Is the FAB test associated with fall occurrence in older adults? A retrospective analysis of outpatient fall risk assessment.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY European Geriatric Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1007/s41999-024-01134-3
Victoire Leroy, Yaohua Chen, Elisabeth Brocquet, Julien Labreuche, Cédric Gaxatte, Kelly Cotton, Jean Roche, Dominique Huvent-Grelle, François Puisieux
{"title":"Is the FAB test associated with fall occurrence in older adults? A retrospective analysis of outpatient fall risk assessment.","authors":"Victoire Leroy, Yaohua Chen, Elisabeth Brocquet, Julien Labreuche, Cédric Gaxatte, Kelly Cotton, Jean Roche, Dominique Huvent-Grelle, François Puisieux","doi":"10.1007/s41999-024-01134-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of French older adults. Participants with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 24 were recruited from a fall clinic in a geriatrics department. We recorded history of falls in the preceding 6 months, as well as Timed Up and Go test and mobility assessment at baseline and at 6- and 12-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 199 participants at baseline (mean age 83.1 years; 70.3% of females), of which 50.8% (101) had abnormal FAB scores (indicating executive impairment). Participants with executive impairment were more likely to have a history of falls. 125 and 96 participants completed 6- and 12-month follow-up visits, respectively. There was no association between abnormal FAB score at baseline and any or serious falls. Abnormal baseline FAB score was only associated with repeated (≥ 2) falls at 6 months, after adjusting for age, education, and polypharmacy (OR = 3.1 95% CI [1.0, 9.9]). Moreover, participants with abnormal FAB scores had significantly lower Timed Up and Go test scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abnormal FAB score was associated with repeated falls at 6 months, but not with total incident falls during the follow-up period. Our results highlight the potential utility of FAB in fall risk assessment, particularly for repeated falls, but further studies are needed to clarify this association.</p>","PeriodicalId":49287,"journal":{"name":"European Geriatric Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-024-01134-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of French older adults. Participants with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 24 were recruited from a fall clinic in a geriatrics department. We recorded history of falls in the preceding 6 months, as well as Timed Up and Go test and mobility assessment at baseline and at 6- and 12-month follow-up.

Results: We included 199 participants at baseline (mean age 83.1 years; 70.3% of females), of which 50.8% (101) had abnormal FAB scores (indicating executive impairment). Participants with executive impairment were more likely to have a history of falls. 125 and 96 participants completed 6- and 12-month follow-up visits, respectively. There was no association between abnormal FAB score at baseline and any or serious falls. Abnormal baseline FAB score was only associated with repeated (≥ 2) falls at 6 months, after adjusting for age, education, and polypharmacy (OR = 3.1 95% CI [1.0, 9.9]). Moreover, participants with abnormal FAB scores had significantly lower Timed Up and Go test scores.

Conclusion: Abnormal FAB score was associated with repeated falls at 6 months, but not with total incident falls during the follow-up period. Our results highlight the potential utility of FAB in fall risk assessment, particularly for repeated falls, but further studies are needed to clarify this association.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FAB 测试与老年人跌倒发生率有关吗?对门诊病人跌倒风险评估的回顾性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Geriatric Medicine
European Geriatric Medicine GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Geriatric Medicine is the official journal of the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS). Launched in 2010, this journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of Geriatric Medicine. The EUGMS is interested in the promotion of Geriatric Medicine in any setting (acute or subacute care, rehabilitation, nursing homes, primary care, fall clinics, ambulatory assessment, dementia clinics..), and also in functionality in old age, comprehensive geriatric assessment, geriatric syndromes, geriatric education, old age psychiatry, models of geriatric care in health services, and quality assurance.
期刊最新文献
The relationship between depression and cardiovascular disease in older people: results from a large-scale epidemiological cohort study in Japan. Is the FAB test associated with fall occurrence in older adults? A retrospective analysis of outpatient fall risk assessment. Moving from just measuring, to acting on frailty in specialties outside geriatrics. Adverse drug reactions and events in an Ageing PopulaTion risk Prediction (ADAPTiP) tool: the development and validation of a model for predicting adverse drug reactions and events in older patients. Association of frailty index with incidence of chronic kidney disease: China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1