The Effect of Cognitive-Motor Dual Tasks on the Risk of Falls in Female Saudi Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-01-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S500767
Salem F Alatawi, Hayam M Mahmoud
{"title":"The Effect of Cognitive-Motor Dual Tasks on the Risk of Falls in Female Saudi Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Salem F Alatawi, Hayam M Mahmoud","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S500767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dual tasking (DT) requires individuals to carry out two actions simultaneously, comparable to how the brain can perform a cognitive function while the body is in motion, which eventually enhances human balance. This paper aims to examine and compare the impact of DT on the risk of falling (ROF) among Saudi female students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional design was used. 120 female students were recruited and divided into two groups: literary group (LG) (n = 34) and scientific group (SG) (n = 86). Participants, aged 18-25, had a normal body mass index (BMI) and cognitive and balancing skills. ROF was measured using the Biodex balancing device for balance alone (no DT) and with DT (motor and two cognitive tasks). After three trials, the mean and average were calculated. The ICC calculation showed a reliable result of <0.8. BMI was represented as the mean (M) and standard deviation (SD) for both groups. ROF was compared within and between groups using paired and unpaired T-tests. Mann-Whitney compared the two groups throughout DT. The level of significance was P = 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in ROF in SG (P = 0.06) between the performance with and without a DT; on the contrary, LG demonstrated a significant difference (P = 0.001) for the same tests. In addition, the only time there was a significant difference between the two groups was when they performed DT (P = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Female students who used critical and analytical thinking and motor performance in their study and daily routine were more balanced and resistant to falling than their peers who did not. This study may improve efficient treatments for fall prevention and balance. Future research could investigate the complex nature of additional DT that may be complicated by gender and BMI outside of the normal range.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"269-277"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11761543/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S500767","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Dual tasking (DT) requires individuals to carry out two actions simultaneously, comparable to how the brain can perform a cognitive function while the body is in motion, which eventually enhances human balance. This paper aims to examine and compare the impact of DT on the risk of falling (ROF) among Saudi female students.

Methods: A cross-sectional design was used. 120 female students were recruited and divided into two groups: literary group (LG) (n = 34) and scientific group (SG) (n = 86). Participants, aged 18-25, had a normal body mass index (BMI) and cognitive and balancing skills. ROF was measured using the Biodex balancing device for balance alone (no DT) and with DT (motor and two cognitive tasks). After three trials, the mean and average were calculated. The ICC calculation showed a reliable result of <0.8. BMI was represented as the mean (M) and standard deviation (SD) for both groups. ROF was compared within and between groups using paired and unpaired T-tests. Mann-Whitney compared the two groups throughout DT. The level of significance was P = 0.05.

Results: There was no significant difference in ROF in SG (P = 0.06) between the performance with and without a DT; on the contrary, LG demonstrated a significant difference (P = 0.001) for the same tests. In addition, the only time there was a significant difference between the two groups was when they performed DT (P = 0.006).

Conclusion: Female students who used critical and analytical thinking and motor performance in their study and daily routine were more balanced and resistant to falling than their peers who did not. This study may improve efficient treatments for fall prevention and balance. Future research could investigate the complex nature of additional DT that may be complicated by gender and BMI outside of the normal range.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知-运动双重任务对沙特女学生跌倒风险的影响:一项横断面研究
简介:双重任务(Dual tasking, DT)要求个体同时执行两项任务,类似于大脑在身体运动的同时执行一项认知功能,最终增强人体的平衡性。本文旨在研究和比较DT对沙特女学生跌倒风险(ROF)的影响。方法:采用横断面设计。招募120名女学生,分为文科生组(LG) (n = 34)和理科组(SG) (n = 86)。参与者年龄在18-25岁之间,身体质量指数(BMI)正常,认知和平衡能力正常。使用Biodex平衡装置测量ROF,用于单独平衡(无DT)和DT(运动和两个认知任务)。三次试验后,计算平均值和平均值。结果:使用和不使用DT时,SG的ROF差异无统计学意义(P = 0.06);相反,LG在相同的测试中表现出显著差异(P = 0.001)。此外,两组之间唯一有显著差异的时间是在进行DT时(P = 0.006)。结论:在学习和日常生活中运用批判性和分析性思维和运动能力的女学生比没有运用批判性和分析性思维和运动能力的女学生更能平衡和抵抗跌倒。这项研究可能会提高预防跌倒和平衡的有效治疗方法。未来的研究可能会调查额外DT的复杂性,这可能会因性别和正常范围外的BMI而变得复杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
期刊最新文献
How Does Social Frailty Evolve Among Patients with Prostate Cancer? Evidence from Regression Models versus Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Optimizing Health Insurance Claims Processing: The Role of Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI). Characterization of the Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with Psychotropic Medications Based on a Spontaneous Reporting Systems Database: A Retrospective Analysis. Development and Evaluation of a Risk Prediction Model for Intrahospital Transport Adverse Events in Critically Ill Gynecological Patients. Risk Assessment of Emergency Medical Resource Exhaustion Under Major Infectious Disease Outbreaks: Based on Discrete-Event Simulation Models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1