Sohyeon Park, Kalynn Park, Chaeyoon Kim, Sandy Jeong Rhie
{"title":"Optimization of immunotherapy-based combinations for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A network meta-analysis","authors":"Sohyeon Park, Kalynn Park, Chaeyoon Kim, Sandy Jeong Rhie","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite numerous meta-analyses comparing the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy-based combination therapies, the optimal therapeutic combinations remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate the optimal application of all immunotherapy-based combination therapy for advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma, focusing on efficacy and safety.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We systemically searched the Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and PubMed for studies regarding the first-line immunotherapy-based combination therapy in patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma until April 15, 2024. We used network meta-analysis using a random effect model to facilitate direct and indirect treatment comparisons across outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven clinical studies, including 5542 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, were included in the network meta-analysis analysis. Regarding progression-free survival and overall survival, combined Toripalimab + Axitinib significantly outperformed other immunotherapy-based combination therapies. This regimen significantly improved progression-free survival in the intermediate/poor risk group when stratified by prognosis prediction risks compared to sunitinib alone. For the objective response rate, Avelumab + Axitinib was the most preferred strategy in the favorable-risk group, while Nivolumab + Cabozantinib was favored in the intermediate/poor-risk group compared to other immunotherapy-based combinations. The combinations of Nivolumab + Ipilimumab and Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab had favorable safety profiles.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Immunotherapy-based combination therapies significantly improved progression-free survival, overall survival and objective response rate in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma compared to sunitinib monotherapy. However, careful monitoring and personalized treatment strategies are required to balance efficacy and safety in patients with underlying conditions. Future research should focus on optimizing treatment protocols and elucidating the mechanisms of adverse events.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 104630"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842825000186","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Despite numerous meta-analyses comparing the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy-based combination therapies, the optimal therapeutic combinations remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate the optimal application of all immunotherapy-based combination therapy for advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma, focusing on efficacy and safety.
Methods
We systemically searched the Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and PubMed for studies regarding the first-line immunotherapy-based combination therapy in patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma until April 15, 2024. We used network meta-analysis using a random effect model to facilitate direct and indirect treatment comparisons across outcomes.
Results
Seven clinical studies, including 5542 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, were included in the network meta-analysis analysis. Regarding progression-free survival and overall survival, combined Toripalimab + Axitinib significantly outperformed other immunotherapy-based combination therapies. This regimen significantly improved progression-free survival in the intermediate/poor risk group when stratified by prognosis prediction risks compared to sunitinib alone. For the objective response rate, Avelumab + Axitinib was the most preferred strategy in the favorable-risk group, while Nivolumab + Cabozantinib was favored in the intermediate/poor-risk group compared to other immunotherapy-based combinations. The combinations of Nivolumab + Ipilimumab and Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab had favorable safety profiles.
Conclusions
Immunotherapy-based combination therapies significantly improved progression-free survival, overall survival and objective response rate in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma compared to sunitinib monotherapy. However, careful monitoring and personalized treatment strategies are required to balance efficacy and safety in patients with underlying conditions. Future research should focus on optimizing treatment protocols and elucidating the mechanisms of adverse events.
期刊介绍：
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology publishes scholarly, critical reviews in all fields of oncology and hematology written by experts from around the world. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology is the Official Journal of the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the International Society of Liquid Biopsy.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
