Precision of stereophotogrammetry in complete arch implant recordings: A clinical study

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.12.021
Maria Estibalez-Recasens DDS, MSc , Carlos Serrano-Granger MD, DDS, MSc, PhD , Andrea Santamaría-Laorden DDS, MSc, PhD , Cristina Andreu-Vázquez PhD , Jaime Orejas-Pérez DDS, MSc, PhD
{"title":"Precision of stereophotogrammetry in complete arch implant recordings: A clinical study","authors":"Maria Estibalez-Recasens DDS, MSc ,&nbsp;Carlos Serrano-Granger MD, DDS, MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Andrea Santamaría-Laorden DDS, MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Cristina Andreu-Vázquez PhD ,&nbsp;Jaime Orejas-Pérez DDS, MSc, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.12.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><div>Stereophotogrammetry has been proposed as an alternative to intraoral scanners for recording the location of multiple dental implants. Most studies evaluating its accuracy have been in vitro, and clinical studies are lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the precision of a stereophotogrammetry system for complete arch prostheses supported by 6 implants.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>A total of 10 participants with a completely edentulous maxilla with 6 multiunit implant abutments were recruited. For each participant, 5 recordings were made using a stereophotogrammetry device (PIC system; PIC dental). From the resulting standard tessellation language (STL) files, linear and angular Euclidean distances were recorded. A statistical analysis of the measurements obtained was used to determine their repeatability and to identify maximum discrepancy values. A comparative analysis of the standard deviation values was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Sidak statistical tests. (α=.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For linear distances, the mean ±standard deviation precision was 14.71 ±12.2 µm, with a maximum discrepancy of 61 µm. For the angular measurements, the mean ±standard deviation precision was 0.072 ±0.064 degrees, with a maximum discrepancy of 0.345 degrees. Statistically significant differences (<em>P</em>&lt;.05) were found among the different implant spans.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results suggested that the stereophotogrammetry device was sufficiently precise for recording implant locations in complete arch prostheses supported by 6 implant abutments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":"133 5","pages":"Pages 1242-1249"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391325000058","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem

Stereophotogrammetry has been proposed as an alternative to intraoral scanners for recording the location of multiple dental implants. Most studies evaluating its accuracy have been in vitro, and clinical studies are lacking.

Purpose

The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the precision of a stereophotogrammetry system for complete arch prostheses supported by 6 implants.

Material and methods

A total of 10 participants with a completely edentulous maxilla with 6 multiunit implant abutments were recruited. For each participant, 5 recordings were made using a stereophotogrammetry device (PIC system; PIC dental). From the resulting standard tessellation language (STL) files, linear and angular Euclidean distances were recorded. A statistical analysis of the measurements obtained was used to determine their repeatability and to identify maximum discrepancy values. A comparative analysis of the standard deviation values was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Sidak statistical tests. (α=.05).

Results

For linear distances, the mean ±standard deviation precision was 14.71 ±12.2 µm, with a maximum discrepancy of 61 µm. For the angular measurements, the mean ±standard deviation precision was 0.072 ±0.064 degrees, with a maximum discrepancy of 0.345 degrees. Statistically significant differences (P<.05) were found among the different implant spans.

Conclusions

The results suggested that the stereophotogrammetry device was sufficiently precise for recording implant locations in complete arch prostheses supported by 6 implant abutments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全牙弓种植记录中的立体摄影测量精度:临床研究。
问题说明:立体摄影测量已被提议作为口腔内扫描仪的替代方法,用于记录多个牙种植体的位置。大多数评估其准确性的研究都是在体外进行的,缺乏临床研究。目的:本临床研究的目的是评估立体摄影测量系统对6个种植体支撑的全弓修复体的精度。材料与方法:选取10例上颌全无牙伴6个多单元种植基牙的患者。每个参与者使用立体摄影测量设备(PIC系统)进行5次记录;图片牙)。从由此产生的标准镶嵌语言(STL)文件,线性和角欧几里得距离被记录。对所获得的测量结果进行统计分析,以确定其可重复性并确定最大差异值。采用Kruskal-Wallis和Sidak统计检验对标准差值进行比较分析。(α= . 05)。结果:对于线性距离,平均±标准差精度为14.71±12.2µm,最大误差为61µm;角度测量的平均±标准差精度为0.072±0.064度,最大误差为0.345度。结论:在6个种植基牙支撑的全弓修复体中,立体摄影测量仪能够准确记录种植体的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor regarding, "Comparing the performance of ChatGPT 4o, DeepSeek R1, and Gemini 2 Pro in answering fixed prosthodontics questions over time" by Shirani. Evaluating point cloud density, surface topography, and accuracy across six extraoral scanners: A correlational and 3-dimensional (3D) comparative study. Accuracy of static and dynamic occlusion simulation of virtual articulation compared with a conventional articulator: A systematic review. Deep learning-based object detection of dental implant systems in panoramic and periapical radiographs. Letter to the Editor regarding, "Prosthetically driven implant placement: A simplified method for optimal emergence angle of anterior implants".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1