n = 10) and service providers (minimum n = 12) will be recruited from primary and specialist early psychosis services in Melbourne, Adelaide and Sydney, Australia. Two implementation science frameworks will inform data collection and analysis: the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. A mixed-methods design will be employed to collect and analyse data from questionnaires with young people, interviews with all stakeholder groups, and administrative processes. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data will be analysed through content analysis using deductive and inductive coding.
Results and discussion: This protocol paper presents the rationale and methods for the CogScreen implementation study.
Conclusion: Together with accuracy findings, results from the implementation study will provide insights about the practices, experiences, enablers and barriers to cognitive screening in early psychosis services.
期刊介绍:
Early Intervention in Psychiatry publishes original research articles and reviews dealing with the early recognition, diagnosis and treatment across the full range of mental and substance use disorders, as well as the underlying epidemiological, biological, psychological and social mechanisms that influence the onset and early course of these disorders. The journal provides comprehensive coverage of early intervention for the full range of psychiatric disorders and mental health problems, including schizophrenia and other psychoses, mood and anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders and personality disorders. Papers in any of the following fields are considered: diagnostic issues, psychopathology, clinical epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatments and other forms of intervention, clinical trials, health services and economic research and mental health policy. Special features are also published, including hypotheses, controversies and snapshots of innovative service models.