The efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy treatment for advanced esophageal cancer: a network meta-analysis.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2024.1515263
Jian-Zhou Tian, Li Zhang, Fu-Yong Lin, Ren-Jiao He, Wen-Rong Tian, Liu Yan, Guo-Xin Huang, Jin-Wei Ai, Bin Pei, De-Sheng Li
{"title":"The efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy treatment for advanced esophageal cancer: a network meta-analysis.","authors":"Jian-Zhou Tian, Li Zhang, Fu-Yong Lin, Ren-Jiao He, Wen-Rong Tian, Liu Yan, Guo-Xin Huang, Jin-Wei Ai, Bin Pei, De-Sheng Li","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2024.1515263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study systematically evaluated the efficacy of programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors combined with chemotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer (EC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify related randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs involving 4,363 participants were included. The results of the direct comparison showed that, compared with chemotherapy alone, PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.63-0.74), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.58-0.67), objective response rate (ORR) (RR = 1.41, 95%CI = 1.28-1.57), but were associated with a slight increase in treatment-related adverse events (AEs) (RR = 1.08, 95%CI = 1.03-1.14). The results of the network meta-analysis showed that toripalimab, sintilimab or camrelizumab, and nivolumab combined with chemotherapy were the best in OS, PFS, and ORR, respectively, with camrelizumab showing the lowest incidence of AEs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy provide superior clinical benefits over chemotherapy alone, albeit with a moderate increase in AEs. However, further verification through multi-center, high-quality RCTs with larger sample sizes is needed to confirm these findings.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration https//wwwcrdyorkacuk/prospero/display_recordphp?id=crd42024627485: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"1515263"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1515263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study systematically evaluated the efficacy of programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors combined with chemotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer (EC).

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify related randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Results: Seven RCTs involving 4,363 participants were included. The results of the direct comparison showed that, compared with chemotherapy alone, PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.63-0.74), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.58-0.67), objective response rate (ORR) (RR = 1.41, 95%CI = 1.28-1.57), but were associated with a slight increase in treatment-related adverse events (AEs) (RR = 1.08, 95%CI = 1.03-1.14). The results of the network meta-analysis showed that toripalimab, sintilimab or camrelizumab, and nivolumab combined with chemotherapy were the best in OS, PFS, and ORR, respectively, with camrelizumab showing the lowest incidence of AEs.

Conclusion: These results suggest that PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy provide superior clinical benefits over chemotherapy alone, albeit with a moderate increase in AEs. However, further verification through multi-center, high-quality RCTs with larger sample sizes is needed to confirm these findings.

Systematic review registration https//wwwcrdyorkacuk/prospero/display_recordphp?id=crd42024627485:

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PD-1抑制剂联合化疗治疗晚期食管癌的疗效和安全性:一项网络荟萃分析
目的:系统评价程序性死亡1 (PD-1)抑制剂联合化疗治疗晚期食管癌(EC)的疗效。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus和Cochrane Library,确定相关的随机对照试验(rct)。结果:纳入7项随机对照试验,共4363名受试者。直接比较的结果表明,与单独化疗相比,PD-1抑制剂结合化疗显著提高总生存期(OS) (HR = 0.69,95% ci = 0.63 - -0.74),无进展生存(PFS) (HR = 0.63,95% ci = 0.58 - -0.67),客观缓解率(ORR) (RR = 1.41,95% ci = 1.28 - -1.57),但与治疗相关的不良事件略有增加(AEs) (RR = 1.08,95% ci = 1.03 - -1.14)。网络荟萃分析结果显示,托利帕单抗、辛替单抗或卡莫来珠单抗和纳武单抗联合化疗分别在OS、PFS和ORR方面表现最佳,其中卡莫来珠单抗ae发生率最低。结论:这些结果表明,PD-1抑制剂联合化疗比单独化疗有更好的临床疗效,尽管ae会适度增加。然而,需要通过多中心、高质量、更大样本量的随机对照试验进一步验证这些发现。系统评论注册https// www.crdyorkacuk /prospero/display_recordphp?id = crd42024627485:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
期刊最新文献
Correction: Oregon primary care providers as a frontline defense in the War on Melanoma™: improving access to melanoma education. Correction: Melanoma toolkit for early detection for primary care clinicians: a 1-year follow-up on outcomes. Flexible intubating video endoscope-guided determination of optimal oral endotracheal tube depth in infants: a prospective observational study. Exploring the association of mechanical power with mortality and phenotypes among patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective analysis. Histological signatures of hormone replacement therapy in the endometrium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1