Optimizing health system volume flexibility: key determinants and strategies during the COVID-19 crisis.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Health Organization and Management Pub Date : 2025-10-13 DOI:10.1108/JHOM-08-2023-0249
Seongwon Choi, Thomas Powers
{"title":"Optimizing health system volume flexibility: key determinants and strategies during the COVID-19 crisis.","authors":"Seongwon Choi, Thomas Powers","doi":"10.1108/JHOM-08-2023-0249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The need to match highly variable demand for healthcare services with existing capacity has been a significant health system challenge experienced by the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite mounting research on various COVID-19 responses in the recent literature, there has not been a structured review examining key determinants of health system volume flexibility. The focus of the present research is to review recent literature based on a conceptual framework developed based on the volume flexibility literature on COVID-19. The review also provides a meaningful way to guide practice and future research in the area.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>A literature review was performed guided by the theoretical frameworks developed in the previous volume of flexibility literature. Selected research papers were reviewed and analyzed to identify key determinants of health system volume flexibility.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Seven determinants of health system volume flexibility under three domains (demand management, capacity management, and performance) included demand management strategies, integration, capacity management strategies, workforce management, technology, quality of disease outcomes, and health system knowledge.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>The research provides both health systems researchers as well as practitioners with a foundational conceptual framework and knowledge related to health system volume flexibility. In addition, this research identifies future research areas to expand knowledge relevant to health system volume flexibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":47447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","volume":" ","pages":"1065-1086"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-08-2023-0249","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The need to match highly variable demand for healthcare services with existing capacity has been a significant health system challenge experienced by the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite mounting research on various COVID-19 responses in the recent literature, there has not been a structured review examining key determinants of health system volume flexibility. The focus of the present research is to review recent literature based on a conceptual framework developed based on the volume flexibility literature on COVID-19. The review also provides a meaningful way to guide practice and future research in the area.

Design/methodology/approach: A literature review was performed guided by the theoretical frameworks developed in the previous volume of flexibility literature. Selected research papers were reviewed and analyzed to identify key determinants of health system volume flexibility.

Findings: Seven determinants of health system volume flexibility under three domains (demand management, capacity management, and performance) included demand management strategies, integration, capacity management strategies, workforce management, technology, quality of disease outcomes, and health system knowledge.

Originality/value: The research provides both health systems researchers as well as practitioners with a foundational conceptual framework and knowledge related to health system volume flexibility. In addition, this research identifies future research areas to expand knowledge relevant to health system volume flexibility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化卫生系统容量灵活性:COVID-19危机期间的关键决定因素和战略。
目的:将高度可变的医疗服务需求与现有能力相匹配,是2019冠状病毒病大流行期间卫生系统面临的一项重大挑战。尽管最近的文献中对各种COVID-19应对措施进行了越来越多的研究,但尚未对卫生系统容量灵活性的关键决定因素进行结构化审查。本研究的重点是基于基于COVID-19的体积灵活性文献开发的概念框架来回顾最近的文献。本文也为指导该领域的实践和未来的研究提供了有意义的途径。设计/方法论/方法:在前一卷灵活性文献中发展的理论框架的指导下进行了文献综述。对选定的研究论文进行了审查和分析,以确定卫生系统体积灵活性的关键决定因素。研究结果:在三个领域(需求管理、能力管理和绩效)下,卫生系统容量灵活性的七个决定因素包括需求管理策略、整合、能力管理策略、劳动力管理、技术、疾病结局质量和卫生系统知识。原创性/价值:该研究为卫生系统研究人员和从业人员提供了与卫生系统体积灵活性相关的基本概念框架和知识。此外,本研究确定了未来的研究领域,以扩大与卫生系统体积灵活性相关的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: ■International health and international organizations ■Organisational behaviour, governance, management and leadership ■The inter-relationship of health and public sector services ■Theories and practices of management and leadership in health and related organizations ■Emotion in health care organizations ■Management education and training ■Industrial relations and human resource theory and management. As the demands on the health care industry both polarize and intensify, effective management of financial and human resources, the restructuring of organizations and the handling of market forces are increasingly important areas for the industry to address.
期刊最新文献
Digital transformation, strategy execution and operational efficiency in Uganda's medical facilities. Healthcare presence or barely there? Unpacking the systemic challenges to the right to health in Nigeria: a scoping review. The effects of environmental turbulence on health-care alliance formation in Taiwan: a multi-level model. Examining the impact of sustainable leadership on employee subjective well-being: a mediated moderation model involving compassion and burnout. Assessing Industry 4.0 adoption impact on healthcare performance using SEM-NCA with mediators: usefulness, ease of use, trust and usage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1