Characterizing the relationship between personality dimensions and psychosis-specific clinical characteristics

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Schizophrenia Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.schres.2025.01.002
Youjin Jenny Jang , Walid Yassin , Raquelle Mesholam-Gately , Elliot S. Gershon , Sarah Keedy , Godfrey G. Pearlson , Carol A. Tamminga , Jennifer McDowell , David A. Parker , Kodiak Sauer , Matcheri S. Keshavan
{"title":"Characterizing the relationship between personality dimensions and psychosis-specific clinical characteristics","authors":"Youjin Jenny Jang ,&nbsp;Walid Yassin ,&nbsp;Raquelle Mesholam-Gately ,&nbsp;Elliot S. Gershon ,&nbsp;Sarah Keedy ,&nbsp;Godfrey G. Pearlson ,&nbsp;Carol A. Tamminga ,&nbsp;Jennifer McDowell ,&nbsp;David A. Parker ,&nbsp;Kodiak Sauer ,&nbsp;Matcheri S. Keshavan","doi":"10.1016/j.schres.2025.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Past studies associating personality with psychosis have been limited by small nonclinical samples and a focus on general symptom burden. This study uses a large clinical sample to examine personality's relationship with psychosis-specific features and compare personality dimensions across clinically and neurobiologically defined categories of psychoses.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 1352 participants with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar with psychosis, as well as 623 healthy controls (HC), drawn from the Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network for Intermediate Phenotypes (BSNIP-2) study, were included. Three biomarker-derived biotypes were used to separately categorize the probands. Mean personality factors (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism) were compared between HC and proband subgroups using a generalized linear model. A robust linear regression was utilized to determine personality differences across biotypes and diagnostic subgroups. Associations between personality factors and cognition were determined through Pearson's correlation. A canonical correlation was run between the personality factors and general functioning, positive symptoms, and negative symptoms to delineate the relationship between personality and clinical outcomes of psychosis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were significant personality differences between the proband and HC groups across all five personality factors. Overall, the probands had higher neuroticism and lower extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness. Openness showed the greatest difference across the diagnostic subgroups and biotypes, and greatest correlation with cognition. Openness, agreeableness, and extraversion had the strongest associations with symptom severity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Individuals with psychotic disorders have different personality traits compared to HC. In particular, openness may be relevant in distinguishing psychosis-specific phenotypes and experiences, and associated with biological underpinnings of psychosis, including cognition. Further studies should identify potential causal factors and mediators of this relationship.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21417,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research","volume":"276 ","pages":"Pages 88-96"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920996425000027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Past studies associating personality with psychosis have been limited by small nonclinical samples and a focus on general symptom burden. This study uses a large clinical sample to examine personality's relationship with psychosis-specific features and compare personality dimensions across clinically and neurobiologically defined categories of psychoses.

Methods

A total of 1352 participants with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar with psychosis, as well as 623 healthy controls (HC), drawn from the Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network for Intermediate Phenotypes (BSNIP-2) study, were included. Three biomarker-derived biotypes were used to separately categorize the probands. Mean personality factors (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism) were compared between HC and proband subgroups using a generalized linear model. A robust linear regression was utilized to determine personality differences across biotypes and diagnostic subgroups. Associations between personality factors and cognition were determined through Pearson's correlation. A canonical correlation was run between the personality factors and general functioning, positive symptoms, and negative symptoms to delineate the relationship between personality and clinical outcomes of psychosis.

Results

There were significant personality differences between the proband and HC groups across all five personality factors. Overall, the probands had higher neuroticism and lower extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness. Openness showed the greatest difference across the diagnostic subgroups and biotypes, and greatest correlation with cognition. Openness, agreeableness, and extraversion had the strongest associations with symptom severity.

Conclusions

Individuals with psychotic disorders have different personality traits compared to HC. In particular, openness may be relevant in distinguishing psychosis-specific phenotypes and experiences, and associated with biological underpinnings of psychosis, including cognition. Further studies should identify potential causal factors and mediators of this relationship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
表征人格维度与精神病特异性临床特征之间的关系。
背景:过去将人格与精神病联系起来的研究受限于小的非临床样本和关注一般症状负担。本研究使用大量临床样本来检查人格与精神病特定特征的关系,并比较临床和神经生物学定义的精神病类别的人格维度。方法:共纳入来自双相-精神分裂症中间表型网络(bsnip2)研究的1352名精神分裂症、分裂情感性障碍和双相双相精神病患者,以及623名健康对照(HC)。使用三种生物标志物衍生的生物型分别对先证物进行分类。采用广义线性模型比较HC和先证者亚组的平均人格因素(开放性、严谨性、外向性、宜人性和神经质)。采用稳健的线性回归来确定生物型和诊断亚组之间的人格差异。人格因素与认知之间的关系通过Pearson相关来确定。人格因素与一般功能、阳性症状和阴性症状之间存在典型相关,以描述人格与精神病临床结果之间的关系。结果:先证者与HC组在5个人格因素上均存在显著差异。总体而言,先证者具有较高的神经质和较低的外向性、宜人性、尽责性和开放性。开放性在诊断亚组和生物型之间的差异最大,与认知的相关性最大。开放性、宜人性和外向性与症状严重程度的关系最为密切。结论:精神障碍患者与HC患者具有不同的人格特征。特别是,开放性可能与区分精神病特异性表型和经历有关,并与精神病的生物学基础相关,包括认知。进一步的研究应该确定这种关系的潜在因果因素和中介。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Schizophrenia Research
Schizophrenia Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
8.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
10.2 weeks
期刊介绍: As official journal of the Schizophrenia International Research Society (SIRS) Schizophrenia Research is THE journal of choice for international researchers and clinicians to share their work with the global schizophrenia research community. More than 6000 institutes have online or print (or both) access to this journal - the largest specialist journal in the field, with the largest readership! Schizophrenia Research''s time to first decision is as fast as 6 weeks and its publishing speed is as fast as 4 weeks until online publication (corrected proof/Article in Press) after acceptance and 14 weeks from acceptance until publication in a printed issue. The journal publishes novel papers that really contribute to understanding the biology and treatment of schizophrenic disorders; Schizophrenia Research brings together biological, clinical and psychological research in order to stimulate the synthesis of findings from all disciplines involved in improving patient outcomes in schizophrenia.
期刊最新文献
Factor analysis of two COMPASS psychopathology symptom scales for first-episode psychosis Associations between characteristics of emotional mental imagery and auditory verbal hallucinations in individuals with psychosis spectrum disorders Task-based fNIRS biomarkers of HD-tDCS treatment for negative symptoms in schizophrenia Beyond the emotion paradox: Avenues to understanding anhedonia in schizophrenia Impaired intrinsic motivation in psychosis risk relates to ventral striatum activation to self-generated reinforcement signals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1