{"title":"Differences in Ocular Biometry Between Short-Axial and Normal-Axial Eyes in the Elderly Japanese.","authors":"Takahiro Tanaka, Koichi Nishitsuka, Hiroto Obata","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S503988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Among patients with angle-closure glaucoma, it is common to have a short-axial eye, which also makes it difficult to select an appropriate intraocular lens. Previous studies have focused on the ocular biometry of the long-axial eye, whereas only a few reports have focused on the short-axial eye. This study aimed to clarify the characteristics of the short-axial eye on ocular biometry among the elderly Japanese.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study included 142 patients who consulted at our hospital. The ocular axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), average anterior corneal radius of curvature (CR), white-to-white (WTW), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and lens thickness (LT) were measured using OA-2000. The short-axial and normal-axial groups (short-axial [SA] and normal-axial [NA] groups) included those with an AL less than 22.5 mm and ranging from 22.5-26.5 mm, respectively. Comparisons between groups were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient tests and multiple regression analyses were performed for all parameters overall and per group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The parameters that were significantly different between the SA and NA groups were CR, WTW, and ACD (all P < 0.0001). In the SA group (42 patients), only ACD was significantly correlated with AL (r = 0.33, P = 0.031). On multiple regression analysis for the SA group, none of the parameters had a significant effect on AL (all P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the SA group, ACD was the only factor that positively correlated with AL; it was significantly shallower than in the NA group. Thus, in the SA eye, it is clinically important to be aware of ACD.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"187-197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S503988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Among patients with angle-closure glaucoma, it is common to have a short-axial eye, which also makes it difficult to select an appropriate intraocular lens. Previous studies have focused on the ocular biometry of the long-axial eye, whereas only a few reports have focused on the short-axial eye. This study aimed to clarify the characteristics of the short-axial eye on ocular biometry among the elderly Japanese.
Patients and methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 142 patients who consulted at our hospital. The ocular axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), average anterior corneal radius of curvature (CR), white-to-white (WTW), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and lens thickness (LT) were measured using OA-2000. The short-axial and normal-axial groups (short-axial [SA] and normal-axial [NA] groups) included those with an AL less than 22.5 mm and ranging from 22.5-26.5 mm, respectively. Comparisons between groups were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient tests and multiple regression analyses were performed for all parameters overall and per group.
Results: The parameters that were significantly different between the SA and NA groups were CR, WTW, and ACD (all P < 0.0001). In the SA group (42 patients), only ACD was significantly correlated with AL (r = 0.33, P = 0.031). On multiple regression analysis for the SA group, none of the parameters had a significant effect on AL (all P > 0.05).
Conclusion: In the SA group, ACD was the only factor that positively correlated with AL; it was significantly shallower than in the NA group. Thus, in the SA eye, it is clinically important to be aware of ACD.