A mixed-methods investigation of an ecological momentary assessment protocol for cigarette-smoking youth: Psychometric properties and participant experiences
Suhaavi Kochhar , Hanneke Scholten , Dominique F Maciejewski , Michelle A Pingel , Maartje Luijten
{"title":"A mixed-methods investigation of an ecological momentary assessment protocol for cigarette-smoking youth: Psychometric properties and participant experiences","authors":"Suhaavi Kochhar , Hanneke Scholten , Dominique F Maciejewski , Michelle A Pingel , Maartje Luijten","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is popular in smoking research to study time-varying processes and design just-in-time personalised cessation interventions. Yet, research examining the psychometric properties of EMA and user experiences with EMA protocols is lacking. We conducted a mixed-methods study to test the EMA component of a mobile intervention for middle to late-aged adolescents (16–20 years) who smoke cigarettes at least weekly.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Participants (<em>N</em> = 84) filled out global self-report measures at pre- and post-test, and reported their craving, mood, and smoking behaviour five times daily for seven days via their phones. We tested intra-class correlations, convergent validity, test-retest reliability, and multilevel internal consistency of the EMA items. Further, participants answered qualitative questions about their experiences with the EMA including the timing and frequency of assessments, clarity of individual items, and how it impacted their daily lives.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The EMA questionnaires showed good convergent validity and reliability. The average compliance rate was 77 %, and generally, participants evaluated the experience positively. While most participants rated the timing and frequency of EMA positively, some participants did not like that assessments expired after 1.5<!--> <!-->h. Forty percent of participants also reported that they liked monitoring their smoking and mood.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The use of EMA in our target group is feasible and had good compliance. The items used are suitable for researchers to use in future studies. We urge researchers to test the psychometric quality and feasibility of new EMA protocols before using them in confirmatory research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724624000982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is popular in smoking research to study time-varying processes and design just-in-time personalised cessation interventions. Yet, research examining the psychometric properties of EMA and user experiences with EMA protocols is lacking. We conducted a mixed-methods study to test the EMA component of a mobile intervention for middle to late-aged adolescents (16–20 years) who smoke cigarettes at least weekly.
Method
Participants (N = 84) filled out global self-report measures at pre- and post-test, and reported their craving, mood, and smoking behaviour five times daily for seven days via their phones. We tested intra-class correlations, convergent validity, test-retest reliability, and multilevel internal consistency of the EMA items. Further, participants answered qualitative questions about their experiences with the EMA including the timing and frequency of assessments, clarity of individual items, and how it impacted their daily lives.
Results
The EMA questionnaires showed good convergent validity and reliability. The average compliance rate was 77 %, and generally, participants evaluated the experience positively. While most participants rated the timing and frequency of EMA positively, some participants did not like that assessments expired after 1.5 h. Forty percent of participants also reported that they liked monitoring their smoking and mood.
Conclusions
The use of EMA in our target group is feasible and had good compliance. The items used are suitable for researchers to use in future studies. We urge researchers to test the psychometric quality and feasibility of new EMA protocols before using them in confirmatory research.
导言:生态瞬间评估(EMA)在吸烟研究中非常流行,用于研究时间变化过程和设计适时的个性化戒烟干预措施。然而,有关 EMA 心理测量特性和用户使用 EMA 协议体验的研究却十分缺乏。我们开展了一项混合方法研究,以测试针对至少每周吸烟的中晚年青少年(16-20 岁)的移动干预中的 EMA 部分:参与者(84 人)在测试前和测试后填写了全面的自我报告,并在七天内每天五次通过手机报告他们的渴望、情绪和吸烟行为。我们测试了 EMA 项目的类内相关性、收敛有效性、重测可靠性和多层次内部一致性。此外,参与者还回答了有关他们使用 EMA 的体验的定性问题,包括评估的时间和频率、单个项目的清晰度以及 EMA 对他们日常生活的影响:EMA 问卷显示出良好的收敛效度和可靠性。平均符合率为 77%,参与者普遍对此次体验给予了积极评价。虽然大多数参与者对 EMA 的时间和频率给予了积极评价,但一些参与者不喜欢评估在 1.5 小时后失效。40%的参与者还表示,他们喜欢监测自己的吸烟情况和情绪:结论:在我们的目标群体中使用 EMA 是可行的,而且依从性良好。所使用的项目适合研究人员在今后的研究中使用。我们敦促研究人员在将新的 EMA 方案用于确证研究之前,对其心理测量质量和可行性进行测试。