Effects of Buzzy and ShotBlocker on Pain and Anxiety During Immunization in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pain Management Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2024.12.023
Dilek Sari, Hatice Erdem Onder, Nihal Taskiran, Figen Yardimci, Seyma Kislali Tas
{"title":"Effects of Buzzy<sup>Ⓡ</sup> and ShotBlocker<sup>Ⓡ</sup> on Pain and Anxiety During Immunization in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Dilek Sari, Hatice Erdem Onder, Nihal Taskiran, Figen Yardimci, Seyma Kislali Tas","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.12.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Childhood vaccines are a vital procedure for preventing infectious diseases and are a regular component of a child's medical care. However, vaccines are among the first and most frequently encountered painful procedures that can cause indicators of anxiety in relation to immunizations. This study aimed to identify and assess the impact of the ShotBlocker<sup>Ⓡ</sup> and Buzzy<sup>Ⓡ</sup> approaches on pain, anxiety and satisfaction with the tetanus-diphtheria vaccine in school-aged children.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An experimental randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included a sample of 138 children aged 13-years-old receiving the tetanus-diphtheria vaccine at a family health clinic. Participants were randomly assigned to the ShotBlocker<sup>Ⓡ</sup>, Buzzy<sup>Ⓡ</sup> and control groups. Each group consisted of 46 children, with an equal distribution of 23 females and 23 males. Data were collected using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (state version) and Visual Analog Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ShotBlocker<sup>Ⓡ</sup> and Buzzy<sup>Ⓡ</sup> groups exhibited lower pain and anxiety scores than the control group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between groups (for pain, p = .135; for anxiety, p = .276). It was found though that there was a statistically significant difference between the mean anxiety scores of groups before and after vaccination (p < .001). Following vaccination, although the satisfaction scores of children in the ShotBlocker<sup>Ⓡ</sup> and Buzzy<sup>Ⓡ</sup> groups were higher, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = .245).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of Buzzy<sup>Ⓡ</sup> and ShotBlocker<sup>Ⓡ</sup> has been demonstrated to be beneficial in reducing the pain and anxiety associated with tetanus-diphtheria vaccine injections in 13-year-old children. Furthermore, these methods can be employed frequently during vaccination to enhance children's satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.12.023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Childhood vaccines are a vital procedure for preventing infectious diseases and are a regular component of a child's medical care. However, vaccines are among the first and most frequently encountered painful procedures that can cause indicators of anxiety in relation to immunizations. This study aimed to identify and assess the impact of the ShotBlocker and Buzzy approaches on pain, anxiety and satisfaction with the tetanus-diphtheria vaccine in school-aged children.

Design: An experimental randomized controlled trial.

Methods: The study included a sample of 138 children aged 13-years-old receiving the tetanus-diphtheria vaccine at a family health clinic. Participants were randomly assigned to the ShotBlocker, Buzzy and control groups. Each group consisted of 46 children, with an equal distribution of 23 females and 23 males. Data were collected using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (state version) and Visual Analog Scale.

Results: The ShotBlocker and Buzzy groups exhibited lower pain and anxiety scores than the control group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between groups (for pain, p = .135; for anxiety, p = .276). It was found though that there was a statistically significant difference between the mean anxiety scores of groups before and after vaccination (p < .001). Following vaccination, although the satisfaction scores of children in the ShotBlocker and Buzzy groups were higher, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = .245).

Conclusions: The use of Buzzy and ShotBlocker has been demonstrated to be beneficial in reducing the pain and anxiety associated with tetanus-diphtheria vaccine injections in 13-year-old children. Furthermore, these methods can be employed frequently during vaccination to enhance children's satisfaction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
期刊最新文献
Collaborative Tele-Pain and Substance Use Disorder Care for Patients in a Rural Setting: Results of a Single-Arm Open-Label Pilot Trial. Effects of Repeated Feedback on Pain Documentation: A Cluster Randomized Trial. Postcompetency Index System for Assessing Pain Resource Nurses' Competence: A Delphi Study. Nursing Care of the Patient With Epidural Analgesia. Scoping Review: A Hybrid Delivery Model of Pain Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1