Predicting functional outcomes of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage based on explainable machine learning models: a multicenter retrospective study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2025-01-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2024.1494934
Bin Pan, Fengda Li, Chuanghong Liu, Zeyi Li, Chengfa Sun, Kaijian Xia, Hong Xu, Gang Kong, Longyuan Gu, Kaiyuan Cheng
{"title":"Predicting functional outcomes of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage based on explainable machine learning models: a multicenter retrospective study.","authors":"Bin Pan, Fengda Li, Chuanghong Liu, Zeyi Li, Chengfa Sun, Kaijian Xia, Hong Xu, Gang Kong, Longyuan Gu, Kaiyuan Cheng","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2024.1494934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) is the second most common cause of cerebrovascular disease after ischemic stroke, with high mortality and disability rates, imposing a significant economic burden on families and society. This retrospective study aimed to develop and evaluate an interpretable machine learning model to predict functional outcomes 3 months after SICH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 380 patients with SICH who were hospitalized at three different centers between June 2020 and June 2023. Seventy percent of the samples were randomly selected as the training set, while the remaining 30% were used as the validation set. Univariate analysis, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression, and Pearson correlation analysis were used to screen clinical variables. The selected variables were then incorporated into five machine learning models: complementary naive bayes (CNB), support vector machine (SVM), gaussian naive bayes (GNB), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB), to assess their performance. Additionally, the area under the curve (AUC) values were evaluated to compare the performance of each algorithmic model, and global and individual interpretive analyses were conducted using importance ranking and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 380 patients, 95 ultimately had poor prognostic outcomes. In the validation set, the AUC values for CNB, SVM, GNB, MLP, and XGB models were 0.899 (0.816-0.979), 0.916 (0.847-0.982), 0.730 (0.602-0.857), 0.913 (0.834-0.986), and 0.969 (0.937-0.998), respectively. Therefore, the XGB model performed the best among the five algorithms. SHAP analysis revealed that the GCS score, hematoma volume, blood pressure changes, platelets, age, bleeding location, and blood glucose levels were the most important variables for poor prognosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The XGB model developed in this study can effectively predict the risk of poor prognosis in patients with SICH, helping clinicians make personalized and rational clinical decisions. Prognostic risk in patients with SICH is closely associated with GCS score, hematoma volume, blood pressure changes, platelets, age, bleeding location, and blood glucose levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1494934"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1494934","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) is the second most common cause of cerebrovascular disease after ischemic stroke, with high mortality and disability rates, imposing a significant economic burden on families and society. This retrospective study aimed to develop and evaluate an interpretable machine learning model to predict functional outcomes 3 months after SICH.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 380 patients with SICH who were hospitalized at three different centers between June 2020 and June 2023. Seventy percent of the samples were randomly selected as the training set, while the remaining 30% were used as the validation set. Univariate analysis, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression, and Pearson correlation analysis were used to screen clinical variables. The selected variables were then incorporated into five machine learning models: complementary naive bayes (CNB), support vector machine (SVM), gaussian naive bayes (GNB), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB), to assess their performance. Additionally, the area under the curve (AUC) values were evaluated to compare the performance of each algorithmic model, and global and individual interpretive analyses were conducted using importance ranking and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP).

Results: Among the 380 patients, 95 ultimately had poor prognostic outcomes. In the validation set, the AUC values for CNB, SVM, GNB, MLP, and XGB models were 0.899 (0.816-0.979), 0.916 (0.847-0.982), 0.730 (0.602-0.857), 0.913 (0.834-0.986), and 0.969 (0.937-0.998), respectively. Therefore, the XGB model performed the best among the five algorithms. SHAP analysis revealed that the GCS score, hematoma volume, blood pressure changes, platelets, age, bleeding location, and blood glucose levels were the most important variables for poor prognosis.

Conclusion: The XGB model developed in this study can effectively predict the risk of poor prognosis in patients with SICH, helping clinicians make personalized and rational clinical decisions. Prognostic risk in patients with SICH is closely associated with GCS score, hematoma volume, blood pressure changes, platelets, age, bleeding location, and blood glucose levels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于可解释的机器学习模型预测自发性脑出血患者的功能结局:一项多中心回顾性研究
背景:自发性脑出血(siich)是继缺血性脑卒中之后脑血管疾病的第二大常见病因,死亡率和致残率高,给家庭和社会造成了巨大的经济负担。这项回顾性研究旨在开发和评估可解释的机器学习模型,以预测SICH后3 个月的功能结果。方法:回顾性分析2020年6月至2023年6月在3个不同中心住院的380例SICH患者的临床资料。随机抽取70%的样本作为训练集,剩余30%作为验证集。采用单因素分析、最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归及Pearson相关分析筛选临床变量。然后将选定的变量纳入五种机器学习模型:互补朴素贝叶斯(CNB)、支持向量机(SVM)、高斯朴素贝叶斯(GNB)、多层感知器(MLP)和极端梯度增强(XGB),以评估它们的性能。此外,评估曲线下面积(AUC)值以比较每种算法模型的性能,并使用重要性排序和Shapley加性解释(SHAP)进行全局和个体解释分析。结果:在380例患者中,95例最终预后不良。在验证集中,CNB、SVM、GNB、MLP和XGB模型的AUC值分别为0.899(0.816-0.979)、0.916(0.847-0.982)、0.730(0.602-0.857)、0.913(0.834-0.986)和0.969(0.937-0.998)。因此,XGB模型在5种算法中表现最好。SHAP分析显示,GCS评分、血肿量、血压变化、血小板、年龄、出血部位和血糖水平是影响预后不良的最重要变量。结论:本研究建立的XGB模型可有效预测SICH患者预后不良风险,帮助临床医生做出个性化、合理的临床决策。SICH患者的预后风险与GCS评分、血肿量、血压变化、血小板、年龄、出血部位和血糖水平密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
期刊最新文献
Comparative effects of six rehabilitation therapies on lower limb function and gait function in stroke patients: a network meta-analysis of 33 RCTs. Comparative effects of resistance- and assistance-based robot training on brain activation and motor recovery in stroke patients. Diagnostic performance of one visual aura image in identifying migraine with aura. Development and validation of a predictive model for cognitive impairment after first-episode acute ischemic stroke without reperfusion therapy. Contrast extravasation on Dyna-CT as a predictor of malignant brain edema after mechanical thrombectomy for acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1