Effects of BuzzyⓇ and ShotBlockerⓇ on Pain and Anxiety During Immunization in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pain Management Nursing Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2024.12.023
Dilek Sari RN, PhD , Hatice Erdem Onder RN, PhD , Nihal Taskiran RN, PhD , Figen Yardimci RN, PhD , Seyma Kislali Tas RN
{"title":"Effects of BuzzyⓇ and ShotBlockerⓇ on Pain and Anxiety During Immunization in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Dilek Sari RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Hatice Erdem Onder RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Nihal Taskiran RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Figen Yardimci RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Seyma Kislali Tas RN","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.12.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Childhood vaccines are a vital procedure for preventing infectious diseases and are a regular component of a child's medical care. However, vaccines are among the first and most frequently encountered painful procedures that can cause indicators of anxiety in relation to immunizations. This study aimed to identify and assess the impact of the ShotBlocker<sup>Ⓡ</sup> and Buzzy<sup>Ⓡ</sup> approaches on pain, anxiety and satisfaction with the tetanus-diphtheria vaccine in school-aged children.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>An experimental randomized controlled trial.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study included a sample of 138 children aged 13-years-old receiving the tetanus-diphtheria vaccine at a family health clinic. Participants were randomly assigned to the ShotBlocker<sup>Ⓡ</sup>, Buzzy<sup>Ⓡ</sup> and control groups. Each group consisted of 46 children, with an equal distribution of 23 females and 23 males. Data were collected using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (state version) and Visual Analog Scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The ShotBlocker<sup>Ⓡ</sup> and Buzzy<sup>Ⓡ</sup> groups exhibited lower pain and anxiety scores than the control group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between groups (for pain, <em>p</em> = .135; for anxiety, <em>p</em> = .276). It was found though that there was a statistically significant difference between the mean anxiety scores of groups before and after vaccination <strong>(<em>p</em> &lt; .001).</strong> Following vaccination, although the satisfaction scores of children in the ShotBlocker<sup>Ⓡ</sup> and Buzzy<sup>Ⓡ</sup> groups were higher, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (<em>p</em> = .245).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The use of Buzzy<sup>Ⓡ</sup> and ShotBlocker<sup>Ⓡ</sup> has been demonstrated to be beneficial in reducing the pain and anxiety associated with tetanus-diphtheria vaccine injections in 13-year-old children. Furthermore, these methods can be employed frequently during vaccination to enhance children's satisfaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":"26 4","pages":"Pages e325-e331"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904224003369","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Childhood vaccines are a vital procedure for preventing infectious diseases and are a regular component of a child's medical care. However, vaccines are among the first and most frequently encountered painful procedures that can cause indicators of anxiety in relation to immunizations. This study aimed to identify and assess the impact of the ShotBlocker and Buzzy approaches on pain, anxiety and satisfaction with the tetanus-diphtheria vaccine in school-aged children.

Design

An experimental randomized controlled trial.

Methods

The study included a sample of 138 children aged 13-years-old receiving the tetanus-diphtheria vaccine at a family health clinic. Participants were randomly assigned to the ShotBlocker, Buzzy and control groups. Each group consisted of 46 children, with an equal distribution of 23 females and 23 males. Data were collected using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (state version) and Visual Analog Scale.

Results

The ShotBlocker and Buzzy groups exhibited lower pain and anxiety scores than the control group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between groups (for pain, p = .135; for anxiety, p = .276). It was found though that there was a statistically significant difference between the mean anxiety scores of groups before and after vaccination (p < .001). Following vaccination, although the satisfaction scores of children in the ShotBlocker and Buzzy groups were higher, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = .245).

Conclusions

The use of Buzzy and ShotBlocker has been demonstrated to be beneficial in reducing the pain and anxiety associated with tetanus-diphtheria vaccine injections in 13-year-old children. Furthermore, these methods can be employed frequently during vaccination to enhance children's satisfaction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BuzzyⓇ和ShotBlockerⓇ对儿童免疫接种期间疼痛和焦虑的影响:一项随机对照试验。
目的:儿童疫苗是预防传染病的重要程序,是儿童医疗保健的常规组成部分。然而,接种疫苗是第一个也是最经常遇到的痛苦程序之一,可能导致与免疫接种有关的焦虑指标。本研究旨在确定和评估ShotBlockerⓇ和BuzzyⓇ方法对学龄儿童接种破伤风-白喉疫苗的疼痛、焦虑和满意度的影响。设计:实验性随机对照试验。方法:该研究包括138名13岁儿童样本,在家庭保健诊所接受破伤风-白喉疫苗。参与者被随机分配到ShotBlockerⓇ,BuzzyⓇ和对照组。每组由46名儿童组成,平均分布为23名女性和23名男性。使用状态-特质焦虑量表(状态版)和视觉模拟量表收集数据。结果:ShotBlockerⓇ和BuzzyⓇ组的疼痛和焦虑评分低于对照组。但两组间差异无统计学意义(疼痛方面,p = .135;对于焦虑,p = .276)。但接种前后各组平均焦虑评分差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。接种疫苗后,虽然ShotBlockerⓇ组和BuzzyⓇ组儿童满意度得分较高,但组间差异无统计学意义(p = .245)。结论:使用BuzzyⓇ和ShotBlockerⓇ已被证明有利于减少13岁儿童注射破伤风-白喉疫苗相关的疼痛和焦虑。此外,这些方法可以在疫苗接种过程中经常使用,以提高儿童的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Table of contents Neuropathic Pain Experience and Self-Management Strategies of Spinal Cord Injury Patients: A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies Managing Allodynia in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: An Integrated Rehabilitation Approach A Randomized Trial of Cervical Stabilization Exercise Training Via Telerehabilitation for Migraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1