First-Attempt Success in Ultrasound-Guided vs Standard Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion: The EPIC Superiority Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 18 1区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS JAMA Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.5581
Tricia M Kleidon, Jessica A Schults, Ruth H Royle, Victoria Gibson, Robert S Ware, Elizabeth Andresen, Paula Cattanach, Anna Dean, Colleen Pitt, Malanda Ramstedt, Joshua Byrnes, Patrick Nelmes, Claire M Rickard, Amanda J Ullman
{"title":"First-Attempt Success in Ultrasound-Guided vs Standard Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion: The EPIC Superiority Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Tricia M Kleidon, Jessica A Schults, Ruth H Royle, Victoria Gibson, Robert S Ware, Elizabeth Andresen, Paula Cattanach, Anna Dean, Colleen Pitt, Malanda Ramstedt, Joshua Byrnes, Patrick Nelmes, Claire M Rickard, Amanda J Ullman","doi":"10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.5581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Pediatric peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion can be difficult and time-consuming, frequently requiring multiple insertion attempts and often resulting in increased anxiety, distress, and treatment avoidance among children and their families. Ultrasound-guided PIVC insertion is a superior alternative to standard technique (palpation and visualization) in high-risk patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare first-time insertion success of PIVCs inserted with ultrasound guidance compared with standard technique (palpation and visualization) across all risk categories in the general pediatric hospital population.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>An open-label, pragmatic, superiority, randomized clinical trial was conducted in an Australian quaternary pediatric hospital. Children (ages 0-18 years) requiring PIVC insertion were included between July 2021 and December 2022. One catheter was studied per patient, and analysis was by intention to treat. Data analysis was performed from April to October 2023.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Eligible children were randomly assigned (1:1 using computer-generated randomization and concealed allocation) to receive ultrasound-guided or standard PIVC insertion. Randomization was stratified by insertion difficulty (low, medium, or high risk) defined using a standardized tool.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was first-time insertion success. Secondary outcomes included number of insertion attempts, insertion failure, postinsertion complications, dwell time, patient and parent satisfaction, and health care costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 164 children were randomly assigned to ultrasound-guided insertion (n = 84) or standard care (n = 80), with 81 (96.4%) and 78 (97.5%) receiving their allocated intervention, respectively. The median (IQR) age was 24 (10-120) months, and 93 children (56.7%) were male. First-time insertion success was higher with ultrasound-guided PIVC insertion (72 children [85.7%]) compared with standard technique (26 children [32.5%]) (risk difference [RD], 53.6%; 95% CI, 41.7%-65.4%; P < .001). Ultrasound-guided insertion led to significantly greater first-time insertion success across all risk categories, with the following RDs: low risk, 30.8% (95% CI, 8.1%-53.5%); medium risk, 56.2% (95% CI, 37.1%-75.3%); and high risk, 69.6% (95% CI, 52.3%-87.0%). Ultrasound-guided PIVC insertion had higher immediate health care costs (between group difference in total mean cost per person, A$9.33; 95% credible interval, A$8.83-A$10.86 [US $5.83; 95% credible interval, $5.52-$6.78]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>These findings suggest that ultrasound-guided PIVC insertion improves first-time insertion success across all risk categories in pediatrics, supporting the widespread adoption of ultrasound-guided PIVC insertion in children.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12621000206820.</p>","PeriodicalId":14683,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"255-263"},"PeriodicalIF":18.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.5581","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Pediatric peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion can be difficult and time-consuming, frequently requiring multiple insertion attempts and often resulting in increased anxiety, distress, and treatment avoidance among children and their families. Ultrasound-guided PIVC insertion is a superior alternative to standard technique (palpation and visualization) in high-risk patients.

Objective: To compare first-time insertion success of PIVCs inserted with ultrasound guidance compared with standard technique (palpation and visualization) across all risk categories in the general pediatric hospital population.

Design, setting, and participants: An open-label, pragmatic, superiority, randomized clinical trial was conducted in an Australian quaternary pediatric hospital. Children (ages 0-18 years) requiring PIVC insertion were included between July 2021 and December 2022. One catheter was studied per patient, and analysis was by intention to treat. Data analysis was performed from April to October 2023.

Intervention: Eligible children were randomly assigned (1:1 using computer-generated randomization and concealed allocation) to receive ultrasound-guided or standard PIVC insertion. Randomization was stratified by insertion difficulty (low, medium, or high risk) defined using a standardized tool.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was first-time insertion success. Secondary outcomes included number of insertion attempts, insertion failure, postinsertion complications, dwell time, patient and parent satisfaction, and health care costs.

Results: A total of 164 children were randomly assigned to ultrasound-guided insertion (n = 84) or standard care (n = 80), with 81 (96.4%) and 78 (97.5%) receiving their allocated intervention, respectively. The median (IQR) age was 24 (10-120) months, and 93 children (56.7%) were male. First-time insertion success was higher with ultrasound-guided PIVC insertion (72 children [85.7%]) compared with standard technique (26 children [32.5%]) (risk difference [RD], 53.6%; 95% CI, 41.7%-65.4%; P < .001). Ultrasound-guided insertion led to significantly greater first-time insertion success across all risk categories, with the following RDs: low risk, 30.8% (95% CI, 8.1%-53.5%); medium risk, 56.2% (95% CI, 37.1%-75.3%); and high risk, 69.6% (95% CI, 52.3%-87.0%). Ultrasound-guided PIVC insertion had higher immediate health care costs (between group difference in total mean cost per person, A$9.33; 95% credible interval, A$8.83-A$10.86 [US $5.83; 95% credible interval, $5.52-$6.78]).

Conclusion and relevance: These findings suggest that ultrasound-guided PIVC insertion improves first-time insertion success across all risk categories in pediatrics, supporting the widespread adoption of ultrasound-guided PIVC insertion in children.

Trial registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12621000206820.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导与标准外周静脉导管置入的首次尝试成功:EPIC优势随机临床试验。
重要性:小儿外周静脉导管(PIVC)的插入是困难且耗时的,经常需要多次插入尝试,并经常导致儿童及其家庭的焦虑、痛苦和治疗逃避增加。超声引导下的PIVC插入在高危患者中是一种优于标准技术(触诊和可视化)的方法。目的:比较超声引导下与标准技术(触诊和可视化)在普通儿科医院人群中所有风险类别的首次插入pivc的成功率。设计、环境和参与者:在澳大利亚一家第四儿科医院进行了一项开放标签、实用、优势、随机临床试验。在2021年7月至2022年12月期间纳入需要植入PIVC的儿童(0-18岁)。每位患者研究一根导管,并根据治疗意向进行分析。数据分析时间为2023年4月至10月。干预:符合条件的儿童随机分配(1:1)接受超声引导或标准PIVC插入。随机化通过使用标准化工具定义的插入难度(低、中、高风险)进行分层。主要观察指标:主要观察指标为首次插入成功。次要结局包括插入次数、插入失败、插入后并发症、停留时间、患者和家长满意度以及医疗费用。结果:164例患儿随机分为超声引导下插入组(n = 84)和标准治疗组(n = 80),分别有81例(96.4%)和78例(97.5%)患儿接受了相应的干预。中位(IQR)年龄为24(10-120)个月,男性93例(56.7%)。超声引导下PIVC首次置入成功率(72例[85.7%])高于标准技术(26例[32.5%])(风险差[RD], 53.6%;95% ci, 41.7% ~ 65.4%;结论及相关性:这些发现提示超声引导下PIVC插入提高了儿科所有风险类别的首次插入成功率,支持超声引导下PIVC插入在儿童中的广泛采用。试验注册:anzctr.org.au标识符:ACTRN12621000206820。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Pediatrics
JAMA Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
31.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
357
期刊介绍: JAMA Pediatrics, the oldest continuously published pediatric journal in the US since 1911, is an international peer-reviewed publication and a part of the JAMA Network. Published weekly online and in 12 issues annually, it garners over 8.4 million article views and downloads yearly. All research articles become freely accessible online after 12 months without any author fees, and through the WHO's HINARI program, the online version is accessible to institutions in developing countries. With a focus on advancing the health of infants, children, and adolescents, JAMA Pediatrics serves as a platform for discussing crucial issues and policies in child and adolescent health care. Leveraging the latest technology, it ensures timely access to information for its readers worldwide.
期刊最新文献
"Conversion Therapy" in the US-Progress, Missed Opportunities, and Future Directions. Cognitive and Educational Outcomes After Preterm Birth or Low Birth Weight: An Umbrella Review and Meta-Analysis. Parent-Reported Chronic Pain in Children With and Without Developmental Disabilities. What Parents Need to Know About Moles in Children Long-Term Cardiometabolic Outcomes in Children With Metabolically Healthy and Unhealthy Obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1