EVALUATION OF MACULA GANGLION CELL ANALYSIS AND RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER THICKNESS IN PREPERIMETRIC GLAUCOMA, EARLY STAGE GLAUCOMA AND HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS.

Ozlem Aktas Ozaltun, Ozlem Gurbuz Koz, Ahmet Alper Yarangumeli
{"title":"EVALUATION OF MACULA GANGLION CELL ANALYSIS AND RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER THICKNESS IN PREPERIMETRIC GLAUCOMA, EARLY STAGE GLAUCOMA AND HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS.","authors":"Ozlem Aktas Ozaltun, Ozlem Gurbuz Koz, Ahmet Alper Yarangumeli","doi":"10.1016/j.pdpdt.2025.104495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In this study, it was planned to compare the macular ganglion cell analysis (GCA) and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) of the patients with preperimetric glaucoma (PPG), early stage glaucoma (EG) and the control group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included a total of 103 eyes: 38 from EG patients, 30 from PPG patients, and 35 from healthy individuals at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital Glaucoma Unit between January 2018 and September 2021. Eyes were categorized into control, PPG, and EG groups based on visual field (VF) classification. Topcon DRI Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)-1, a Swept-Source OCT (SS-OCT), measured optic nerve head parameters, pRNFL, gangliyon cell inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), and ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness. Glaucomatous defects were identified using also the SS-OCT SuperPixel map. Diagnostic efficacy of OCT parameters was assessed through area under the curve (AUC) values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All pRNFL and ganglion cell parameters in OCT showed significant differences between the control-PPG and control-EG groups (p<0.05). GCIPL, GCC, and pRNFL thicknesses in the PPG and EG groups were significantly lower than those in the control group (p<0.05). The mean pRNFL thickness emerged as the most valuable diagnostic parameter for distinguishing between the control and EG groups (p<0.05). In the wide-field SuperPixel map, the frequency of glaucomatous defect detection was higher in the EG group than in the PPG group (p<0.05). Mean pRNFL and mean GCIPL thicknesses exhibited the highest sensitivity and specificity for differentiating glaucoma groups from controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OCT parameters were not significantly superior to each other in control-PPG and control-EG. The evaluation of pRNFL and GCA together is still considered to be the most valid diagnostic method.</p>","PeriodicalId":94170,"journal":{"name":"Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy","volume":" ","pages":"104495"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2025.104495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, it was planned to compare the macular ganglion cell analysis (GCA) and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) of the patients with preperimetric glaucoma (PPG), early stage glaucoma (EG) and the control group.

Methods: This retrospective study included a total of 103 eyes: 38 from EG patients, 30 from PPG patients, and 35 from healthy individuals at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital Glaucoma Unit between January 2018 and September 2021. Eyes were categorized into control, PPG, and EG groups based on visual field (VF) classification. Topcon DRI Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)-1, a Swept-Source OCT (SS-OCT), measured optic nerve head parameters, pRNFL, gangliyon cell inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), and ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness. Glaucomatous defects were identified using also the SS-OCT SuperPixel map. Diagnostic efficacy of OCT parameters was assessed through area under the curve (AUC) values.

Results: All pRNFL and ganglion cell parameters in OCT showed significant differences between the control-PPG and control-EG groups (p<0.05). GCIPL, GCC, and pRNFL thicknesses in the PPG and EG groups were significantly lower than those in the control group (p<0.05). The mean pRNFL thickness emerged as the most valuable diagnostic parameter for distinguishing between the control and EG groups (p<0.05). In the wide-field SuperPixel map, the frequency of glaucomatous defect detection was higher in the EG group than in the PPG group (p<0.05). Mean pRNFL and mean GCIPL thicknesses exhibited the highest sensitivity and specificity for differentiating glaucoma groups from controls.

Conclusion: OCT parameters were not significantly superior to each other in control-PPG and control-EG. The evaluation of pRNFL and GCA together is still considered to be the most valid diagnostic method.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Features Evaluation of Myopic Fundus tessellation from OCTA and MfERG. EVALUATION OF MACULA GANGLION CELL ANALYSIS AND RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER THICKNESS IN PREPERIMETRIC GLAUCOMA, EARLY STAGE GLAUCOMA AND HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS. Fluorescence molecular imaging-guided photodynamic therapy for early breast cancer in the prone position: feasibility evaluation with Monte Carlo simulations. Bibliometric analysis of photodynamic research in bladder cancer: trends and future directions. Comparison of photodynamic therapy and LEEP in women of reproductive age with cervical squamous intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (CIN2): A prospective observational study in China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1