From the backroom to the boardroom: Health care chief information officers, stereotypes, and strategic leadership in the digital transformation era.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Care Management Review Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1097/HMR.0000000000000436
Michele L Heath, Geoffrey A Silvera, Tracy H Porter
{"title":"From the backroom to the boardroom: Health care chief information officers, stereotypes, and strategic leadership in the digital transformation era.","authors":"Michele L Heath, Geoffrey A Silvera, Tracy H Porter","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Issue: </strong>The digital transformation of the U.S. health care system is underway, but the role of health care chief information officers (HCIOs) in that transformation has been unclear. As the landscape of health care technology continues to expand, there is an increasing need to understand the influence of HCIOs, who are in a unique position to impact key strategic decisions. We seek to demonstrate the strategic importance of HCIOs in meeting the needs of digital transformation, by managing the emergence and strategic implementation of health care technologies to benefit health care organization performance. We also propose that profession-based stereotypes inhibit HCIOs as they may be viewed as behind-the-scenes technicians rather than strategic leaders.</p><p><strong>Critical theoretical analysis: </strong>Upper echelons (UE) theory demonstrates how HCIOs' unique perspectives gained through education, experience, and the strategic decision-making process also can influence organizational performance. We build on UE to conceptualize the degree to which profession-based stereotypes moderate the decision-making of top management teams).</p><p><strong>Theoretical implications: </strong>We present two theoretical contributions. First, we introduce a profession-based stereotype moderated model of UE specific to HCIOs. Second, we offer an analysis of the role of HCIOs as strategic leaders in the digital transformation era.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>We call upon health care scholars and practitioners to examine HCIOs' influence and their roles in health care organization decision-making, top management team interactions, and organizational outcomes as the digital transformation in health care continues.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000436","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Issue: The digital transformation of the U.S. health care system is underway, but the role of health care chief information officers (HCIOs) in that transformation has been unclear. As the landscape of health care technology continues to expand, there is an increasing need to understand the influence of HCIOs, who are in a unique position to impact key strategic decisions. We seek to demonstrate the strategic importance of HCIOs in meeting the needs of digital transformation, by managing the emergence and strategic implementation of health care technologies to benefit health care organization performance. We also propose that profession-based stereotypes inhibit HCIOs as they may be viewed as behind-the-scenes technicians rather than strategic leaders.

Critical theoretical analysis: Upper echelons (UE) theory demonstrates how HCIOs' unique perspectives gained through education, experience, and the strategic decision-making process also can influence organizational performance. We build on UE to conceptualize the degree to which profession-based stereotypes moderate the decision-making of top management teams).

Theoretical implications: We present two theoretical contributions. First, we introduce a profession-based stereotype moderated model of UE specific to HCIOs. Second, we offer an analysis of the role of HCIOs as strategic leaders in the digital transformation era.

Practice implications: We call upon health care scholars and practitioners to examine HCIOs' influence and their roles in health care organization decision-making, top management team interactions, and organizational outcomes as the digital transformation in health care continues.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Care Management Review
Health Care Management Review HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Health Care Management Review (HCMR) disseminates state-of-the-art knowledge about management, leadership, and administration of health care systems, organizations, and agencies. Multidisciplinary and international in scope, articles present completed research relevant to health care management, leadership, and administration, as well report on rigorous evaluations of health care management innovations, or provide a synthesis of prior research that results in evidence-based health care management practice recommendations. Articles are theory-driven and translate findings into implications and recommendations for health care administrators, researchers, and faculty.
期刊最新文献
Relating digitalization and quality management in health care organizations: A systematic review. From the backroom to the boardroom: Health care chief information officers, stereotypes, and strategic leadership in the digital transformation era. Need of the hour: A service failure recovery reorientation for U.S. hospitals. The complementary effects of formal and informal budgetary performance feedback on doctor-managers' responsibilities. Exploring performance profiles of home health care agencies: A two-stage analytical approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1