Inoculation reduces social media engagement with affectively polarized content in the UK and US.

Fintan Smith, Almog Simchon, Dawn Holford, Stephan Lewandowsky
{"title":"Inoculation reduces social media engagement with affectively polarized content in the UK and US.","authors":"Fintan Smith, Almog Simchon, Dawn Holford, Stephan Lewandowsky","doi":"10.1038/s44271-025-00189-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The generation and distribution of hyper-partisan content on social media has gained millions of exposure across platforms, often allowing malevolent actors to influence and disrupt democracies. The spread of this content is facilitated by real users' engaging with it on platforms. The current study tests the efficacy of an 'inoculation' intervention via six online survey-based experiments in the UK and US. Experiments 1-3 (total N = 3276) found that the inoculation significantly reduced self-reported engagement with polarising stimuli. However, Experiments 4-6 (total N = 1878) found no effects on participants' self-produced written text discussing the topic. The implications of these findings are discussed in the context of the literature on polarisation and previous interventions to reduce engagement with disinformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":501698,"journal":{"name":"Communications Psychology","volume":"3 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11769841/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-025-00189-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The generation and distribution of hyper-partisan content on social media has gained millions of exposure across platforms, often allowing malevolent actors to influence and disrupt democracies. The spread of this content is facilitated by real users' engaging with it on platforms. The current study tests the efficacy of an 'inoculation' intervention via six online survey-based experiments in the UK and US. Experiments 1-3 (total N = 3276) found that the inoculation significantly reduced self-reported engagement with polarising stimuli. However, Experiments 4-6 (total N = 1878) found no effects on participants' self-produced written text discussing the topic. The implications of these findings are discussed in the context of the literature on polarisation and previous interventions to reduce engagement with disinformation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在英国和美国,接种减少了社交媒体对情感两极分化内容的参与。
社交媒体上极端党派内容的生成和传播在各平台上获得了数百万的曝光,往往让恶意行为者得以影响和破坏民主。这些内容的传播是由平台上的真实用户参与促成的。目前的研究通过在英国和美国进行的六个基于在线调查的实验来测试“接种”干预的有效性。实验1-3(总N = 3276)发现接种显著减少了自我报告的极化刺激参与。然而,实验4-6(总N = 1878)没有发现对参与者自行制作的讨论该主题的书面文本的影响。这些发现的含义在关于两极分化和先前干预措施的文献背景下进行了讨论,以减少与虚假信息的接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Auditory perceptual maps in humans and mice share common structures and predict perceptual decisions in discrimination learning. Cross-cultural evidence for positive control and mind-mindedness as buffers for parental distress. Why sycophantic LLMs may imperil interactive norms between humans. Early detection of distinct language development in infants of mothers with severe mental illness using fNIRS. Real-time cognitive-affective dynamics of failure feedback in a technology-based learning task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1