The added value of ECG abnormalities in predicting incident cardiovascular disease risk for people with type 2 diabetes: The Hoorn Diabetes Care System cohort.

IF 7.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European journal of preventive cardiology Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf033
Peter P Harms, Reinier A R Herings, Sharon Remmelzwaal, Femke Rutters, Joline W J Beulens, Giel Nijpels, Petra P J M Elders, Marieke T Blom
{"title":"The added value of ECG abnormalities in predicting incident cardiovascular disease risk for people with type 2 diabetes: The Hoorn Diabetes Care System cohort.","authors":"Peter P Harms, Reinier A R Herings, Sharon Remmelzwaal, Femke Rutters, Joline W J Beulens, Giel Nijpels, Petra P J M Elders, Marieke T Blom","doi":"10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate if adding ECG abnormalities as a predictor improves the performance of incident CVD-risk prediction models for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the four major prediction models that are recommended by the guidelines of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology, in 11,224 people with T2D without CVD (coronary heart disease, heart failure, stroke, thrombosis) from the Hoorn Diabetes Care System cohort (1998-2018). Baseline measurements included CVD-risk factors and ECG recordings coded according to the Minnesota Classification as no, minor or major abnormalities. After confirming good reference model fit, model performance was assessed before and after addition of ECG abnormalities and compared using c-statistics, net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>C-statistics (95%CI) of reference models (ASCVD, AD-ON, ADVANCE and SCORE2-Diabetes) were 0.67 (0.65-0.70), 0.73 (0.71-0.76), 0.71 (0.68-0.74) and 0.67 (0.65-0.69), respectively. Adding ECG abnormalities as predictor improved c-statistics with +0.02 (0.01-0.03), +0.01 (0.00-0.01), +0.02 (0.01-0.03), and +0.02 (0.01-0.02), respectively. Reclassification indicators also showed improvement: categorical NRI (+6%, +3%, +8%, and +5%), continuous NRI (95%CI) 0.25 (0.08-0.37), 0.32 (0.23-0.42), 0.54 (0.34-0.69) and 0.28 (0.09-0.33)), and IDI (95%CI) 0.005 (0.001-0.010), 0.002 (-0.001-0.007), 0.006 (0.001-0.007) and 0.004 (0.000-0.006)). Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of ECG abnormalities to incident CVD-risk prediction models moderately but consistently improves the ability of models to correctly classify people with T2D in the appropriate CVD-risk category with up to 8%, which is approximately equivalent to many established predictors and (bio)markers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12051,"journal":{"name":"European journal of preventive cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To investigate if adding ECG abnormalities as a predictor improves the performance of incident CVD-risk prediction models for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Methods: We evaluated the four major prediction models that are recommended by the guidelines of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology, in 11,224 people with T2D without CVD (coronary heart disease, heart failure, stroke, thrombosis) from the Hoorn Diabetes Care System cohort (1998-2018). Baseline measurements included CVD-risk factors and ECG recordings coded according to the Minnesota Classification as no, minor or major abnormalities. After confirming good reference model fit, model performance was assessed before and after addition of ECG abnormalities and compared using c-statistics, net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

Results: C-statistics (95%CI) of reference models (ASCVD, AD-ON, ADVANCE and SCORE2-Diabetes) were 0.67 (0.65-0.70), 0.73 (0.71-0.76), 0.71 (0.68-0.74) and 0.67 (0.65-0.69), respectively. Adding ECG abnormalities as predictor improved c-statistics with +0.02 (0.01-0.03), +0.01 (0.00-0.01), +0.02 (0.01-0.03), and +0.02 (0.01-0.02), respectively. Reclassification indicators also showed improvement: categorical NRI (+6%, +3%, +8%, and +5%), continuous NRI (95%CI) 0.25 (0.08-0.37), 0.32 (0.23-0.42), 0.54 (0.34-0.69) and 0.28 (0.09-0.33)), and IDI (95%CI) 0.005 (0.001-0.010), 0.002 (-0.001-0.007), 0.006 (0.001-0.007) and 0.004 (0.000-0.006)). Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results.

Conclusion: The addition of ECG abnormalities to incident CVD-risk prediction models moderately but consistently improves the ability of models to correctly classify people with T2D in the appropriate CVD-risk category with up to 8%, which is approximately equivalent to many established predictors and (bio)markers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心电图异常在预测2型糖尿病患者心血管疾病风险中的附加价值:霍恩糖尿病护理系统队列
目的:研究加入ECG异常作为预测因子是否能提高2型糖尿病(T2D)患者心血管疾病风险预测模型的性能。方法:我们评估了美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会和欧洲心脏病学会指南推荐的四种主要预测模型,对来自Hoorn糖尿病护理系统队列(1998-2018)的11,224例无CVD的T2D患者(冠心病、心力衰竭、中风、血栓形成)进行了评估。基线测量包括心血管疾病危险因素和心电图记录,根据明尼苏达分类编码为无、轻微或严重异常。在确认参考模型拟合良好后,评估添加ECG异常前后的模型性能,并使用c-statistics、净重分类改善(NRI)和综合判别改善(IDI)进行比较。结果:参考模型(ASCVD、AD-ON、ADVANCE和SCORE2-Diabetes)的c -统计量(95%CI)分别为0.67(0.65 ~ 0.70)、0.73(0.71 ~ 0.76)、0.71(0.68 ~ 0.74)和0.67(0.65 ~ 0.69)。添加ECG异常作为预测因子,c-统计量分别提高+0.02(0.01-0.03)、+0.01(0.00-0.01)、+0.02(0.01-0.03)和+0.02(0.01-0.02)。再分类指标也有所改善:分类NRI(+6%, +3%, +8%和+5%),连续NRI (95%CI) 0.25(0.08-0.37), 0.32(0.23-0.42), 0.54(0.34-0.69)和0.28 (0.09-0.33),IDI (95%CI) 0.005(0.001-0.010), 0.002(-0.001-0.007), 0.006(0.001-0.007)和0.004(0.000-0.006)。敏感性分析得出了类似的结果。结论:在事件cvd风险预测模型中加入ECG异常,适度但持续地提高了模型将T2D患者正确分类为适当cvd风险类别的能力,提高了8%,这与许多已建立的预测因子和(生物)标志物大致相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of preventive cardiology
European journal of preventive cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
601
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (EJPC) is an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). The journal covers a wide range of scientific, clinical, and public health disciplines related to cardiovascular disease prevention, risk factor management, cardiovascular rehabilitation, population science and public health, and exercise physiology. The categories covered by the journal include classical risk factors and treatment, lifestyle risk factors, non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular conditions, concomitant pathological conditions, sport cardiology, diagnostic tests, care settings, epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacotherapy, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.
期刊最新文献
Cardiac rehabilitation against frailty and sarcopenia in older individuals: a literature review. Association of myocardial injury with adverse long-term survival among cancer patients. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a cardio-oncology rehabilitation framework compared to an exercise intervention for cancer survivors with high cardiovascular risk. Acute cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity: can we overcome it by exercise training? Cardiovascular risk in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: challenges and future directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1