Markus Flörs, Gerhard Schertzinger, Helena Pannekens, Wolfram Seitz, Christian Zwiener, Rudi Winzenbacher
{"title":"High-performance thin-layer chromatography-umu combined with nontarget analysis-a sensitive genotoxicity screening tool applicable for potable water analysis.","authors":"Markus Flörs, Gerhard Schertzinger, Helena Pannekens, Wolfram Seitz, Christian Zwiener, Rudi Winzenbacher","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgae076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monitoring of genotoxic chemicals released into the water cycle or formed through transformation processes is critical to prevent harm to human health. The development of the high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC)-umu bioassay combines sample separation and detection of genotoxic substances in the low ng/L concentration range. In this study, raw, process, and drinking water samples from 11 different waterworks in Germany were analyzed using the HPTLC-umu. A genotoxic response was detected in three out of 42 samples (one raw water sample and two drinking water samples). Genotoxicity testing using the micronucleus and p53-CALUX (chemical activated luciferase gene expression) assays revealed genotoxic effects for the raw water sample and one of the drinking water samples. Fortunately, only minor genotoxic effects could be detected in the two drinking water samples, with estimated 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide equivalency concentrations of 0.12 ng/L and 0.17 ng/L, respectively. After extraction of the genotoxic zones from HPTLC plates, identification attempts were conducted with nontarget analysis (NTA). A prioritization approach based on chlorine and bromine isotope pattern revealed several halogenated features for both drinking water samples. These tentatively identified substances were previously reported in the literature as possible carcinogens. Although the detected features could not be conclusively identified, the presence of halogenated features in the genotoxic effective zone of the HPTLC-umu assay strongly suggests that the chlorine disinfection process in both waterworks was responsible for the formation of the genotoxic substances in the drinking water samples. These findings emphasize that the HPTLC-umu in combination with additional genotoxicity assays and NTA can be used to evaluate even relatively clean samples, such as drinking water.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgae076","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Monitoring of genotoxic chemicals released into the water cycle or formed through transformation processes is critical to prevent harm to human health. The development of the high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC)-umu bioassay combines sample separation and detection of genotoxic substances in the low ng/L concentration range. In this study, raw, process, and drinking water samples from 11 different waterworks in Germany were analyzed using the HPTLC-umu. A genotoxic response was detected in three out of 42 samples (one raw water sample and two drinking water samples). Genotoxicity testing using the micronucleus and p53-CALUX (chemical activated luciferase gene expression) assays revealed genotoxic effects for the raw water sample and one of the drinking water samples. Fortunately, only minor genotoxic effects could be detected in the two drinking water samples, with estimated 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide equivalency concentrations of 0.12 ng/L and 0.17 ng/L, respectively. After extraction of the genotoxic zones from HPTLC plates, identification attempts were conducted with nontarget analysis (NTA). A prioritization approach based on chlorine and bromine isotope pattern revealed several halogenated features for both drinking water samples. These tentatively identified substances were previously reported in the literature as possible carcinogens. Although the detected features could not be conclusively identified, the presence of halogenated features in the genotoxic effective zone of the HPTLC-umu assay strongly suggests that the chlorine disinfection process in both waterworks was responsible for the formation of the genotoxic substances in the drinking water samples. These findings emphasize that the HPTLC-umu in combination with additional genotoxicity assays and NTA can be used to evaluate even relatively clean samples, such as drinking water.
期刊介绍:
The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...]
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.