Educational outcomes of care leavers and their matched peers: A gender perspective

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Child Abuse & Neglect Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107276
Netta Achdut , Rami Benbenishty , Anat Zeira
{"title":"Educational outcomes of care leavers and their matched peers: A gender perspective","authors":"Netta Achdut ,&nbsp;Rami Benbenishty ,&nbsp;Anat Zeira","doi":"10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Educational gaps between care leavers and their same-age peers not in care are well documented. However, little is known about gender disparities in educational outcomes between care leavers and their matched peers.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To examine and predict secondary school educational attainments (EA) and enrollment in postsecondary education (PSE) by (1) <em>study group:</em> care leavers versus their matched peers, (2) <em>gender:</em> men versus women, (3) <em>interaction</em> between study group and gender.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><div>Participants were alumni of educational (<em>n</em> = 21,654) and therapeutic (<em>n</em> = 3765) residential care facilities from 16 consecutive birth cohorts and same-age doubled-sized matched comparison groups (<em>n</em> = 43,308; <em>n</em> = 7530, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Bivariate analyses examined differences in secondary school EA and PSE enrollment, and multinomial and binary logistic models predicted secondary school EA and PSE enrollment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Care leavers from both residential settings showed poorer secondary school EA and lower PSE enrollment rates than their matched peers. Gaps between the study groups were far more pronounced in therapeutic facilities than in educational facilities. Women from all study groups outperformed men in both outcomes. Generally, there were greater disparities between female care leavers and their same-sex peers than between male care leavers and their same-sex peers, particularly in therapeutic settings. A complex pattern of interaction between study group and gender emerged in both residential settings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Greater efforts and resources should be allocated to promote adolescents' academic performance in both types of settings to minimize the gaps between care leavers and their matched peers and between women and men, with special attention to men in therapeutic facilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51343,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse & Neglect","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 107276"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213425000316","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Educational gaps between care leavers and their same-age peers not in care are well documented. However, little is known about gender disparities in educational outcomes between care leavers and their matched peers.

Objectives

To examine and predict secondary school educational attainments (EA) and enrollment in postsecondary education (PSE) by (1) study group: care leavers versus their matched peers, (2) gender: men versus women, (3) interaction between study group and gender.

Participants and setting

Participants were alumni of educational (n = 21,654) and therapeutic (n = 3765) residential care facilities from 16 consecutive birth cohorts and same-age doubled-sized matched comparison groups (n = 43,308; n = 7530, respectively).

Methods

Bivariate analyses examined differences in secondary school EA and PSE enrollment, and multinomial and binary logistic models predicted secondary school EA and PSE enrollment.

Results

Care leavers from both residential settings showed poorer secondary school EA and lower PSE enrollment rates than their matched peers. Gaps between the study groups were far more pronounced in therapeutic facilities than in educational facilities. Women from all study groups outperformed men in both outcomes. Generally, there were greater disparities between female care leavers and their same-sex peers than between male care leavers and their same-sex peers, particularly in therapeutic settings. A complex pattern of interaction between study group and gender emerged in both residential settings.

Conclusions

Greater efforts and resources should be allocated to promote adolescents' academic performance in both types of settings to minimize the gaps between care leavers and their matched peers and between women and men, with special attention to men in therapeutic facilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
照顾者及其匹配同伴的教育成果:性别视角。
背景:护理离开者与未接受护理的同龄同伴之间的教育差距有充分的记录。然而,人们对照顾者和与其相匹配的同龄人之间教育成果的性别差异知之甚少。目的:通过(1)研究组:护理离开者与与其匹配的同伴;(2)性别:男性与女性;(3)研究组与性别之间的相互作用来检验和预测中学教育程度(EA)和中学后教育入学率(PSE)。参与者和环境:参与者是来自16个连续出生队列和相同年龄的双大小匹配对照组的教育(n = 21,654)和治疗(n = 3765)寄宿护理机构的校友(n = 43,308;N = 7530)。方法:采用双变量分析检验中学EA和PSE入学率的差异,并采用多项和二元logistic模型预测中学EA和PSE入学率。结果:两种寄宿环境下的护理离开者的中学教育水平较差,PSE入学率较低。研究小组之间的差距在治疗机构比在教育机构要明显得多。所有研究组的女性在这两方面的表现都优于男性。一般来说,女性离职护理人员与其同性同伴之间的差异大于男性离职护理人员与其同性同伴之间的差异,特别是在治疗环境中。在两种居住环境中,研究组和性别之间出现了复杂的互动模式。结论:应投入更多的努力和资源来促进这两种环境中的青少年的学业成绩,以尽量减少护理人员与其匹配同伴之间以及女性与男性之间的差距,并特别关注治疗机构中的男性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.40%
发文量
397
期刊介绍: Official Publication of the International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect The International Journal, provides an international, multidisciplinary forum on all aspects of child abuse and neglect, with special emphasis on prevention and treatment; the scope extends further to all those aspects of life which either favor or hinder child development. While contributions will primarily be from the fields of psychology, psychiatry, social work, medicine, nursing, law enforcement, legislature, education, and anthropology, the Journal encourages the concerned lay individual and child-oriented advocate organizations to contribute.
期刊最新文献
“I had no safe space.” Painful childhood experiences in the lives of men who are suicidal: A qualitative thematic analysis An intervention addressing secondary traumatic stress during a child abuse pediatrics rotation for residents: A qualitative study Childhood trauma assessed using the childhood trauma questionnaire and its influence on pediatric mood disorders and self-harm: a systematic review and meta-analysis Childhood sexual abuse and bullying victimization: National, regional and global trend analysis from global burden of disease data 1990–2021 Sextortion and suicide: Implications for adolescent image-based abuse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1