Explainable artificial intelligence for neuroimaging-based dementia diagnosis and prognosis.

Sophie A Martin, An Zhao, Jiongqi Qu, Phoebe Imms, Andrei Irimia, Frederik Barkhof, James H Cole
{"title":"Explainable artificial intelligence for neuroimaging-based dementia diagnosis and prognosis.","authors":"Sophie A Martin, An Zhao, Jiongqi Qu, Phoebe Imms, Andrei Irimia, Frederik Barkhof, James H Cole","doi":"10.1101/2025.01.13.25320382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Artificial intelligence and neuroimaging enable accurate dementia prediction, but 'black box' models can be difficult to trust. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) describes techniques to understand model behaviour and the influence of features, however deciding which method is most appropriate is non-trivial. Vision transformers (ViT) have also gained popularity, providing a self-explainable, alternative to traditional convolutional neural networks (CNN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used T1-weighted MRI to train models on two tasks: Alzheimer's disease (AD) classification (diagnosis) and predicting conversion from mild-cognitive impairment (MCI) to AD (prognosis). We compared ten XAI methods across CNN and ViT architectures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Models achieved balanced accuracies of 81% and 67% for diagnosis and prognosis. XAI outputs highlighted brain regions relevant to AD and contained useful information for MCI prognosis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>XAI can be used to verify that models are utilising relevant features and to generate valuable measures for further analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759246/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.13.25320382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence and neuroimaging enable accurate dementia prediction, but 'black box' models can be difficult to trust. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) describes techniques to understand model behaviour and the influence of features, however deciding which method is most appropriate is non-trivial. Vision transformers (ViT) have also gained popularity, providing a self-explainable, alternative to traditional convolutional neural networks (CNN).

Methods: We used T1-weighted MRI to train models on two tasks: Alzheimer's disease (AD) classification (diagnosis) and predicting conversion from mild-cognitive impairment (MCI) to AD (prognosis). We compared ten XAI methods across CNN and ViT architectures.

Results: Models achieved balanced accuracies of 81% and 67% for diagnosis and prognosis. XAI outputs highlighted brain regions relevant to AD and contained useful information for MCI prognosis.

Discussion: XAI can be used to verify that models are utilising relevant features and to generate valuable measures for further analysis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于神经影像学的痴呆诊断和预后的可解释人工智能。
人工智能和神经成像能够准确预测痴呆症,但“黑匣子”模型可能难以信任。可解释的人工智能(XAI)描述了理解模型行为和特征影响的技术,但是决定哪种方法最合适并非易事。视觉变压器(ViT)也越来越受欢迎,它提供了一种自解释的替代传统卷积神经网络(CNN)的方法。方法:我们使用t1加权MRI来训练两项任务的模型:阿尔茨海默病(AD)分类(诊断)和预测从轻度认知障碍(MCI)到AD的转化(预后)。我们比较了CNN和ViT架构中的十种XAI方法。结果:模型在诊断和预后方面达到了81%和67%的平衡准确度。XAI输出突出显示与AD相关的大脑区域,并包含对MCI预后有用的信息。讨论:XAI可用于验证模型是否利用了相关特征,并为进一步分析生成有价值的度量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prompting is All You Need: How to Make LLMs More Helpful for Clinical Decision Support. Multi-tissue transcriptome-wide association study identifies 29 risk genes associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Automated epilepsy and seizure type phenotyping with pre-trained language models. AI-Detected Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Incident Ischemic Stroke and Cardiovascular Events: A UK Biobank Study. Randomized Trial Protocol: Epic Generative AI Chart Summarization Tool to Reduce Ambulatory Provider Cognitive Task Load.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1