Why do most people on dialysis not accept psychological care to increase perceptions of control in life?

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL British Journal of Health Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1111/bjhp.12782
Alicia M. de Vries, Adelita V. Ranchor, Ralf Westerhuis, Annemieke Visser, Casper F. M. Franssen, Gerjan J. Navis, Maya J. Schroevers
{"title":"Why do most people on dialysis not accept psychological care to increase perceptions of control in life?","authors":"Alicia M. de Vries,&nbsp;Adelita V. Ranchor,&nbsp;Ralf Westerhuis,&nbsp;Annemieke Visser,&nbsp;Casper F. M. Franssen,&nbsp;Gerjan J. Navis,&nbsp;Maya J. Schroevers","doi":"10.1111/bjhp.12782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>People with chronic kidney failure (CKF) on dialysis who perceive little control in life are at risk for a reduced well-being. We developed and tested an intervention aiming to enhance their perceptions of control. To gain insight into patients' care needs and acceptance of the intervention, we examined the prevalence of patients perceiving low control, their characteristics, and their reasons for (not) accepting the intervention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>We consecutively screened 430 people on dialysis on perceived control, with those reporting low control offered to participate in the intervention study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used data of a Randomized Controlled Trial examining the feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of the intervention. Perceived control was assessed with the Pearlin Mastery scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>About half (55%) of the sample perceived low control, particularly those with more comorbidities. Most persons eligible for receiving the intervention did not accept the intervention (89%), especially older persons. Main reasons were experiencing little burden of perceiving low control as well as no need for care to increase perceived control.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>A significant number of people on dialysis perceived low control in life, yet very few accepted an intervention for regaining a sense of control. In-depth qualitative research is needed for a more comprehensive understanding of the personal experience and perceived impact of low control on health and well-being, activities and relationships as well as people's reasons and needs for enhancing a sense of control and attitude towards psychological interventions aiming to enhance perceived control.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48161,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Psychology","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12782","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

People with chronic kidney failure (CKF) on dialysis who perceive little control in life are at risk for a reduced well-being. We developed and tested an intervention aiming to enhance their perceptions of control. To gain insight into patients' care needs and acceptance of the intervention, we examined the prevalence of patients perceiving low control, their characteristics, and their reasons for (not) accepting the intervention.

Design

We consecutively screened 430 people on dialysis on perceived control, with those reporting low control offered to participate in the intervention study.

Methods

We used data of a Randomized Controlled Trial examining the feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of the intervention. Perceived control was assessed with the Pearlin Mastery scale.

Results

About half (55%) of the sample perceived low control, particularly those with more comorbidities. Most persons eligible for receiving the intervention did not accept the intervention (89%), especially older persons. Main reasons were experiencing little burden of perceiving low control as well as no need for care to increase perceived control.

Conclusions

A significant number of people on dialysis perceived low control in life, yet very few accepted an intervention for regaining a sense of control. In-depth qualitative research is needed for a more comprehensive understanding of the personal experience and perceived impact of low control on health and well-being, activities and relationships as well as people's reasons and needs for enhancing a sense of control and attitude towards psychological interventions aiming to enhance perceived control.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Health Psychology
British Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The focus of the British Journal of Health Psychology is to publish original research on various aspects of psychology that are related to health, health-related behavior, and illness throughout a person's life. The journal specifically seeks articles that are based on health psychology theory or discuss theoretical matters within the field.
期刊最新文献
Explaining the self-regulatory role of affect in identity theory: The role of self-compassion Why do most people on dialysis not accept psychological care to increase perceptions of control in life? The association between depressive symptoms and lower urinary tract symptoms and impact among women: Investigating behavioural, cognitive and physiological pathways Associations between lifestyle and well-being in early and late pregnancy in women with overweight or obesity: Secondary analyses of the PEARS RCT Implementation of a national programme to train and support healthcare professionals in brief behavioural interventions: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1