The effects of unconditional cash transfers on child abuse and neglect in early childhood: Evidence from New Zealand

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Child Abuse & Neglect Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107260
Sophie Moullin, Barry Milne
{"title":"The effects of unconditional cash transfers on child abuse and neglect in early childhood: Evidence from New Zealand","authors":"Sophie Moullin,&nbsp;Barry Milne","doi":"10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Child abuse and neglect is recorded at higher rates in families with low incomes, and in contexts with lower public spending on families. However, it is not clear whether modest cash transfers could reduce rates.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To estimate the effects of unconditional cash transfers to mothers with children under 3 years of age on child abuse and neglect.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and participants</h3><div>In 2018, New Zealand - an ethnically diverse rich democracy with above average child poverty - introduced a “Families Package” of largely unconditional cash transfers for mothers of children aged 0–3. The majority of the package comprised a universal payment for children aged 0–1 of NZ$60 (US$37) a week, and a payment of up to that amount for families in all but the top third of incomes for children aged 1–3. Mothers chose whether to receive payments weekly, monthly or annually. We use administrative data for all children born in New Zealand between 2013 and 2019 (<em>N</em> = 172,170).</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Difference-in-difference estimation compared the difference in child abuse and neglect for 3-year-olds born before and after the introduction of the Families Package in July 2018, with the differences between the same birth month periods for children born in the previous 3 years.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Families Package reduced the odds of child protective services' referrals to family services in non-urgent cases of suspected maltreatment by 19 % overall (OR: 0.81, CI: 0.80–0.81, <em>p</em> = 0.003). The reduction was 26 % (OR: 0.74, CI: 0.61–0.91, p = 0.003) both for Māori, the indigenous people of New Zealand, and for those for whom child protective services had a record of concern for older siblings. The Families Package also reduced substantiated cases of neglect in single mother families (OR 0.6, CI 0.38–0.93, <em>p</em> = 0.022). There were no significant effects on urgent cases, substantiations of physical or emotional abuse, or hospitalizations for traumatic brain injuries.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Small unconditional cash transfers in early childhood can lead to meaningful reductions in non-acute cases of suspected child abuse and neglect among at-risk groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51343,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse & Neglect","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 107260"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213425000158","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Child abuse and neglect is recorded at higher rates in families with low incomes, and in contexts with lower public spending on families. However, it is not clear whether modest cash transfers could reduce rates.

Objective

To estimate the effects of unconditional cash transfers to mothers with children under 3 years of age on child abuse and neglect.

Setting and participants

In 2018, New Zealand - an ethnically diverse rich democracy with above average child poverty - introduced a “Families Package” of largely unconditional cash transfers for mothers of children aged 0–3. The majority of the package comprised a universal payment for children aged 0–1 of NZ$60 (US$37) a week, and a payment of up to that amount for families in all but the top third of incomes for children aged 1–3. Mothers chose whether to receive payments weekly, monthly or annually. We use administrative data for all children born in New Zealand between 2013 and 2019 (N = 172,170).

Method

Difference-in-difference estimation compared the difference in child abuse and neglect for 3-year-olds born before and after the introduction of the Families Package in July 2018, with the differences between the same birth month periods for children born in the previous 3 years.

Results

The Families Package reduced the odds of child protective services' referrals to family services in non-urgent cases of suspected maltreatment by 19 % overall (OR: 0.81, CI: 0.80–0.81, p = 0.003). The reduction was 26 % (OR: 0.74, CI: 0.61–0.91, p = 0.003) both for Māori, the indigenous people of New Zealand, and for those for whom child protective services had a record of concern for older siblings. The Families Package also reduced substantiated cases of neglect in single mother families (OR 0.6, CI 0.38–0.93, p = 0.022). There were no significant effects on urgent cases, substantiations of physical or emotional abuse, or hospitalizations for traumatic brain injuries.

Conclusions

Small unconditional cash transfers in early childhood can lead to meaningful reductions in non-acute cases of suspected child abuse and neglect among at-risk groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无条件现金转移对儿童早期虐待和忽视的影响:来自新西兰的证据。
背景:在低收入家庭和公共支出较低的家庭中,虐待和忽视儿童的比例较高。然而,目前尚不清楚适度的现金转移是否能降低利率。目的:评估无条件现金转移对3岁以下儿童母亲虐待和忽视儿童的影响。背景和参与者:2018年,新西兰——一个种族多元化的富裕民主国家,儿童贫困率高于平均水平——推出了“家庭一揽子计划”,为0-3岁儿童的母亲提供基本无条件的现金转移支付。该计划的大部分内容包括,0-1岁儿童每周普遍获得60新西兰元(37美元)的补贴,1-3岁儿童的家庭除了收入最高的三分之一外,其他所有家庭的补贴都高达60新西兰元(37美元)。母亲们可以选择每周、每月还是每年领取工资。我们使用了2013年至2019年在新西兰出生的所有儿童的行政数据(N = 172170)。方法:采用异差法比较2018年7月家庭套餐推出前后出生的3岁儿童虐待和忽视儿童的差异,以及前3年出生的儿童相同出生月份期间的差异。结果:在疑似虐待的非紧急病例中,家庭一揽子计划将儿童保护服务转介给家庭服务的几率降低了19% (OR: 0.81, CI: 0.80-0.81, p = 0.003)。对于Māori,新西兰土著居民,以及那些儿童保护服务有对哥哥姐姐的关注记录的人来说,减少了26% (OR: 0.74, CI: 0.61-0.91, p = 0.003)。家庭一揽子计划也减少了单亲母亲家庭中被忽视的案例(OR 0.6, CI 0.38-0.93, p = 0.022)。对紧急病例、身体或精神虐待的证据或因创伤性脑损伤住院治疗没有显著影响。结论:儿童早期的小额无条件现金转移可以显著减少风险群体中疑似儿童虐待和忽视的非急性病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.40%
发文量
397
期刊介绍: Official Publication of the International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect The International Journal, provides an international, multidisciplinary forum on all aspects of child abuse and neglect, with special emphasis on prevention and treatment; the scope extends further to all those aspects of life which either favor or hinder child development. While contributions will primarily be from the fields of psychology, psychiatry, social work, medicine, nursing, law enforcement, legislature, education, and anthropology, the Journal encourages the concerned lay individual and child-oriented advocate organizations to contribute.
期刊最新文献
An intervention addressing secondary traumatic stress during a child abuse pediatrics rotation for residents: A qualitative study Childhood trauma assessed using the childhood trauma questionnaire and its influence on pediatric mood disorders and self-harm: a systematic review and meta-analysis Childhood sexual abuse and bullying victimization: National, regional and global trend analysis from global burden of disease data 1990–2021 Sextortion and suicide: Implications for adolescent image-based abuse Determinants of PTSD symptom severity in child victims of violence in southern Algeria: A forensic cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1