Clinical Features Evaluation of Myopic Fundus tessellation from OCTA and MfERG.

Yanyan Zhang, Yan Zhong, Wei Mao, Zhe Zhang, Yusheng Zhou, Hu Li, Jianing Ying, Quanyong Yi
{"title":"Clinical Features Evaluation of Myopic Fundus tessellation from OCTA and MfERG.","authors":"Yanyan Zhang, Yan Zhong, Wei Mao, Zhe Zhang, Yusheng Zhou, Hu Li, Jianing Ying, Quanyong Yi","doi":"10.1016/j.pdpdt.2025.104493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the differences in fundus tessellation among various severities using multifocal visual electrophysiology (MfERG) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) for clinical grading and treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 52 patients totaling 87 eyes. The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grid division method was utilized to assess Grade of fundus tessellation. Data obtained via OCTA and ImageJ software included macular foveal thickness (MT), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), superficial retinal capillary layer vascular density (SVD), deep retinal capillary layer vascular density (DVD), and choroidal blood capillary layer blood flow density (CFD). Multifocal visual electrophysiology equipment provided latency and amplitude of N1 and P1 waves. Differences and changes among the four Grade of fundus tessellation grading were compared, and ROC curve analysis was performed to identify the optimal choroidal thickness indicators for predicting the grading of fundus tessellation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SFCT tends to decrease as the grade of fundus tessellation increases. and the amplitudes of N1 and P1 waves in multifocal electroretinography reduce, with an elongation in their latency periods. Correlation analysis showed that SFCT positively correlated with N1 and P1 amplitudes (r=0.270, 0.246; P<0.05) and negatively correlated with their latency periods (r=-0.219, -0.248; P<0.05). The ROC curve results indicated the cutoff values for SFCT were 192.75µm between Grade 1 and 2, 162µm between Grade 2 and 3, and 130.75µm between Grade 3 and 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Assessment in fundus tessellation using MfERG and OCTA contributes to objective grading of fundus tessellation and further help to clinical prediction and treatment.</p><p><strong>Translational relevance: </strong>Assessment in fundus tessellation morphologically and functionally using MfERG and OCTA contributes to classification and clinical prediction of fundus tessellation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94170,"journal":{"name":"Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy","volume":" ","pages":"104493"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2025.104493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the differences in fundus tessellation among various severities using multifocal visual electrophysiology (MfERG) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) for clinical grading and treatment.

Methods: This study included 52 patients totaling 87 eyes. The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grid division method was utilized to assess Grade of fundus tessellation. Data obtained via OCTA and ImageJ software included macular foveal thickness (MT), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), superficial retinal capillary layer vascular density (SVD), deep retinal capillary layer vascular density (DVD), and choroidal blood capillary layer blood flow density (CFD). Multifocal visual electrophysiology equipment provided latency and amplitude of N1 and P1 waves. Differences and changes among the four Grade of fundus tessellation grading were compared, and ROC curve analysis was performed to identify the optimal choroidal thickness indicators for predicting the grading of fundus tessellation.

Results: SFCT tends to decrease as the grade of fundus tessellation increases. and the amplitudes of N1 and P1 waves in multifocal electroretinography reduce, with an elongation in their latency periods. Correlation analysis showed that SFCT positively correlated with N1 and P1 amplitudes (r=0.270, 0.246; P<0.05) and negatively correlated with their latency periods (r=-0.219, -0.248; P<0.05). The ROC curve results indicated the cutoff values for SFCT were 192.75µm between Grade 1 and 2, 162µm between Grade 2 and 3, and 130.75µm between Grade 3 and 4.

Conclusion: Assessment in fundus tessellation using MfERG and OCTA contributes to objective grading of fundus tessellation and further help to clinical prediction and treatment.

Translational relevance: Assessment in fundus tessellation morphologically and functionally using MfERG and OCTA contributes to classification and clinical prediction of fundus tessellation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Features Evaluation of Myopic Fundus tessellation from OCTA and MfERG. EVALUATION OF MACULA GANGLION CELL ANALYSIS AND RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER THICKNESS IN PREPERIMETRIC GLAUCOMA, EARLY STAGE GLAUCOMA AND HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS. Fluorescence molecular imaging-guided photodynamic therapy for early breast cancer in the prone position: feasibility evaluation with Monte Carlo simulations. Bibliometric analysis of photodynamic research in bladder cancer: trends and future directions. Comparison of photodynamic therapy and LEEP in women of reproductive age with cervical squamous intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (CIN2): A prospective observational study in China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1