Precision of stereophotogrammetry in complete arch implant recordings: A clinical study.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.12.021
Maria Estibalez-Recasens, Carlos Serrano-Granger, Andrea Santamaría-Laorden, Cristina Andreu-Vázquez, Jaime Orejas-Pérez
{"title":"Precision of stereophotogrammetry in complete arch implant recordings: A clinical study.","authors":"Maria Estibalez-Recasens, Carlos Serrano-Granger, Andrea Santamaría-Laorden, Cristina Andreu-Vázquez, Jaime Orejas-Pérez","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.12.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Stereophotogrammetry has been proposed as an alternative to intraoral scanners for recording the location of multiple dental implants. Most studies evaluating its accuracy have been in vitro, and clinical studies are lacking.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the precision of a stereophotogrammetry system for complete arch prostheses supported by 6 implants.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 10 participants with a completely edentulous maxilla with 6 multiunit implant abutments were recruited. For each participant, 5 recordings were made using a stereophotogrammetry device (PIC system; PIC dental). From the resulting standard tessellation language (STL) files, linear and angular Euclidean distances were recorded. A statistical analysis of the measurements obtained was used to determine their repeatability and to identify maximum discrepancy values. A comparative analysis of the standard deviation values was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Sidak statistical tests. (α=.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For linear distances, the mean ±standard deviation precision was 14.71 ±12.2 µm, with a maximum discrepancy of 61 µm. For the angular measurements, the mean ±standard deviation precision was 0.072 ±0.064 degrees, with a maximum discrepancy of 0.345 degrees. Statistically significant differences (P<.05) were found among the different implant spans.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggested that the stereophotogrammetry device was sufficiently precise for recording implant locations in complete arch prostheses supported by 6 implant abutments.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.12.021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem: Stereophotogrammetry has been proposed as an alternative to intraoral scanners for recording the location of multiple dental implants. Most studies evaluating its accuracy have been in vitro, and clinical studies are lacking.

Purpose: The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the precision of a stereophotogrammetry system for complete arch prostheses supported by 6 implants.

Material and methods: A total of 10 participants with a completely edentulous maxilla with 6 multiunit implant abutments were recruited. For each participant, 5 recordings were made using a stereophotogrammetry device (PIC system; PIC dental). From the resulting standard tessellation language (STL) files, linear and angular Euclidean distances were recorded. A statistical analysis of the measurements obtained was used to determine their repeatability and to identify maximum discrepancy values. A comparative analysis of the standard deviation values was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Sidak statistical tests. (α=.05).

Results: For linear distances, the mean ±standard deviation precision was 14.71 ±12.2 µm, with a maximum discrepancy of 61 µm. For the angular measurements, the mean ±standard deviation precision was 0.072 ±0.064 degrees, with a maximum discrepancy of 0.345 degrees. Statistically significant differences (P<.05) were found among the different implant spans.

Conclusions: The results suggested that the stereophotogrammetry device was sufficiently precise for recording implant locations in complete arch prostheses supported by 6 implant abutments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全牙弓种植记录中的立体摄影测量精度:临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
期刊最新文献
The link between abutment configuration and marginal bone loss in subcrestally placed posterior implant-supported restorations. Effect of intraoral polishing on the surface property, phase change, and color stainability of monolithic zirconia. Effects of preparation design on the marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM overlay restorations: A µCT evaluation. A modified tray for making an ocular impression. Survival time and success rates of customized prefabricated metal posts: A retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1