Multimodal assessment predicts cognitive impairment after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective cohort study.

IF 10.1 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY International journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000002239
Peng Liu, Ruili Li, Tongyu Zhang, Yueqiao Xu, Kun Yang, Yuxia Li, Chuanliang Han, Yang Yang, Changming Wang, Jie Lu, Hongqi Zhang
{"title":"Multimodal assessment predicts cognitive impairment after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Peng Liu, Ruili Li, Tongyu Zhang, Yueqiao Xu, Kun Yang, Yuxia Li, Chuanliang Han, Yang Yang, Changming Wang, Jie Lu, Hongqi Zhang","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk factors and mechanisms of cognitive impairment (CI) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) are unclear. This study used a neuropsychological battery, MRI, ERP and CSF and plasma biomarkers to predict long-term cognitive impairment after aSAH.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>214 patients hospitalized with aSAH (n = 125) or unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) (n = 89) were included in this prospective cohort study. Neuropsychological tests were administered 7 to 24 months post-discharge. MRI, ERP, and CSF and plasma biomarkers were used to predict long-term CI, and area under ROC curves were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with aSAH CI showed significant impairment across composite scores and cognitive domains on the neuropsychological battery vs. patients with aSAH No CI. On ALFF (MRI), the right medial orbitofrontal cortex (AUC = 0.78), right inferior frontal gyrus (AUC = 0.848), and right inferior parietal lobule (AUC = 0.868) distinguished aSAH CI from aSAH No CI. For ERP, consistent changes were found across specific EEG electrodes (FP1, F3, CP1, FP2, F4, CP2), including increased PA, prolonged PL and decreased ITPC. ITPC showed the highest sensitivity for distinguishing aSAH CI from aSAH No CI, followed by PA. Channel F4 (ITPC, AUC = 0.912, PA, AUC = 0.846), corresponding to the right inferior frontal gyrus, was the most sensitive for detecting CI, followed by channel CP2 (ITPC, AUC = 0.903, PA, AUC = 0.806), corresponding to the right inferior parietal lobule. CSF (Aβ42, Aβ40, p-tau181/Aβ42, p-tau181/total-tau, total-tau) and plasma biomarkers (Aβ-40, p-tau181) were significantly associated with long-term CI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ALFF, ERP, and CSF and plasma Aβ and tau levels and ratios have clinical utility for evaluating and predicting long-term cognitive impairment following aSAH. MRI may reveal the pathogenesis of cognitive impairment following aSAH. ERP can be administered at the bedside offering sensitive, non-invasive, repeatable, and sustainable monitoring, which is particularly suitable for immobile coma patients. ERP may represent a promising method to monitor neural function and its outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1977-1987"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002239","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Risk factors and mechanisms of cognitive impairment (CI) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) are unclear. This study used a neuropsychological battery, MRI, ERP and CSF and plasma biomarkers to predict long-term cognitive impairment after aSAH.

Materials and methods: 214 patients hospitalized with aSAH (n = 125) or unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) (n = 89) were included in this prospective cohort study. Neuropsychological tests were administered 7 to 24 months post-discharge. MRI, ERP, and CSF and plasma biomarkers were used to predict long-term CI, and area under ROC curves were calculated.

Results: Patients with aSAH CI showed significant impairment across composite scores and cognitive domains on the neuropsychological battery vs. patients with aSAH No CI. On ALFF (MRI), the right medial orbitofrontal cortex (AUC = 0.78), right inferior frontal gyrus (AUC = 0.848), and right inferior parietal lobule (AUC = 0.868) distinguished aSAH CI from aSAH No CI. For ERP, consistent changes were found across specific EEG electrodes (FP1, F3, CP1, FP2, F4, CP2), including increased PA, prolonged PL and decreased ITPC. ITPC showed the highest sensitivity for distinguishing aSAH CI from aSAH No CI, followed by PA. Channel F4 (ITPC, AUC = 0.912, PA, AUC = 0.846), corresponding to the right inferior frontal gyrus, was the most sensitive for detecting CI, followed by channel CP2 (ITPC, AUC = 0.903, PA, AUC = 0.806), corresponding to the right inferior parietal lobule. CSF (Aβ42, Aβ40, p-tau181/Aβ42, p-tau181/total-tau, total-tau) and plasma biomarkers (Aβ-40, p-tau181) were significantly associated with long-term CI.

Conclusion: ALFF, ERP, and CSF and plasma Aβ and tau levels and ratios have clinical utility for evaluating and predicting long-term cognitive impairment following aSAH. MRI may reveal the pathogenesis of cognitive impairment following aSAH. ERP can be administered at the bedside offering sensitive, non-invasive, repeatable, and sustainable monitoring, which is particularly suitable for immobile coma patients. ERP may represent a promising method to monitor neural function and its outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多模式评估预测动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后的认知障碍:一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景:动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)后认知障碍(CI)的危险因素和机制尚不清楚。本研究使用神经心理电池、MRI、ERP、CSF和血浆生物标志物来预测aSAH后的长期认知障碍。材料和方法:本前瞻性队列研究纳入214例aSAH(125例)或未破裂颅内动脉瘤(UIA)(89例)住院患者。出院后7至24个月进行神经心理测试。MRI、ERP、CSF和血浆生物标志物用于预测长期CI,并计算ROC曲线下面积。结果:与非aSAH CI患者相比,aSAH CI患者在神经心理电池的综合评分和认知领域表现出显著的损伤。在ALFF (MRI)上,右侧眶额内侧皮层(AUC = 0.78)、右侧额下回(AUC = 0.848)和右侧顶叶下小叶(AUC = 0.868)区分aSAH CI和aSAH No CI。对于ERP,在特定EEG电极(FP1, F3, CP1, FP2, F4, CP2)上发现一致的变化,包括PA增加,PL延长和ITPC降低。ITPC对aSAH CI和aSAH No CI的敏感度最高,其次是PA。右侧额下回对应的F4通道(ITPC, AUC = 0.912, PA, AUC = 0.846)对CI的检测最为敏感,其次是右侧顶叶下小叶对应的CP2通道(ITPC, AUC = 0.903, PA, AUC = 0.806)。CSF (Aβ42, Aβ40, p-tau181/Aβ42, p-tau181/total-tau, total-tau)和血浆生物标志物(Aβ-40, p-tau181)与长期CI显著相关。结论:ALFF、ERP、CSF和血浆Aβ、tau水平及比值对aSAH后长期认知功能障碍的评估和预测具有临床应用价值。MRI可以揭示aSAH后认知功能障碍的发病机制。ERP可以在床边进行管理,提供敏感、无创、可重复和可持续的监测,特别适用于固定昏迷患者。ERP可能是一种很有前途的监测神经功能及其结果的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
期刊最新文献
General vs regional anesthesia: differential effects on postoperative anxiety, depression, and stress biomarkers in arthroscopic knee surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Comprehensive assessment of postoperative metachronous liver metastasis risk in colon cancer based on inflammatory indicators: a multicenter prospective study. Comment on "Artificial Intelligence for predicting post-excision recurrence and malignant progression in oral potentially malignant disorders: a retrospective cohort study". Coronal imbalance and intervertebral disc degeneration in degenerative scoliosis: an analysis using Hounsfield units measurement. Device-measured physical activity and long-term outcomes in IBD: promise, plausibility, and clinical translation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1